Eleni Gkini, Rachel L Adams, Daniella Spittle, Paul Ellis, Katherine Allsopp, Sanya Saleem, Matthew McKenna, Nick le Mesurier, Nicola Gale, Sarah Tearne, Peymane Adab, Rachel E Jordan, Nawar Diar Bakerly, Alice M Turner
{"title":"痰色图指导慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期抗生素自我治疗:颜色- copd随机对照试验","authors":"Eleni Gkini, Rachel L Adams, Daniella Spittle, Paul Ellis, Katherine Allsopp, Sanya Saleem, Matthew McKenna, Nick le Mesurier, Nicola Gale, Sarah Tearne, Peymane Adab, Rachel E Jordan, Nawar Diar Bakerly, Alice M Turner","doi":"10.3310/KPFD5558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations (acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) are characterised by increased sputum volume, purulence and breathlessness. Patients are encouraged to recognise and treat acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as part of a self-management plan. Only half of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are caused by bacterial infection, but self-management plans generally advocate use of antibiotics and steroids for all events, hence antibiotics may be overused. Sputum colour relates closely to bacterial load; thus it could determine whether antibiotics are appropriate. This pragmatic randomised controlled trial tested whether use of a sputum colour chart is safe and effective in United Kingdom primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Colour chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was a multicentre, randomised controlled trial in adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who had ≥ 2 acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or ≥ 1 hospital admission for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the preceding year. The primary objective was to demonstrate that the Bronkotest<sup>®</sup> (London) sputum colour chart is non-inferior to usual care (safe). The primary outcome was rate of hospital admission for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease at 12 months; secondary outcomes included requirement for second courses of treatment and quality of life (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test score). Nested substudies examining daily symptoms via an e-diary and sputum culture assessed untreated acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease rate and antibiotic resistance, respectively. A process evaluation examined trial fidelity and acceptability of the intervention, employing qualitative research methods incorporating patients as co-researchers.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The study was terminated early due to low recruitment (115/2954 planned sample size).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and fifteen patients were recruited and randomised 1 : 1 to colour chart use or usual care; they generally had severe Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease D chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, with significant breathlessness (54% Medical Research Council score of 4 or 5) and poor quality of life (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test score at baseline 24). Comorbid respiratory and systemic disease was common. Self-management was delivered well in both arms, and the colour chart acceptable to patients and staff; no specific issues for patients with multiple long-term conditions were identified. Hospital admissions for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease tended to occur more in colour chart users [32 vs. 16%, relative risk 1.95 (0.92 to 4.18)], and antibiotic courses within 14 days of initial acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease treatment were also more common [34 vs. 18%, adjusted relative risk 1.80 (0.85 to 3.79)]. Despite this, quality of life was better in colour chart users at 12 months [chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test 19.9 vs. -24.5, adjusted mean difference -2.95 (-5.93 to -0.04)]. Thirty-eight patients consented to the sputum substudy, and 57 samples were received (42 stable state, 15 during acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), of which 30% contained a potentially pathogenic bacterium. Sputum was more likely to be purulent in subjects with bronchiectasis, independent of disease state (stable vs. exacerbation) or whether the sample was positive for a potentially pathogenic bacterium, suggesting that colour alone cannot be used to guide antibiotic use. Eleven patients completed the e-diary study, and 42 symptom-defined acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease events were captured, many of which were untreated, exhibiting lower EXAcerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Tool scores than those which were treated. Untreated events were slower to settle. Differences between study arms were not meaningful to compute due to low numbers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and future work: </strong>Our results imply that the Bronkotest sputum colour chart is unlikely to be a useful addition to self-management for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients in primary care, but further work is required to confirm this.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This synopsis presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme as award number 17/128/04.</p>","PeriodicalId":12898,"journal":{"name":"Health technology assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1-42"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sputum colour charts to guide antibiotic self-treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the Colour-COPD RCT.\",\"authors\":\"Eleni Gkini, Rachel L Adams, Daniella Spittle, Paul Ellis, Katherine Allsopp, Sanya Saleem, Matthew McKenna, Nick le Mesurier, Nicola Gale, Sarah Tearne, Peymane Adab, Rachel E Jordan, Nawar Diar Bakerly, Alice M Turner\",\"doi\":\"10.3310/KPFD5558\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations (acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) are characterised by increased sputum volume, purulence and breathlessness. Patients are encouraged to recognise and treat acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as part of a self-management plan. Only half of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are caused by bacterial infection, but self-management plans generally advocate use of antibiotics and steroids for all events, hence antibiotics may be overused. Sputum colour relates closely to bacterial load; thus it could determine whether antibiotics are appropriate. This pragmatic randomised controlled trial tested whether use of a sputum colour chart is safe and effective in United Kingdom primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Colour chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was a multicentre, randomised controlled trial in adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who had ≥ 2 acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or ≥ 1 hospital admission for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the preceding year. The primary objective was to demonstrate that the Bronkotest<sup>®</sup> (London) sputum colour chart is non-inferior to usual care (safe). The primary outcome was rate of hospital admission for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease at 12 months; secondary outcomes included requirement for second courses of treatment and quality of life (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test score). Nested substudies examining daily symptoms via an e-diary and sputum culture assessed untreated acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease rate and antibiotic resistance, respectively. A process evaluation examined trial fidelity and acceptability of the intervention, employing qualitative research methods incorporating patients as co-researchers.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The study was terminated early due to low recruitment (115/2954 planned sample size).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and fifteen patients were recruited and randomised 1 : 1 to colour chart use or usual care; they generally had severe Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease D chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, with significant breathlessness (54% Medical Research Council score of 4 or 5) and poor quality of life (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test score at baseline 24). Comorbid respiratory and systemic disease was common. Self-management was delivered well in both arms, and the colour chart acceptable to patients and staff; no specific issues for patients with multiple long-term conditions were identified. Hospital admissions for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease tended to occur more in colour chart users [32 vs. 16%, relative risk 1.95 (0.92 to 4.18)], and antibiotic courses within 14 days of initial acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease treatment were also more common [34 vs. 18%, adjusted relative risk 1.80 (0.85 to 3.79)]. Despite this, quality of life was better in colour chart users at 12 months [chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test 19.9 vs. -24.5, adjusted mean difference -2.95 (-5.93 to -0.04)]. Thirty-eight patients consented to the sputum substudy, and 57 samples were received (42 stable state, 15 during acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), of which 30% contained a potentially pathogenic bacterium. Sputum was more likely to be purulent in subjects with bronchiectasis, independent of disease state (stable vs. exacerbation) or whether the sample was positive for a potentially pathogenic bacterium, suggesting that colour alone cannot be used to guide antibiotic use. Eleven patients completed the e-diary study, and 42 symptom-defined acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease events were captured, many of which were untreated, exhibiting lower EXAcerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Tool scores than those which were treated. Untreated events were slower to settle. Differences between study arms were not meaningful to compute due to low numbers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and future work: </strong>Our results imply that the Bronkotest sputum colour chart is unlikely to be a useful addition to self-management for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients in primary care, but further work is required to confirm this.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This synopsis presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme as award number 17/128/04.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health technology assessment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health technology assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3310/KPFD5558\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health technology assessment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/KPFD5558","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重(慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重)的特征是痰量增加、化脓和呼吸困难。作为自我管理计划的一部分,鼓励患者认识和治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的急性加重。慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重中只有一半是由细菌感染引起的,但自我管理计划通常主张对所有事件使用抗生素和类固醇,因此抗生素可能被过度使用。痰液颜色与细菌负荷密切相关;因此,它可以确定抗生素是否合适。这项实用的随机对照试验测试了在英国初级保健中使用痰液颜色表是否安全有效。方法:彩色慢性阻塞性肺疾病是一项多中心、随机对照试验,研究对象为成人慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者,这些患者在前一年有≥2次慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重或≥1次慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重住院。主要目的是证明Bronkotest®(London)痰液颜色图不逊于常规护理(安全)。主要终点为慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重12个月住院率;次要结局包括对第二疗程的要求和生活质量(慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估测试得分)。巢式亚研究通过电子日记和痰培养检查每日症状,分别评估未经治疗的慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重率和抗生素耐药性。过程评估检查了试验的保真度和干预的可接受性,采用定性研究方法,将患者作为共同研究人员。局限性:由于招募人数少(115/2954计划样本量),研究提前终止。结果:115例患者被招募并随机分为1∶1组,使用彩色图表或常规护理;他们通常患有严重的慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议D慢性阻塞性肺疾病,伴有明显的呼吸困难(54%的医学研究委员会评分为4或5)和生活质量差(慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估测试基线评分为24)。呼吸道和全身性疾病合并症很常见。两组的自我管理都很好,患者和工作人员都能接受彩色图表;没有发现患有多种长期疾病的患者的具体问题。慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重住院在彩色图表使用者中更容易发生[32比16%,相对危险度1.95(0.92至4.18)],慢性阻塞性肺疾病首次急性加重治疗后14天内的抗生素疗程也更常见[34比18%,调整相对危险度1.80(0.85至3.79)]。尽管如此,彩色图表使用者在12个月时的生活质量更好[慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估测试19.9 vs. -24.5,调整后平均差-2.95(-5.93至-0.04)]。38名患者同意痰液亚组研究,接受了57份样本(42份处于稳定状态,15份处于慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期),其中30%含有潜在致病菌。支气管扩张受试者的痰更有可能是化脓的,与疾病状态(稳定还是恶化)或样本是否对潜在致病菌呈阳性无关,这表明仅凭颜色不能用于指导抗生素的使用。11名患者完成了电子日记研究,并捕获了42例症状定义的慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重事件,其中许多未经治疗,慢性肺病工具评分低于接受治疗的患者。未处理的事件解决得较慢。由于数量少,研究组之间的差异没有意义。结论和未来的工作:我们的结果表明Bronkotest痰色图不太可能成为初级保健中慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者自我管理的有用补充,但需要进一步的工作来证实这一点。资助:本摘要介绍了由国家卫生与保健研究所(NIHR)卫生技术评估项目资助的独立研究,奖励号为17/128/04。
Sputum colour charts to guide antibiotic self-treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the Colour-COPD RCT.
Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations (acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) are characterised by increased sputum volume, purulence and breathlessness. Patients are encouraged to recognise and treat acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as part of a self-management plan. Only half of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are caused by bacterial infection, but self-management plans generally advocate use of antibiotics and steroids for all events, hence antibiotics may be overused. Sputum colour relates closely to bacterial load; thus it could determine whether antibiotics are appropriate. This pragmatic randomised controlled trial tested whether use of a sputum colour chart is safe and effective in United Kingdom primary care.
Methods: Colour chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was a multicentre, randomised controlled trial in adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who had ≥ 2 acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or ≥ 1 hospital admission for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the preceding year. The primary objective was to demonstrate that the Bronkotest® (London) sputum colour chart is non-inferior to usual care (safe). The primary outcome was rate of hospital admission for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease at 12 months; secondary outcomes included requirement for second courses of treatment and quality of life (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test score). Nested substudies examining daily symptoms via an e-diary and sputum culture assessed untreated acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease rate and antibiotic resistance, respectively. A process evaluation examined trial fidelity and acceptability of the intervention, employing qualitative research methods incorporating patients as co-researchers.
Limitations: The study was terminated early due to low recruitment (115/2954 planned sample size).
Results: One hundred and fifteen patients were recruited and randomised 1 : 1 to colour chart use or usual care; they generally had severe Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease D chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, with significant breathlessness (54% Medical Research Council score of 4 or 5) and poor quality of life (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test score at baseline 24). Comorbid respiratory and systemic disease was common. Self-management was delivered well in both arms, and the colour chart acceptable to patients and staff; no specific issues for patients with multiple long-term conditions were identified. Hospital admissions for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease tended to occur more in colour chart users [32 vs. 16%, relative risk 1.95 (0.92 to 4.18)], and antibiotic courses within 14 days of initial acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease treatment were also more common [34 vs. 18%, adjusted relative risk 1.80 (0.85 to 3.79)]. Despite this, quality of life was better in colour chart users at 12 months [chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test 19.9 vs. -24.5, adjusted mean difference -2.95 (-5.93 to -0.04)]. Thirty-eight patients consented to the sputum substudy, and 57 samples were received (42 stable state, 15 during acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), of which 30% contained a potentially pathogenic bacterium. Sputum was more likely to be purulent in subjects with bronchiectasis, independent of disease state (stable vs. exacerbation) or whether the sample was positive for a potentially pathogenic bacterium, suggesting that colour alone cannot be used to guide antibiotic use. Eleven patients completed the e-diary study, and 42 symptom-defined acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease events were captured, many of which were untreated, exhibiting lower EXAcerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Tool scores than those which were treated. Untreated events were slower to settle. Differences between study arms were not meaningful to compute due to low numbers.
Conclusion and future work: Our results imply that the Bronkotest sputum colour chart is unlikely to be a useful addition to self-management for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients in primary care, but further work is required to confirm this.
Funding: This synopsis presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme as award number 17/128/04.
期刊介绍:
Health Technology Assessment (HTA) publishes research information on the effectiveness, costs and broader impact of health technologies for those who use, manage and provide care in the NHS.