优化去甲替林剂量:基于药物遗传学、基于表型和标准剂量的比较。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Clinical Pharmacokinetics Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-25 DOI:10.1007/s40262-025-01528-x
Cornelis F Vos, Marieke J H Coenen, Sophie E Ter Hark, Arnt F A Schellekens, Rob E Aarnoutse, Joost G E Janzing, Rob Ter Heine
{"title":"优化去甲替林剂量:基于药物遗传学、基于表型和标准剂量的比较。","authors":"Cornelis F Vos, Marieke J H Coenen, Sophie E Ter Hark, Arnt F A Schellekens, Rob E Aarnoutse, Joost G E Janzing, Rob Ter Heine","doi":"10.1007/s40262-025-01528-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Nortriptyline, a tricyclic antidepressant, has an important role in the pharmacotherapy of major depressive disorder (MDD). Individualized dosing approaches, such as pharmacogenetics-based and phenotype-based dosing, may enhance early achievement of therapeutic plasma concentrations, but their comparative accuracy has not been investigated. Our objective was to compare the accuracy of three nortriptyline dosing strategies: pharmacogenetics-based, phenotype-based, and standard dosing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using pharmacokinetic modeling based on data from a randomized controlled trial, we assessed and compared the following dosing strategies: pharmacogenetics-based dosing depending on the cytochrome P-450 (CYP) 2D6 genotype, phenotype-based dosing determined by the plasma concentration measured after a single nortriptyline administration, and standard dosing (125 mg/day). A population pharmacokinetic model was developed to assess phenotype-based dosing recommendations. We evaluated the dosing strategies by comparing the number of participants with predicted therapeutic, subtherapeutic, and supratherapeutic plasma concentrations using Chi-squared (χ<sup>2</sup>) tests. Variability in plasma concentrations was assessed using F-tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both pharmacogenetics-based (χ<sup>2</sup> (1) = 8.0, p = 0.01) and phenotype-based dosing (χ<sup>2</sup> (1) = 5.3, p = 0.02) significantly increased the likelihood of achieving therapeutic plasma concentrations compared with standard dosing while reducing plasma concentration variability. No significant difference was found in the prediction of therapeutic concentrations between the two individualized dosing strategies (χ<sup>2</sup> (1) = 0.33, p = 0.56).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pharmacogenetics-based and phenotype-based dosing demonstrate greater accuracy in predicting therapeutic nortriptyline plasma concentrations than standard dosing. Further research is warranted to explore the clinical application of model-informed precision dosing for nortriptyline and other psychotropic medications.</p>","PeriodicalId":10405,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacokinetics","volume":" ","pages":"1071-1078"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12185566/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing Nortriptyline Dosing: A Comparison between Pharmacogenetics-Based, Phenotype-Based, and Standard Dosing.\",\"authors\":\"Cornelis F Vos, Marieke J H Coenen, Sophie E Ter Hark, Arnt F A Schellekens, Rob E Aarnoutse, Joost G E Janzing, Rob Ter Heine\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40262-025-01528-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Nortriptyline, a tricyclic antidepressant, has an important role in the pharmacotherapy of major depressive disorder (MDD). Individualized dosing approaches, such as pharmacogenetics-based and phenotype-based dosing, may enhance early achievement of therapeutic plasma concentrations, but their comparative accuracy has not been investigated. Our objective was to compare the accuracy of three nortriptyline dosing strategies: pharmacogenetics-based, phenotype-based, and standard dosing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using pharmacokinetic modeling based on data from a randomized controlled trial, we assessed and compared the following dosing strategies: pharmacogenetics-based dosing depending on the cytochrome P-450 (CYP) 2D6 genotype, phenotype-based dosing determined by the plasma concentration measured after a single nortriptyline administration, and standard dosing (125 mg/day). A population pharmacokinetic model was developed to assess phenotype-based dosing recommendations. We evaluated the dosing strategies by comparing the number of participants with predicted therapeutic, subtherapeutic, and supratherapeutic plasma concentrations using Chi-squared (χ<sup>2</sup>) tests. Variability in plasma concentrations was assessed using F-tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both pharmacogenetics-based (χ<sup>2</sup> (1) = 8.0, p = 0.01) and phenotype-based dosing (χ<sup>2</sup> (1) = 5.3, p = 0.02) significantly increased the likelihood of achieving therapeutic plasma concentrations compared with standard dosing while reducing plasma concentration variability. No significant difference was found in the prediction of therapeutic concentrations between the two individualized dosing strategies (χ<sup>2</sup> (1) = 0.33, p = 0.56).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pharmacogenetics-based and phenotype-based dosing demonstrate greater accuracy in predicting therapeutic nortriptyline plasma concentrations than standard dosing. Further research is warranted to explore the clinical application of model-informed precision dosing for nortriptyline and other psychotropic medications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Pharmacokinetics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1071-1078\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12185566/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Pharmacokinetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-025-01528-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacokinetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-025-01528-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:去甲替林是一种三环抗抑郁药,在重度抑郁症(MDD)的药物治疗中具有重要作用。个体化给药方法,如基于药物遗传学和基于表型的给药,可能会提高治疗性血浆浓度的早期成就,但其相对准确性尚未得到研究。我们的目的是比较三种去甲替林给药策略的准确性:基于药物遗传学、基于表型和标准给药。方法:使用基于随机对照试验数据的药代动力学建模,我们评估并比较了以下给药策略:基于药物遗传学的给药取决于细胞色素P-450 (CYP) 2D6基因型,基于表型的给药取决于单次给药后的血浆浓度,以及标准给药(125 mg/天)。建立了一个群体药代动力学模型来评估基于表型的给药建议。我们通过使用χ2检验将受试者人数与预测的治疗、亚治疗和超治疗血浆浓度进行比较,从而评估给药策略。使用f检验评估血浆浓度的变异性。结果:与标准给药相比,基于药物遗传学(χ2 (1) = 8.0, p = 0.01)和基于表型的给药(χ2 (1) = 5.3, p = 0.02)显著增加了达到治疗性血浆浓度的可能性,同时降低了血浆浓度变异性。两种个体化给药策略对治疗浓度的预测差异无统计学意义(χ2 (1) = 0.33, p = 0.56)。结论:基于药物遗传学和基于表型的给药比标准给药更准确地预测治疗用去甲替林的血浆浓度。去甲替林和其他精神药物的模型精确给药的临床应用有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimizing Nortriptyline Dosing: A Comparison between Pharmacogenetics-Based, Phenotype-Based, and Standard Dosing.

Background and objective: Nortriptyline, a tricyclic antidepressant, has an important role in the pharmacotherapy of major depressive disorder (MDD). Individualized dosing approaches, such as pharmacogenetics-based and phenotype-based dosing, may enhance early achievement of therapeutic plasma concentrations, but their comparative accuracy has not been investigated. Our objective was to compare the accuracy of three nortriptyline dosing strategies: pharmacogenetics-based, phenotype-based, and standard dosing.

Methods: Using pharmacokinetic modeling based on data from a randomized controlled trial, we assessed and compared the following dosing strategies: pharmacogenetics-based dosing depending on the cytochrome P-450 (CYP) 2D6 genotype, phenotype-based dosing determined by the plasma concentration measured after a single nortriptyline administration, and standard dosing (125 mg/day). A population pharmacokinetic model was developed to assess phenotype-based dosing recommendations. We evaluated the dosing strategies by comparing the number of participants with predicted therapeutic, subtherapeutic, and supratherapeutic plasma concentrations using Chi-squared (χ2) tests. Variability in plasma concentrations was assessed using F-tests.

Results: Both pharmacogenetics-based (χ2 (1) = 8.0, p = 0.01) and phenotype-based dosing (χ2 (1) = 5.3, p = 0.02) significantly increased the likelihood of achieving therapeutic plasma concentrations compared with standard dosing while reducing plasma concentration variability. No significant difference was found in the prediction of therapeutic concentrations between the two individualized dosing strategies (χ2 (1) = 0.33, p = 0.56).

Conclusions: Pharmacogenetics-based and phenotype-based dosing demonstrate greater accuracy in predicting therapeutic nortriptyline plasma concentrations than standard dosing. Further research is warranted to explore the clinical application of model-informed precision dosing for nortriptyline and other psychotropic medications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
4.40%
发文量
86
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacokinetics promotes the continuing development of clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics for the improvement of drug therapy, and for furthering postgraduate education in clinical pharmacology and therapeutics. Pharmacokinetics, the study of drug disposition in the body, is an integral part of drug development and rational use. Knowledge and application of pharmacokinetic principles leads to accelerated drug development, cost effective drug use and a reduced frequency of adverse effects and drug interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信