David Nicholas, Abdullah Abrizah, David Clark, Blanca Rodríguez-Bravo, Jorge Revez, Eti Herman, Marzena Świgoń, Jie Xu, Anthony Watkinson
{"title":"早期职业研究人员在声誉、信任、道德、人工智能等方面开放引文","authors":"David Nicholas, Abdullah Abrizah, David Clark, Blanca Rodríguez-Bravo, Jorge Revez, Eti Herman, Marzena Świgoń, Jie Xu, Anthony Watkinson","doi":"10.1002/leap.2015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper, part of the Harbingers project studying early career researchers (ECRs), focuses on the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on scholarly communications (https://ciber-research.com/harbingers-3/index.html). It investigates citations and citing, its purpose, function and use, especially in respect to reputation, trust, publishing and AI. We also cover journal impact factors, H-index, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar. All of this, regarding a research community, to whom citations have special reputational and career-advancing value. This interview-based study covers a convenience sample of 91 ECRs from all disciplines and half a dozen countries. Furthermore, this study has been conducted with minimal prompting about citations, so providing a fresh feel by using the voices of ECRs wherever possible. Findings include: (1) citations are all-pervasive, although cropping up mostly in the reputational and trust arenas; (2) citations remain a major force in determining what is read, where to publish and what to trust; (3) there are no signs their value is diminishing; if anything, the opposite is true; (4) AI has given a boost to their use—primarily as a validity check; (5) there are strong signs that altmetrics are being taken up. Note, this was a preliminary study working with a convenience sample attempting to inform a future study. Our findings should therefore be treated more as early observations.</p>","PeriodicalId":51636,"journal":{"name":"Learned Publishing","volume":"38 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/leap.2015","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early Career Researchers Open-Up on Citations in Respect to Reputation, Trust, Ethics, AI and Much More\",\"authors\":\"David Nicholas, Abdullah Abrizah, David Clark, Blanca Rodríguez-Bravo, Jorge Revez, Eti Herman, Marzena Świgoń, Jie Xu, Anthony Watkinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/leap.2015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper, part of the Harbingers project studying early career researchers (ECRs), focuses on the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on scholarly communications (https://ciber-research.com/harbingers-3/index.html). It investigates citations and citing, its purpose, function and use, especially in respect to reputation, trust, publishing and AI. We also cover journal impact factors, H-index, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar. All of this, regarding a research community, to whom citations have special reputational and career-advancing value. This interview-based study covers a convenience sample of 91 ECRs from all disciplines and half a dozen countries. Furthermore, this study has been conducted with minimal prompting about citations, so providing a fresh feel by using the voices of ECRs wherever possible. Findings include: (1) citations are all-pervasive, although cropping up mostly in the reputational and trust arenas; (2) citations remain a major force in determining what is read, where to publish and what to trust; (3) there are no signs their value is diminishing; if anything, the opposite is true; (4) AI has given a boost to their use—primarily as a validity check; (5) there are strong signs that altmetrics are being taken up. Note, this was a preliminary study working with a convenience sample attempting to inform a future study. Our findings should therefore be treated more as early observations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learned Publishing\",\"volume\":\"38 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/leap.2015\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learned Publishing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leap.2015\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learned Publishing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leap.2015","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文是研究早期职业研究人员(ecr)的Harbingers项目的一部分,重点关注人工智能(AI)对学术交流的影响(https://ciber-research.com/harbingers-3/index.html)。它调查引用和引用,其目的,功能和用途,特别是在声誉,信任,出版和人工智能方面。我们还涵盖期刊影响因子、h指数、Scopus、Web of Science和谷歌Scholar。所有这一切,对于一个研究社区来说,引文具有特殊的声誉和职业发展价值。这项基于访谈的研究涵盖了来自所有学科和六个国家的91个ecr的方便样本。此外,本研究在进行时对引用的提示很少,因此尽可能使用ecr的声音提供了一种新鲜的感觉。研究发现:(1)论文被引用普遍存在,但主要出现在声誉和信任领域;(2)引文仍然是决定阅读内容、发表内容和信任内容的主要力量;(三)没有价值递减的迹象;如果有的话,事实正好相反;(4)人工智能促进了它们的使用——主要是作为有效性检查;(5)有强烈的迹象表明,替代指标正在被采用。注意,这是一项初步研究,使用方便的样本,试图为未来的研究提供信息。因此,我们的发现应该更多地被视为早期观察。
Early Career Researchers Open-Up on Citations in Respect to Reputation, Trust, Ethics, AI and Much More
This paper, part of the Harbingers project studying early career researchers (ECRs), focuses on the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on scholarly communications (https://ciber-research.com/harbingers-3/index.html). It investigates citations and citing, its purpose, function and use, especially in respect to reputation, trust, publishing and AI. We also cover journal impact factors, H-index, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar. All of this, regarding a research community, to whom citations have special reputational and career-advancing value. This interview-based study covers a convenience sample of 91 ECRs from all disciplines and half a dozen countries. Furthermore, this study has been conducted with minimal prompting about citations, so providing a fresh feel by using the voices of ECRs wherever possible. Findings include: (1) citations are all-pervasive, although cropping up mostly in the reputational and trust arenas; (2) citations remain a major force in determining what is read, where to publish and what to trust; (3) there are no signs their value is diminishing; if anything, the opposite is true; (4) AI has given a boost to their use—primarily as a validity check; (5) there are strong signs that altmetrics are being taken up. Note, this was a preliminary study working with a convenience sample attempting to inform a future study. Our findings should therefore be treated more as early observations.