美国医学院老年病学教育状况:一项对医学教育院长的全国调查。

Catherine M P Dawson, Amy M Sullivan, Andrea W Schwartz
{"title":"美国医学院老年病学教育状况:一项对医学教育院长的全国调查。","authors":"Catherine M P Dawson, Amy M Sullivan, Andrea W Schwartz","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>National and international organizations recommend that all clinicians attain core skills in caring for older adults. A key first step in devising a broad physician workforce preparedness strategy is assessing the current state of geriatrics medical education. Medical school curriculum leaders are well positioned to provide insight into geriatrics education for US medical students, but studies from recent decades are lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this cross-sectional study, we developed a national survey on geriatrics education, which was disseminated to Medical Education Deans at all 191 accredited allopathic and osteopathic US medical schools in 2021. We present descriptive and inferential statistics for closed-ended questions as well as themes derived from qualitative analysis for open-ended questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey response rate was 73% (140/191). The majority of respondents felt that geriatrics education should be incorporated into medical school curricula, such as in preclinical topics (98%) and through clinical exposure (92%). However, 29% of respondents assessed their school's geriatrics curriculum as \"only a little\" or \"not at all\" developed currently. The four strongest motivators for enhancing geriatrics curricula were identified as: a new accrediting body requirement in geriatrics, curricular funding, institutional support, and faculty championing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Leaders in medical student education report substantial gaps between the current and desired state of geriatrics education at the national level. Our findings hold promise in guiding creative, multipronged approaches to ensure the US physician workforce is well equipped to care for older adults in any setting, from rural outpatient clinics to urban tertiary care centers.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The State of Geriatrics Education at US Medical Schools: A National Survey of Medical Education Deans.\",\"authors\":\"Catherine M P Dawson, Amy M Sullivan, Andrea W Schwartz\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jgs.19530\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>National and international organizations recommend that all clinicians attain core skills in caring for older adults. A key first step in devising a broad physician workforce preparedness strategy is assessing the current state of geriatrics medical education. Medical school curriculum leaders are well positioned to provide insight into geriatrics education for US medical students, but studies from recent decades are lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this cross-sectional study, we developed a national survey on geriatrics education, which was disseminated to Medical Education Deans at all 191 accredited allopathic and osteopathic US medical schools in 2021. We present descriptive and inferential statistics for closed-ended questions as well as themes derived from qualitative analysis for open-ended questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey response rate was 73% (140/191). The majority of respondents felt that geriatrics education should be incorporated into medical school curricula, such as in preclinical topics (98%) and through clinical exposure (92%). However, 29% of respondents assessed their school's geriatrics curriculum as \\\"only a little\\\" or \\\"not at all\\\" developed currently. The four strongest motivators for enhancing geriatrics curricula were identified as: a new accrediting body requirement in geriatrics, curricular funding, institutional support, and faculty championing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Leaders in medical student education report substantial gaps between the current and desired state of geriatrics education at the national level. Our findings hold promise in guiding creative, multipronged approaches to ensure the US physician workforce is well equipped to care for older adults in any setting, from rural outpatient clinics to urban tertiary care centers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19530\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19530","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:国家和国际组织建议所有临床医生获得照顾老年人的核心技能。制定广泛的医生队伍准备战略的关键第一步是评估老年医学教育的现状。医学院的课程领导者很有能力为美国医学生提供老年医学教育的见解,但最近几十年的研究缺乏。方法:在这项横断面研究中,我们开展了一项关于老年医学教育的全国调查,该调查于2021年分发给所有191所经认可的美国对抗疗法和整骨疗法医学院的医学教育院长。我们提出描述性和推理统计封闭的问题,以及从定性分析开放式问题衍生的主题。结果:调查回复率为73%(140/191)。大多数答复者认为老年病学教育应纳入医学院课程,例如临床前主题(98%)和临床接触(92%)。然而,29%的受访者认为他们学校的老年病学课程目前“只有一点点”或“根本没有”发展。加强老年医学课程的四个最强大的动机被确定为:在老年医学新的认证机构的要求,课程资金,机构的支持和教师的支持。结论:医学生教育的领导者报告说,在国家层面上,老年医学教育的现状和期望状态之间存在着巨大的差距。我们的研究结果有望指导创造性的、多管齐下的方法,以确保美国医生队伍在任何环境下都能很好地照顾老年人,从农村门诊诊所到城市三级保健中心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The State of Geriatrics Education at US Medical Schools: A National Survey of Medical Education Deans.

Background: National and international organizations recommend that all clinicians attain core skills in caring for older adults. A key first step in devising a broad physician workforce preparedness strategy is assessing the current state of geriatrics medical education. Medical school curriculum leaders are well positioned to provide insight into geriatrics education for US medical students, but studies from recent decades are lacking.

Methods: For this cross-sectional study, we developed a national survey on geriatrics education, which was disseminated to Medical Education Deans at all 191 accredited allopathic and osteopathic US medical schools in 2021. We present descriptive and inferential statistics for closed-ended questions as well as themes derived from qualitative analysis for open-ended questions.

Results: The survey response rate was 73% (140/191). The majority of respondents felt that geriatrics education should be incorporated into medical school curricula, such as in preclinical topics (98%) and through clinical exposure (92%). However, 29% of respondents assessed their school's geriatrics curriculum as "only a little" or "not at all" developed currently. The four strongest motivators for enhancing geriatrics curricula were identified as: a new accrediting body requirement in geriatrics, curricular funding, institutional support, and faculty championing.

Conclusions: Leaders in medical student education report substantial gaps between the current and desired state of geriatrics education at the national level. Our findings hold promise in guiding creative, multipronged approaches to ensure the US physician workforce is well equipped to care for older adults in any setting, from rural outpatient clinics to urban tertiary care centers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信