Inger Jorid Berg, Eirik K Kristianslund, Anne Therese Tveter, Joseph Sexton, Gunnstein Bakland, Laure Gossec, Sarah Hakim, Gary J Macfarlane, Ellen Moholt, Sella Aarrestad Provan, Emil E Kvernberg Thomassen, Annette de Thurah, Espen A Haavardsholm, Siri Lillegraven, Nina Osteras
{"title":"轴型脊柱炎的远程监测或患者主动护理:一项三臂随机对照非劣效性试验","authors":"Inger Jorid Berg, Eirik K Kristianslund, Anne Therese Tveter, Joseph Sexton, Gunnstein Bakland, Laure Gossec, Sarah Hakim, Gary J Macfarlane, Ellen Moholt, Sella Aarrestad Provan, Emil E Kvernberg Thomassen, Annette de Thurah, Espen A Haavardsholm, Siri Lillegraven, Nina Osteras","doi":"10.1016/j.ard.2025.04.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to determine whether novel follow-up regimen, remote monitoring, or patient-initiated care is noninferior to usual care in maintaining low disease activity, in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a randomised, controlled, 3-armed, parallel-group, open-label, noninferiority trial. Patients with axSpA in low disease activity on stable treatment with tumour necrosis factor inhibitor were recruited from a Norwegian outpatient clinic. Patients were randomly allocated 1:1:1 to remote monitoring, patient-initiated care, or usual care (control group), with 18 months of follow-up. Primary outcome was mean probability of axSpA Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) of <2.1, compared between groups at 6, 12, and 18 months, with 15% noninferiority margin. Secondary outcomes included other measures of disease activity, physical function, patient satisfaction, change of medication, resource use, and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 243 patients enrolled patients, 235 completed the study (remote monitoring = 75, patient-initiated care = 79, usual care = 81). At the 6-month, 12-month, and 18-month assessments, 90% or more patients in all 3 groups had ASDAS of <2.1. The estimated difference of probability of ASDAS < 2.1 was as follows: usual care vs remote monitoring, -4.1% (97.5% CI, -9.9% to 1.8%); usual care vs patient-initiated care, -1.1% (97.5% CI, -7.2% to 4.9%); and remote monitoring vs patient-initiated care, 2.9% (95% CI, -1.5% to 7.4%). Health providers' resource use was lowest in patient-initiated care; other secondary outcomes were comparable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with axSpA in low disease activity and on stable treatment with tumour necrosis factor inhibitor, follow-up with remote monitoring or patient-initiated care was noninferior to usual care in maintaining low disease activity, supporting the implementation of novel follow-up strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":8087,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"1140-1150"},"PeriodicalIF":20.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Remote monitoring or patient-initiated care in axial spondyloarthritis: a 3-armed randomised controlled noninferiority trial.\",\"authors\":\"Inger Jorid Berg, Eirik K Kristianslund, Anne Therese Tveter, Joseph Sexton, Gunnstein Bakland, Laure Gossec, Sarah Hakim, Gary J Macfarlane, Ellen Moholt, Sella Aarrestad Provan, Emil E Kvernberg Thomassen, Annette de Thurah, Espen A Haavardsholm, Siri Lillegraven, Nina Osteras\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ard.2025.04.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to determine whether novel follow-up regimen, remote monitoring, or patient-initiated care is noninferior to usual care in maintaining low disease activity, in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a randomised, controlled, 3-armed, parallel-group, open-label, noninferiority trial. Patients with axSpA in low disease activity on stable treatment with tumour necrosis factor inhibitor were recruited from a Norwegian outpatient clinic. Patients were randomly allocated 1:1:1 to remote monitoring, patient-initiated care, or usual care (control group), with 18 months of follow-up. Primary outcome was mean probability of axSpA Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) of <2.1, compared between groups at 6, 12, and 18 months, with 15% noninferiority margin. Secondary outcomes included other measures of disease activity, physical function, patient satisfaction, change of medication, resource use, and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 243 patients enrolled patients, 235 completed the study (remote monitoring = 75, patient-initiated care = 79, usual care = 81). At the 6-month, 12-month, and 18-month assessments, 90% or more patients in all 3 groups had ASDAS of <2.1. The estimated difference of probability of ASDAS < 2.1 was as follows: usual care vs remote monitoring, -4.1% (97.5% CI, -9.9% to 1.8%); usual care vs patient-initiated care, -1.1% (97.5% CI, -7.2% to 4.9%); and remote monitoring vs patient-initiated care, 2.9% (95% CI, -1.5% to 7.4%). Health providers' resource use was lowest in patient-initiated care; other secondary outcomes were comparable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with axSpA in low disease activity and on stable treatment with tumour necrosis factor inhibitor, follow-up with remote monitoring or patient-initiated care was noninferior to usual care in maintaining low disease activity, supporting the implementation of novel follow-up strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1140-1150\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":20.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ard.2025.04.019\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ard.2025.04.019","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Remote monitoring or patient-initiated care in axial spondyloarthritis: a 3-armed randomised controlled noninferiority trial.
Objectives: This study aimed to determine whether novel follow-up regimen, remote monitoring, or patient-initiated care is noninferior to usual care in maintaining low disease activity, in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).
Methods: This is a randomised, controlled, 3-armed, parallel-group, open-label, noninferiority trial. Patients with axSpA in low disease activity on stable treatment with tumour necrosis factor inhibitor were recruited from a Norwegian outpatient clinic. Patients were randomly allocated 1:1:1 to remote monitoring, patient-initiated care, or usual care (control group), with 18 months of follow-up. Primary outcome was mean probability of axSpA Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) of <2.1, compared between groups at 6, 12, and 18 months, with 15% noninferiority margin. Secondary outcomes included other measures of disease activity, physical function, patient satisfaction, change of medication, resource use, and adverse events.
Results: Of 243 patients enrolled patients, 235 completed the study (remote monitoring = 75, patient-initiated care = 79, usual care = 81). At the 6-month, 12-month, and 18-month assessments, 90% or more patients in all 3 groups had ASDAS of <2.1. The estimated difference of probability of ASDAS < 2.1 was as follows: usual care vs remote monitoring, -4.1% (97.5% CI, -9.9% to 1.8%); usual care vs patient-initiated care, -1.1% (97.5% CI, -7.2% to 4.9%); and remote monitoring vs patient-initiated care, 2.9% (95% CI, -1.5% to 7.4%). Health providers' resource use was lowest in patient-initiated care; other secondary outcomes were comparable.
Conclusions: In patients with axSpA in low disease activity and on stable treatment with tumour necrosis factor inhibitor, follow-up with remote monitoring or patient-initiated care was noninferior to usual care in maintaining low disease activity, supporting the implementation of novel follow-up strategies.
期刊介绍:
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (ARD) is an international peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of rheumatology, which includes the full spectrum of musculoskeletal conditions, arthritic disease, and connective tissue disorders. ARD publishes basic, clinical, and translational scientific research, including the most important recommendations for the management of various conditions.