2SLGBTQQIA+患者急诊科护理经验:一项混合方法研究

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Sidonie Chard, Sawyer Karabelas-Pittman, Kel Martin, Elliot Chapple, David Messenger, Susan A Bartels, Melanie Walker
{"title":"2SLGBTQQIA+患者急诊科护理经验:一项混合方法研究","authors":"Sidonie Chard, Sawyer Karabelas-Pittman, Kel Martin, Elliot Chapple, David Messenger, Susan A Bartels, Melanie Walker","doi":"10.1186/s12913-025-12684-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Equity-deserving groups (EDG), including those who identify as two-spirit, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, questioning, intersex, and/or asexual (2SLGBTQQIA+), are disproportionately treated in the Emergency Department (ED). This study aimed to understand ED care experiences of 2SLGBTQQIA+ individuals compared to those who do not identify with an equity-deserving group in Kingston, Canada, ultimately aiming to enhance inclusivity and better meet healthcare needs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected through a mixed qualitative/quantitative cross-sectional study using a novel electronic survey tool (Spryng.io), which purposely integrates qualitative and quantitative data, while minimising researcher bias. A community-based participatory approach was employed to involve community stakeholders. Participants were recruited from the Kingston Health Sciences Centre's ED, Urgent Care Centre, and at community-based organisations. Quantitative data were analysed using chi-squared tests, while qualitative data underwent thematic analysis. Results were triangulated. Focus group discussions with community partners were then undertaken to contextualise findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to persons who did not identify as belonging to an EDG (n = 949), 2SLGBTQQIA+ individuals (n = 118) felt their identity had a more negative impact on their care (p < 0.0001) and experienced more judgment and disrespect from healthcare providers (HCPs) (p < 0.0001). Four themes emerged from triangulation of qualitative and quantitative data: (1) mixed emotions regarding ED care; (2) transgender and non-binary health care considerations; (3) unmet mental health needs; and (4) lack of patient-centred care for 2SLGBTQQIA+ patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>2SLGBTQQIA+ individuals often face unmet mental health care needs, requiring tailored mental health care provision in the ED. Intersectionality within the 2SLGBTQQIA+ population underscores the importance of trauma-informed care. Strategies to improve 2SLGBTQQIA+ healthcare include implementing safer spaces, clear feedback mechanisms, referrals to gender-affirming specialists, and privacy in triage. Further research should assess the impact of educational interventions on HCP knowledge and patient experiences in the ED.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"751"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emergency department care experiences among 2SLGBTQQIA+ patients: a mixed methods study.\",\"authors\":\"Sidonie Chard, Sawyer Karabelas-Pittman, Kel Martin, Elliot Chapple, David Messenger, Susan A Bartels, Melanie Walker\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12913-025-12684-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Equity-deserving groups (EDG), including those who identify as two-spirit, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, questioning, intersex, and/or asexual (2SLGBTQQIA+), are disproportionately treated in the Emergency Department (ED). This study aimed to understand ED care experiences of 2SLGBTQQIA+ individuals compared to those who do not identify with an equity-deserving group in Kingston, Canada, ultimately aiming to enhance inclusivity and better meet healthcare needs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected through a mixed qualitative/quantitative cross-sectional study using a novel electronic survey tool (Spryng.io), which purposely integrates qualitative and quantitative data, while minimising researcher bias. A community-based participatory approach was employed to involve community stakeholders. Participants were recruited from the Kingston Health Sciences Centre's ED, Urgent Care Centre, and at community-based organisations. Quantitative data were analysed using chi-squared tests, while qualitative data underwent thematic analysis. Results were triangulated. Focus group discussions with community partners were then undertaken to contextualise findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to persons who did not identify as belonging to an EDG (n = 949), 2SLGBTQQIA+ individuals (n = 118) felt their identity had a more negative impact on their care (p < 0.0001) and experienced more judgment and disrespect from healthcare providers (HCPs) (p < 0.0001). Four themes emerged from triangulation of qualitative and quantitative data: (1) mixed emotions regarding ED care; (2) transgender and non-binary health care considerations; (3) unmet mental health needs; and (4) lack of patient-centred care for 2SLGBTQQIA+ patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>2SLGBTQQIA+ individuals often face unmet mental health care needs, requiring tailored mental health care provision in the ED. Intersectionality within the 2SLGBTQQIA+ population underscores the importance of trauma-informed care. Strategies to improve 2SLGBTQQIA+ healthcare include implementing safer spaces, clear feedback mechanisms, referrals to gender-affirming specialists, and privacy in triage. Further research should assess the impact of educational interventions on HCP knowledge and patient experiences in the ED.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"751\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12684-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12684-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:平等应得群体(EDG),包括双性恋、女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别者、酷儿、质疑者、双性人和/或无性恋者(2SLGBTQQIA+),在急诊科(ED)的治疗比例不成比例。本研究旨在了解加拿大Kingston的2SLGBTQQIA+个体与不属于平等群体的个体的ED护理经历,最终旨在提高包容性,更好地满足医疗需求。方法:使用新型电子调查工具(Spryng.io)通过混合定性/定量横断面研究收集数据,该工具有意整合定性和定量数据,同时最大限度地减少研究者的偏见。采用了以社区为基础的参与性办法,使社区利益攸关方参与进来。参与者是从金斯顿健康科学中心的急诊科、紧急护理中心和社区组织招募的。定量数据采用卡方检验分析,定性数据采用专题分析。结果被三角化。然后与社区伙伴进行焦点小组讨论,将调查结果置于背景下。结果:与不认为自己属于EDG的人(n = 949)相比,2名slgbtqqia +个体(n = 118)认为他们的身份对他们的护理有更大的负面影响(p < 0.0001),并经历了更多的医疗保健提供者(HCPs)的判断和不尊重(p < 0.0001)。从定性和定量数据的三角测量中得出四个主题:(1)对急诊科护理的复杂情绪;(2)跨性别和非二元保健考虑;(3)心理健康需求未得到满足;(4)对2SLGBTQQIA+患者缺乏以患者为中心的护理。结论:2SLGBTQQIA+个体经常面临未满足的精神卫生保健需求,需要在ED中提供量身定制的精神卫生保健服务。2SLGBTQQIA+人群中的交叉性强调了创伤知情护理的重要性。改善2SLGBTQQIA+医疗保健的战略包括实施更安全的空间、明确的反馈机制、转介给性别确认专家以及分类中的隐私。进一步的研究应该评估教育干预对急诊科HCP知识和患者体验的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Emergency department care experiences among 2SLGBTQQIA+ patients: a mixed methods study.

Background: Equity-deserving groups (EDG), including those who identify as two-spirit, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, questioning, intersex, and/or asexual (2SLGBTQQIA+), are disproportionately treated in the Emergency Department (ED). This study aimed to understand ED care experiences of 2SLGBTQQIA+ individuals compared to those who do not identify with an equity-deserving group in Kingston, Canada, ultimately aiming to enhance inclusivity and better meet healthcare needs.

Methods: Data were collected through a mixed qualitative/quantitative cross-sectional study using a novel electronic survey tool (Spryng.io), which purposely integrates qualitative and quantitative data, while minimising researcher bias. A community-based participatory approach was employed to involve community stakeholders. Participants were recruited from the Kingston Health Sciences Centre's ED, Urgent Care Centre, and at community-based organisations. Quantitative data were analysed using chi-squared tests, while qualitative data underwent thematic analysis. Results were triangulated. Focus group discussions with community partners were then undertaken to contextualise findings.

Results: Compared to persons who did not identify as belonging to an EDG (n = 949), 2SLGBTQQIA+ individuals (n = 118) felt their identity had a more negative impact on their care (p < 0.0001) and experienced more judgment and disrespect from healthcare providers (HCPs) (p < 0.0001). Four themes emerged from triangulation of qualitative and quantitative data: (1) mixed emotions regarding ED care; (2) transgender and non-binary health care considerations; (3) unmet mental health needs; and (4) lack of patient-centred care for 2SLGBTQQIA+ patients.

Conclusions: 2SLGBTQQIA+ individuals often face unmet mental health care needs, requiring tailored mental health care provision in the ED. Intersectionality within the 2SLGBTQQIA+ population underscores the importance of trauma-informed care. Strategies to improve 2SLGBTQQIA+ healthcare include implementing safer spaces, clear feedback mechanisms, referrals to gender-affirming specialists, and privacy in triage. Further research should assess the impact of educational interventions on HCP knowledge and patient experiences in the ED.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信