阿卡拉布替尼治疗慢性淋巴细胞白血病的三个3期随机试验中的心脏事件

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Rupal O'Quinn, Anthony J Corry, Naghmana Bajwa, Suman Jannuru, Hong Chen, Paulo Miranda, Jennifer R Brown
{"title":"阿卡拉布替尼治疗慢性淋巴细胞白血病的三个3期随机试验中的心脏事件","authors":"Rupal O'Quinn, Anthony J Corry, Naghmana Bajwa, Suman Jannuru, Hong Chen, Paulo Miranda, Jennifer R Brown","doi":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.04.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The first-generation Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor ibrutinib is effective in patients with CLL but is associated with considerable cardiac toxicity. The more selective second-generation BTK inhibitor acalabrutinib has demonstrated a more favorable cardiovascular safety profile with fewer atrial fibrillation events versus ibrutinib. We performed a comprehensive analysis of cardiac outcomes with acalabrutinib versus active comparators, including ibrutinib, in patients with and without baseline cardiovascular disorders.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data from three phase 3 trials in CLL (ELEVATE-RR, ELEVATE-TN, ASCEND) were used. Exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIR; events/100 person-months) were reported for system organ class \"cardiac disorders\" in patients overall and by number of baseline cardiovascular disorders. All analyses were descriptive. No statistical comparisons were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 1362 patients were included; 404 (29.7%) had ≥1 baseline cardiovascular disorder. The overall EAIR of any-grade cardiac disorder events was lower for acalabrutinib versus active comparator in each trial, and acalabrutinib did not increase cardiac events in patients with ≥1 baseline cardiovascular disorder. The EAIR of de novo cardiac disorder events (ie, among patients without baseline cardiovascular disorders) was also lower for acalabrutinib versus active comparator across trials (ELEVATE-RR: 0.34 vs. 0.67 [acalabrutinib vs. ibrutinib], ELEVATE-TN: 0.28 and 0.25 vs. 0.59 [acalabrutinib plus obinutuzumab and acalabrutinib vs. chlorambucil + obinutuzumab], ASCEND: 0.28 vs. 0.44 and 0.54 [acalabrutinib vs. idelalisib plus rituximab and bendamustine plus rituximab]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The EAIRs of cardiac disorder events was relatively low overall with acalabrutinib versus comparators, regardless of the presence of baseline cardiovascular disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":10348,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cardiac Events in Three Phase 3 Randomized Trials Including Acalabrutinib in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.\",\"authors\":\"Rupal O'Quinn, Anthony J Corry, Naghmana Bajwa, Suman Jannuru, Hong Chen, Paulo Miranda, Jennifer R Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clml.2025.04.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The first-generation Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor ibrutinib is effective in patients with CLL but is associated with considerable cardiac toxicity. The more selective second-generation BTK inhibitor acalabrutinib has demonstrated a more favorable cardiovascular safety profile with fewer atrial fibrillation events versus ibrutinib. We performed a comprehensive analysis of cardiac outcomes with acalabrutinib versus active comparators, including ibrutinib, in patients with and without baseline cardiovascular disorders.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data from three phase 3 trials in CLL (ELEVATE-RR, ELEVATE-TN, ASCEND) were used. Exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIR; events/100 person-months) were reported for system organ class \\\"cardiac disorders\\\" in patients overall and by number of baseline cardiovascular disorders. All analyses were descriptive. No statistical comparisons were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 1362 patients were included; 404 (29.7%) had ≥1 baseline cardiovascular disorder. The overall EAIR of any-grade cardiac disorder events was lower for acalabrutinib versus active comparator in each trial, and acalabrutinib did not increase cardiac events in patients with ≥1 baseline cardiovascular disorder. The EAIR of de novo cardiac disorder events (ie, among patients without baseline cardiovascular disorders) was also lower for acalabrutinib versus active comparator across trials (ELEVATE-RR: 0.34 vs. 0.67 [acalabrutinib vs. ibrutinib], ELEVATE-TN: 0.28 and 0.25 vs. 0.59 [acalabrutinib plus obinutuzumab and acalabrutinib vs. chlorambucil + obinutuzumab], ASCEND: 0.28 vs. 0.44 and 0.54 [acalabrutinib vs. idelalisib plus rituximab and bendamustine plus rituximab]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The EAIRs of cardiac disorder events was relatively low overall with acalabrutinib versus comparators, regardless of the presence of baseline cardiovascular disorders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2025.04.018\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2025.04.018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:第一代布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶(BTK)抑制剂依鲁替尼对CLL患者有效,但与相当大的心脏毒性相关。选择性更强的第二代BTK抑制剂acalabrutinib与ibrutinib相比具有更有利的心血管安全性和更少的房颤事件。我们对阿卡拉布替尼与包括伊鲁替尼在内的活性比较物在有和无基线心血管疾病患者中的心脏结局进行了全面分析。材料和方法:使用来自CLL 3个3期试验(ELEVATE-RR, ELEVATE-TN, ASCEND)的数据。暴露调整发病率(EAIR;事件/100人月)报告了总体患者的系统器官类别“心脏疾病”和基线心血管疾病的数量。所有的分析都是描述性的。没有进行统计学比较。结果:共纳入1362例患者;404例(29.7%)有≥1种基线心血管疾病。在每项试验中,阿卡拉布替尼与活性比较剂相比,任何级别心脏疾病事件的总体EAIR都较低,阿卡拉布替尼不会增加基线心血管疾病≥1的患者的心脏事件。阿卡拉布替尼与活性比较剂的新发心脏疾病事件(即无基线心血管疾病的患者)的EAIR在各试验中也较低(升高- rr: 0.34 vs. 0.67[阿卡拉布替尼vs.依鲁替尼],升高- tn: 0.28和0.25 vs. 0.59[阿卡拉布替尼+奥比妥珠单抗和阿卡拉布替尼vs.氯氨布西+奥比妥珠单抗],上升:0.28 vs. 0.44和0.54[阿卡拉布替尼vs.理想拉替尼+利妥昔单抗和苯达莫司汀+利妥昔单抗])。结论:无论是否存在基线心血管疾病,阿卡拉布替尼的心脏疾病事件的eair总体上相对较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cardiac Events in Three Phase 3 Randomized Trials Including Acalabrutinib in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

Background: The first-generation Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor ibrutinib is effective in patients with CLL but is associated with considerable cardiac toxicity. The more selective second-generation BTK inhibitor acalabrutinib has demonstrated a more favorable cardiovascular safety profile with fewer atrial fibrillation events versus ibrutinib. We performed a comprehensive analysis of cardiac outcomes with acalabrutinib versus active comparators, including ibrutinib, in patients with and without baseline cardiovascular disorders.

Materials and methods: Data from three phase 3 trials in CLL (ELEVATE-RR, ELEVATE-TN, ASCEND) were used. Exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIR; events/100 person-months) were reported for system organ class "cardiac disorders" in patients overall and by number of baseline cardiovascular disorders. All analyses were descriptive. No statistical comparisons were performed.

Results: In total, 1362 patients were included; 404 (29.7%) had ≥1 baseline cardiovascular disorder. The overall EAIR of any-grade cardiac disorder events was lower for acalabrutinib versus active comparator in each trial, and acalabrutinib did not increase cardiac events in patients with ≥1 baseline cardiovascular disorder. The EAIR of de novo cardiac disorder events (ie, among patients without baseline cardiovascular disorders) was also lower for acalabrutinib versus active comparator across trials (ELEVATE-RR: 0.34 vs. 0.67 [acalabrutinib vs. ibrutinib], ELEVATE-TN: 0.28 and 0.25 vs. 0.59 [acalabrutinib plus obinutuzumab and acalabrutinib vs. chlorambucil + obinutuzumab], ASCEND: 0.28 vs. 0.44 and 0.54 [acalabrutinib vs. idelalisib plus rituximab and bendamustine plus rituximab]).

Conclusions: The EAIRs of cardiac disorder events was relatively low overall with acalabrutinib versus comparators, regardless of the presence of baseline cardiovascular disorders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
1606
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia is a peer-reviewed monthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of lymphoma, myeloma and leukemia. Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of lymphoma, myeloma, leukemia and related disorders including macroglobulinemia, amyloidosis, and plasma-cell dyscrasias. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to lymphoma, myeloma and leukemia. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信