敏捷评估,包括采用数字筛选服务的两次实际试验

IF 12.4 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Taavi Tillmann, Andrew Copas, Paul Stokes, Nick Udell, Jo Stead, Jin Lim, Gene Libow
{"title":"敏捷评估,包括采用数字筛选服务的两次实际试验","authors":"Taavi Tillmann, Andrew Copas, Paul Stokes, Nick Udell, Jo Stead, Jin Lim, Gene Libow","doi":"10.1038/s41746-025-01672-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Digital screening may divert lower-risk persons to lower-cost online screening, or offer higher-risk non-responders a more acceptable alternative. Population-based uptake estimates are lacking. We conducted four studies within four weeks by inviting 1700 Londoners (40–74 years, without cardiovascular disease) to a digital Health Check. A six-arm pragmatic unregistered randomised controlled trial (RCT) tested different Short Message Service (SMS) invitations. Uptake varied from 12% (standard SMS) to 20% (shortest SMS, <i>P</i> = 0.009). We tested three sequential reminders (an SMS, a second pragmatic trial [SMS vs postal reminder], and a final SMS). The first SMS reminder increased uptake by +3%. The postal reminder (+7%) was twice as effective as the SMS reminder (+3%, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.0001). The “final reminder” SMS added +7%. Altogether, shorter invites, multi-modal reminders, and a “final reminder” all increased uptake. Adding digital care to in person care may raise uptake from 50 to 60%. Agile evaluations can rapidly improve invitation systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":19349,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Digital Medicine","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Agile evaluation including two pragmatic trials on the uptake of a digital screening service\",\"authors\":\"Taavi Tillmann, Andrew Copas, Paul Stokes, Nick Udell, Jo Stead, Jin Lim, Gene Libow\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41746-025-01672-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Digital screening may divert lower-risk persons to lower-cost online screening, or offer higher-risk non-responders a more acceptable alternative. Population-based uptake estimates are lacking. We conducted four studies within four weeks by inviting 1700 Londoners (40–74 years, without cardiovascular disease) to a digital Health Check. A six-arm pragmatic unregistered randomised controlled trial (RCT) tested different Short Message Service (SMS) invitations. Uptake varied from 12% (standard SMS) to 20% (shortest SMS, <i>P</i> = 0.009). We tested three sequential reminders (an SMS, a second pragmatic trial [SMS vs postal reminder], and a final SMS). The first SMS reminder increased uptake by +3%. The postal reminder (+7%) was twice as effective as the SMS reminder (+3%, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.0001). The “final reminder” SMS added +7%. Altogether, shorter invites, multi-modal reminders, and a “final reminder” all increased uptake. Adding digital care to in person care may raise uptake from 50 to 60%. Agile evaluations can rapidly improve invitation systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NPJ Digital Medicine\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NPJ Digital Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01672-5\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Digital Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01672-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数字筛查可能使低风险人群转向成本更低的在线筛查,或为高风险无应答者提供更可接受的替代方案。缺乏基于人群的摄取估计。我们在四周内进行了四项研究,邀请1700名伦敦人(40-74岁,无心血管疾病)参加数字健康检查。一项六臂实用的未注册随机对照试验(RCT)测试了不同的短信服务(SMS)邀请。使用率从12%(标准短信)到20%(最短短信,P = 0.009)不等。我们测试了三个连续的提醒(一个短信,第二个实用的试验[短信与邮政提醒],最后一个短信)。第一个短信提醒增加了3%的使用率。邮政提醒(+7%)的有效性是短信提醒(+3%,P < 0.0001)的两倍。“最后提醒”短信增加了7%。总之,更短的邀请、多模式提醒和“最后提醒”都增加了用户的接受度。在个人护理中加入数字护理可能会将使用率从50%提高到60%。敏捷评估可以快速改进邀请系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Agile evaluation including two pragmatic trials on the uptake of a digital screening service

Agile evaluation including two pragmatic trials on the uptake of a digital screening service

Digital screening may divert lower-risk persons to lower-cost online screening, or offer higher-risk non-responders a more acceptable alternative. Population-based uptake estimates are lacking. We conducted four studies within four weeks by inviting 1700 Londoners (40–74 years, without cardiovascular disease) to a digital Health Check. A six-arm pragmatic unregistered randomised controlled trial (RCT) tested different Short Message Service (SMS) invitations. Uptake varied from 12% (standard SMS) to 20% (shortest SMS, P = 0.009). We tested three sequential reminders (an SMS, a second pragmatic trial [SMS vs postal reminder], and a final SMS). The first SMS reminder increased uptake by +3%. The postal reminder (+7%) was twice as effective as the SMS reminder (+3%, P < 0.0001). The “final reminder” SMS added +7%. Altogether, shorter invites, multi-modal reminders, and a “final reminder” all increased uptake. Adding digital care to in person care may raise uptake from 50 to 60%. Agile evaluations can rapidly improve invitation systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
170
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Digital Medicine is an online open-access journal that focuses on publishing peer-reviewed research in the field of digital medicine. The journal covers various aspects of digital medicine, including the application and implementation of digital and mobile technologies in clinical settings, virtual healthcare, and the use of artificial intelligence and informatics. The primary goal of the journal is to support innovation and the advancement of healthcare through the integration of new digital and mobile technologies. When determining if a manuscript is suitable for publication, the journal considers four important criteria: novelty, clinical relevance, scientific rigor, and digital innovation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信