早期职业研究人员在声誉、信任、道德、人工智能等方面开放引文

IF 2.4 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
David Nicholas, Abdullah Abrizah, David Clark, Blanca Rodríguez-Bravo, Jorge Revez, Eti Herman, Marzena Świgoń, Jie Xu, Anthony Watkinson
{"title":"早期职业研究人员在声誉、信任、道德、人工智能等方面开放引文","authors":"David Nicholas,&nbsp;Abdullah Abrizah,&nbsp;David Clark,&nbsp;Blanca Rodríguez-Bravo,&nbsp;Jorge Revez,&nbsp;Eti Herman,&nbsp;Marzena Świgoń,&nbsp;Jie Xu,&nbsp;Anthony Watkinson","doi":"10.1002/leap.2015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper, part of the Harbingers project studying early career researchers (ECRs), focuses on the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on scholarly communications (https://ciber-research.com/harbingers-3/index.html). It investigates citations and citing, its purpose, function and use, especially in respect to reputation, trust, publishing and AI. We also cover journal impact factors, H-index, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar. All of this, regarding a research community, to whom citations have special reputational and career-advancing value. This interview-based study covers a convenience sample of 91 ECRs from all disciplines and half a dozen countries. Furthermore, this study has been conducted with minimal prompting about citations, so providing a fresh feel by using the voices of ECRs wherever possible. Findings include: (1) citations are all-pervasive, although cropping up mostly in the reputational and trust arenas; (2) citations remain a major force in determining what is read, where to publish and what to trust; (3) there are no signs their value is diminishing; if anything, the opposite is true; (4) AI has given a boost to their use—primarily as a validity check; (5) there are strong signs that altmetrics are being taken up. Note, this was a preliminary study working with a convenience sample attempting to inform a future study. Our findings should therefore be treated more as early observations.</p>","PeriodicalId":51636,"journal":{"name":"Learned Publishing","volume":"38 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/leap.2015","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early Career Researchers Open-Up on Citations in Respect to Reputation, Trust, Ethics, AI and Much More\",\"authors\":\"David Nicholas,&nbsp;Abdullah Abrizah,&nbsp;David Clark,&nbsp;Blanca Rodríguez-Bravo,&nbsp;Jorge Revez,&nbsp;Eti Herman,&nbsp;Marzena Świgoń,&nbsp;Jie Xu,&nbsp;Anthony Watkinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/leap.2015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper, part of the Harbingers project studying early career researchers (ECRs), focuses on the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on scholarly communications (https://ciber-research.com/harbingers-3/index.html). It investigates citations and citing, its purpose, function and use, especially in respect to reputation, trust, publishing and AI. We also cover journal impact factors, H-index, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar. All of this, regarding a research community, to whom citations have special reputational and career-advancing value. This interview-based study covers a convenience sample of 91 ECRs from all disciplines and half a dozen countries. Furthermore, this study has been conducted with minimal prompting about citations, so providing a fresh feel by using the voices of ECRs wherever possible. Findings include: (1) citations are all-pervasive, although cropping up mostly in the reputational and trust arenas; (2) citations remain a major force in determining what is read, where to publish and what to trust; (3) there are no signs their value is diminishing; if anything, the opposite is true; (4) AI has given a boost to their use—primarily as a validity check; (5) there are strong signs that altmetrics are being taken up. Note, this was a preliminary study working with a convenience sample attempting to inform a future study. Our findings should therefore be treated more as early observations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learned Publishing\",\"volume\":\"38 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/leap.2015\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learned Publishing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leap.2015\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learned Publishing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leap.2015","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文是研究早期职业研究人员(ecr)的Harbingers项目的一部分,重点关注人工智能(AI)对学术交流的影响(https://ciber-research.com/harbingers-3/index.html)。它调查引用和引用,其目的,功能和用途,特别是在声誉,信任,出版和人工智能方面。我们还涵盖期刊影响因子、h指数、Scopus、Web of Science和谷歌Scholar。所有这一切,对于一个研究社区来说,引文具有特殊的声誉和职业发展价值。这项基于访谈的研究涵盖了来自所有学科和六个国家的91个ecr的方便样本。此外,本研究在进行时对引用的提示很少,因此尽可能使用ecr的声音提供了一种新鲜的感觉。研究发现:(1)论文被引用普遍存在,但主要出现在声誉和信任领域;(2)引文仍然是决定阅读内容、发表内容和信任内容的主要力量;(三)没有价值递减的迹象;如果有的话,事实正好相反;(4)人工智能促进了它们的使用——主要是作为有效性检查;(5)有强烈的迹象表明,替代指标正在被采用。注意,这是一项初步研究,使用方便的样本,试图为未来的研究提供信息。因此,我们的发现应该更多地被视为早期观察。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Early Career Researchers Open-Up on Citations in Respect to Reputation, Trust, Ethics, AI and Much More

This paper, part of the Harbingers project studying early career researchers (ECRs), focuses on the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on scholarly communications (https://ciber-research.com/harbingers-3/index.html). It investigates citations and citing, its purpose, function and use, especially in respect to reputation, trust, publishing and AI. We also cover journal impact factors, H-index, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar. All of this, regarding a research community, to whom citations have special reputational and career-advancing value. This interview-based study covers a convenience sample of 91 ECRs from all disciplines and half a dozen countries. Furthermore, this study has been conducted with minimal prompting about citations, so providing a fresh feel by using the voices of ECRs wherever possible. Findings include: (1) citations are all-pervasive, although cropping up mostly in the reputational and trust arenas; (2) citations remain a major force in determining what is read, where to publish and what to trust; (3) there are no signs their value is diminishing; if anything, the opposite is true; (4) AI has given a boost to their use—primarily as a validity check; (5) there are strong signs that altmetrics are being taken up. Note, this was a preliminary study working with a convenience sample attempting to inform a future study. Our findings should therefore be treated more as early observations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Learned Publishing
Learned Publishing INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
17.90%
发文量
72
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信