森林冠层生物研究现状:以哥伦比亚为例研究热带生物多样性国家

IF 1.6 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Austral Ecology Pub Date : 2025-05-26 DOI:10.1111/aec.70075
David L. Anderson, Julián Lozano-Flórez, Sandra P. Galeano, Daniela García-Cobos, Nicolás Reyes-Amaya, Eliana Barona-Cortés, Julián Clavijo-Bustos, Johann Stephens Cárdenas-Bautista, Sebastián Cifuentes-Acevedo, Gustavo A. Bravo, Luis Felipe Barrera, Angelica Guzmán, Nathalia Moreno-Niño, Sandra Milena Urbano-Apráez, Carolina Gómez-Posada, Angela M. Mendoza-Henao
{"title":"森林冠层生物研究现状:以哥伦比亚为例研究热带生物多样性国家","authors":"David L. Anderson,&nbsp;Julián Lozano-Flórez,&nbsp;Sandra P. Galeano,&nbsp;Daniela García-Cobos,&nbsp;Nicolás Reyes-Amaya,&nbsp;Eliana Barona-Cortés,&nbsp;Julián Clavijo-Bustos,&nbsp;Johann Stephens Cárdenas-Bautista,&nbsp;Sebastián Cifuentes-Acevedo,&nbsp;Gustavo A. Bravo,&nbsp;Luis Felipe Barrera,&nbsp;Angelica Guzmán,&nbsp;Nathalia Moreno-Niño,&nbsp;Sandra Milena Urbano-Apráez,&nbsp;Carolina Gómez-Posada,&nbsp;Angela M. Mendoza-Henao","doi":"10.1111/aec.70075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Forests are a critical interface between Earth's terrestrial biomass and the atmosphere that play a pivotal role in biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services provision. Despite their importance, the study of forest canopies has been hindered by accessibility challenges. Because canopy biodiversity and ecology are inadequately sampled from the ground, the historic dependence on ground-based data limits our understanding of forest biology at local and regional scales, which in turn can obstruct or challenge the setting of conservation priorities. This is particularly true for tropical countries with the highest levels of forest biodiversity and degradation. We evaluate the published research outputs from canopy research in Colombia, a megadiverse tropical country that faces escalating deforestation rates, which may serve as a model for tropical countries with high levels of biodiversity and mounting conservation challenges. Through a comprehensive literature review spanning 1974–2022, we assessed the taxonomic groups, research objectives, methodological approaches, and geographical distribution of canopy research. Our findings reveal that canopy research in Colombia is skewed in its taxonomic focus towards vascular plants and its geographic coverage is greatest in the Andes. Moreover, most studies treated the canopy as a covariate rather than the primary research objective, thereby limiting possible inferences into canopy biodiversity. Our results offer a call to action to increase the number of canopy studies in Colombia, emphasising the need for increased geographic representation, capacity-building, interdisciplinary collaboration, and the involvement of non-academic stakeholders. As the Global South faces critical conservation challenges, understanding canopy biodiversity and processes will be essential for informed conservation and sustainable forest management strategies in biologically diverse nations. We conclude by proposing four lessons from Colombia to advance canopy research in megadiverse tropical countries.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8663,"journal":{"name":"Austral Ecology","volume":"50 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The State of Biological Research in Forest Canopies: Colombia as a Case Study for Megadiverse Tropical Countries\",\"authors\":\"David L. Anderson,&nbsp;Julián Lozano-Flórez,&nbsp;Sandra P. Galeano,&nbsp;Daniela García-Cobos,&nbsp;Nicolás Reyes-Amaya,&nbsp;Eliana Barona-Cortés,&nbsp;Julián Clavijo-Bustos,&nbsp;Johann Stephens Cárdenas-Bautista,&nbsp;Sebastián Cifuentes-Acevedo,&nbsp;Gustavo A. Bravo,&nbsp;Luis Felipe Barrera,&nbsp;Angelica Guzmán,&nbsp;Nathalia Moreno-Niño,&nbsp;Sandra Milena Urbano-Apráez,&nbsp;Carolina Gómez-Posada,&nbsp;Angela M. Mendoza-Henao\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aec.70075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Forests are a critical interface between Earth's terrestrial biomass and the atmosphere that play a pivotal role in biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services provision. Despite their importance, the study of forest canopies has been hindered by accessibility challenges. Because canopy biodiversity and ecology are inadequately sampled from the ground, the historic dependence on ground-based data limits our understanding of forest biology at local and regional scales, which in turn can obstruct or challenge the setting of conservation priorities. This is particularly true for tropical countries with the highest levels of forest biodiversity and degradation. We evaluate the published research outputs from canopy research in Colombia, a megadiverse tropical country that faces escalating deforestation rates, which may serve as a model for tropical countries with high levels of biodiversity and mounting conservation challenges. Through a comprehensive literature review spanning 1974–2022, we assessed the taxonomic groups, research objectives, methodological approaches, and geographical distribution of canopy research. Our findings reveal that canopy research in Colombia is skewed in its taxonomic focus towards vascular plants and its geographic coverage is greatest in the Andes. Moreover, most studies treated the canopy as a covariate rather than the primary research objective, thereby limiting possible inferences into canopy biodiversity. Our results offer a call to action to increase the number of canopy studies in Colombia, emphasising the need for increased geographic representation, capacity-building, interdisciplinary collaboration, and the involvement of non-academic stakeholders. As the Global South faces critical conservation challenges, understanding canopy biodiversity and processes will be essential for informed conservation and sustainable forest management strategies in biologically diverse nations. We conclude by proposing four lessons from Colombia to advance canopy research in megadiverse tropical countries.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8663,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Austral Ecology\",\"volume\":\"50 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Austral Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aec.70075\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austral Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aec.70075","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

森林是地球陆地生物量与大气之间的关键界面,在保护生物多样性和提供生态系统服务方面发挥着关键作用。尽管它们很重要,但对森林冠层的研究一直受到可及性挑战的阻碍。由于从地面采集的林冠生物多样性和生态学样本不足,对地面数据的历史依赖限制了我们对局部和区域尺度森林生物学的理解,这反过来又会阻碍或挑战保护优先事项的设置。森林生物多样性和退化程度最高的热带国家尤其如此。我们评估了哥伦比亚冠层研究的已发表研究成果,哥伦比亚是一个面临森林砍伐率不断上升的超级多样性热带国家,这可能为具有高生物多样性和日益严峻的保护挑战的热带国家提供一个模式。通过对1974-2022年林冠研究的文献综述,对林冠研究的分类类群、研究目标、研究方法和地理分布进行了评价。研究结果表明,哥伦比亚的冠层研究在分类学上偏向于维管植物,其地理覆盖范围在安第斯山脉最大。此外,大多数研究将冠层作为协变量而不是主要研究目标,从而限制了对冠层生物多样性的可能推断。我们的研究结果呼吁采取行动,增加哥伦比亚冠层研究的数量,强调需要增加地理代表性、能力建设、跨学科合作以及非学术利益相关者的参与。随着全球南方面临严峻的保护挑战,了解林冠生物多样性及其过程对于生物多样性国家的知情保护和可持续森林管理战略至关重要。最后,我们提出了哥伦比亚的四个经验教训,以促进热带生物多样性国家的冠层研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The State of Biological Research in Forest Canopies: Colombia as a Case Study for Megadiverse Tropical Countries

Forests are a critical interface between Earth's terrestrial biomass and the atmosphere that play a pivotal role in biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services provision. Despite their importance, the study of forest canopies has been hindered by accessibility challenges. Because canopy biodiversity and ecology are inadequately sampled from the ground, the historic dependence on ground-based data limits our understanding of forest biology at local and regional scales, which in turn can obstruct or challenge the setting of conservation priorities. This is particularly true for tropical countries with the highest levels of forest biodiversity and degradation. We evaluate the published research outputs from canopy research in Colombia, a megadiverse tropical country that faces escalating deforestation rates, which may serve as a model for tropical countries with high levels of biodiversity and mounting conservation challenges. Through a comprehensive literature review spanning 1974–2022, we assessed the taxonomic groups, research objectives, methodological approaches, and geographical distribution of canopy research. Our findings reveal that canopy research in Colombia is skewed in its taxonomic focus towards vascular plants and its geographic coverage is greatest in the Andes. Moreover, most studies treated the canopy as a covariate rather than the primary research objective, thereby limiting possible inferences into canopy biodiversity. Our results offer a call to action to increase the number of canopy studies in Colombia, emphasising the need for increased geographic representation, capacity-building, interdisciplinary collaboration, and the involvement of non-academic stakeholders. As the Global South faces critical conservation challenges, understanding canopy biodiversity and processes will be essential for informed conservation and sustainable forest management strategies in biologically diverse nations. We conclude by proposing four lessons from Colombia to advance canopy research in megadiverse tropical countries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Austral Ecology
Austral Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Austral Ecology is the premier journal for basic and applied ecology in the Southern Hemisphere. As the official Journal of The Ecological Society of Australia (ESA), Austral Ecology addresses the commonality between ecosystems in Australia and many parts of southern Africa, South America, New Zealand and Oceania. For example many species in the unique biotas of these regions share common Gondwana ancestors. ESA''s aim is to publish innovative research to encourage the sharing of information and experiences that enrich the understanding of the ecology of the Southern Hemisphere. Austral Ecology involves an editorial board with representatives from Australia, South Africa, New Zealand, Brazil and Argentina. These representatives provide expert opinions, access to qualified reviewers and act as a focus for attracting a wide range of contributions from countries across the region. Austral Ecology publishes original papers describing experimental, observational or theoretical studies on terrestrial, marine or freshwater systems, which are considered without taxonomic bias. Special thematic issues are published regularly, including symposia on the ecology of estuaries and soft sediment habitats, freshwater systems and coral reef fish.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信