臂丛损伤中应用远前骨间神经至短桡腕伸肌神经移植重建腕部伸展。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Harvey Chim, Sami H Tuffaha, Johnny Chuieng-Yi Lu
{"title":"臂丛损伤中应用远前骨间神经至短桡腕伸肌神经移植重建腕部伸展。","authors":"Harvey Chim, Sami H Tuffaha, Johnny Chuieng-Yi Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.04.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Reconstruction of wrist extension in C5-C8 root brachial plexus injuries (BPIs) is challenging, because of limited nerve and tendon donors. The purpose of this study was to report outcomes relating to the pronator quadratus branch of the anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) to extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) nerve transfer from three BP surgeons.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten patients with C5-C8 BPI underwent AIN to ECRB nerve transfer. The mean age of the patients was 30.5 ± 15.9 years. All patients were men. The mean time to nerve surgery following initial injury was 4.5 ± 1.2 months. In all patients, wrist extension was absent at baseline. All patients had a minimum follow-up of 12 months (mean: 28.1 months) after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven of 10 patients achieved Medical Research Council (M) grading system 4 wrist extension. In these patients, mean time to M2 was 12.7 ± 10.1 months, and mean time to M4 was 19.9 ± 10.0 months. The three patients who did not achieve M4 wrist extension had double fascicular transfer and relied strongly on the \"Oberlin effect\" where wrist flexion was required to initiate and achieve antigravity elbow flexion. Additionally, the three patients who did not achieve M4 wrist extension also had longer recovery to achieve antigravity (M3) elbow flexion, all presenting with poorer ability to initiate and achieve elbow flexion independent of the Oberlin effect. None of the patients had loss of forearm pronation after AIN to ECRB nerve transfer.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The AIN to ECRB nerve transfer can effectively reconstruct wrist extension in BPI patients with C5-C8 root injuries. Single fascicular transfer with the ulnar nerve as a donor and avoidance of multiple muscle targets for reinnervation from the median nerve may result in more consistent recovery through this nerve transfer.</p><p><strong>Type of study/level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic V.</p>","PeriodicalId":54815,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wrist Extension Reconstruction Using Distal Anterior Interosseous to Extensor Carpi Radialis Brevis Nerve Transfer in Brachial Plexus Injuries.\",\"authors\":\"Harvey Chim, Sami H Tuffaha, Johnny Chuieng-Yi Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.04.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Reconstruction of wrist extension in C5-C8 root brachial plexus injuries (BPIs) is challenging, because of limited nerve and tendon donors. The purpose of this study was to report outcomes relating to the pronator quadratus branch of the anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) to extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) nerve transfer from three BP surgeons.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten patients with C5-C8 BPI underwent AIN to ECRB nerve transfer. The mean age of the patients was 30.5 ± 15.9 years. All patients were men. The mean time to nerve surgery following initial injury was 4.5 ± 1.2 months. In all patients, wrist extension was absent at baseline. All patients had a minimum follow-up of 12 months (mean: 28.1 months) after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven of 10 patients achieved Medical Research Council (M) grading system 4 wrist extension. In these patients, mean time to M2 was 12.7 ± 10.1 months, and mean time to M4 was 19.9 ± 10.0 months. The three patients who did not achieve M4 wrist extension had double fascicular transfer and relied strongly on the \\\"Oberlin effect\\\" where wrist flexion was required to initiate and achieve antigravity elbow flexion. Additionally, the three patients who did not achieve M4 wrist extension also had longer recovery to achieve antigravity (M3) elbow flexion, all presenting with poorer ability to initiate and achieve elbow flexion independent of the Oberlin effect. None of the patients had loss of forearm pronation after AIN to ECRB nerve transfer.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The AIN to ECRB nerve transfer can effectively reconstruct wrist extension in BPI patients with C5-C8 root injuries. Single fascicular transfer with the ulnar nerve as a donor and avoidance of multiple muscle targets for reinnervation from the median nerve may result in more consistent recovery through this nerve transfer.</p><p><strong>Type of study/level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic V.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54815,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.04.010\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.04.010","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:由于神经和肌腱供体有限,C5-C8根臂丛损伤(BPIs)腕部伸展重建具有挑战性。本研究的目的是报道三位BP外科医生将前骨间神经(AIN)旋前方肌分支转移到桡侧腕短伸肌(ECRB)神经的相关结果。方法:10例C5-C8 BPI患者行AIN - ECRB神经移植。患者平均年龄30.5±15.9岁。所有患者均为男性。初次损伤后神经外科手术平均时间为4.5±1.2个月。所有患者在基线时均无腕关节伸展。所有患者术后至少随访12个月(平均28.1个月)。结果:10例患者中有7例达到医学研究委员会(M)分级系统4级腕部伸展。患者平均到M2的时间为12.7±10.1个月,平均到M4的时间为19.9±10.0个月。3例未实现M4腕关节伸展的患者有双束转移,强烈依赖“Oberlin效应”,需要腕关节屈曲来启动和实现反重力肘关节屈曲。此外,3例未实现M4腕关节伸展的患者实现反重力(M3)肘关节屈曲的恢复时间也较长,均表现出不依赖Oberlin效应而启动和实现肘关节屈曲的能力较差。无一例患者在AIN到ECRB神经移植后前臂旋前丧失。结论:AIN - ECRB神经移植可有效重建伴有C5-C8根损伤的BPI患者的腕关节伸展。以尺神经为供体的单束神经移植,避免正中神经的多肌肉再生目标,可以通过这种神经移植获得更一致的恢复。研究类型/证据水平:治疗性V。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Wrist Extension Reconstruction Using Distal Anterior Interosseous to Extensor Carpi Radialis Brevis Nerve Transfer in Brachial Plexus Injuries.

Purpose: Reconstruction of wrist extension in C5-C8 root brachial plexus injuries (BPIs) is challenging, because of limited nerve and tendon donors. The purpose of this study was to report outcomes relating to the pronator quadratus branch of the anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) to extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) nerve transfer from three BP surgeons.

Methods: Ten patients with C5-C8 BPI underwent AIN to ECRB nerve transfer. The mean age of the patients was 30.5 ± 15.9 years. All patients were men. The mean time to nerve surgery following initial injury was 4.5 ± 1.2 months. In all patients, wrist extension was absent at baseline. All patients had a minimum follow-up of 12 months (mean: 28.1 months) after surgery.

Results: Seven of 10 patients achieved Medical Research Council (M) grading system 4 wrist extension. In these patients, mean time to M2 was 12.7 ± 10.1 months, and mean time to M4 was 19.9 ± 10.0 months. The three patients who did not achieve M4 wrist extension had double fascicular transfer and relied strongly on the "Oberlin effect" where wrist flexion was required to initiate and achieve antigravity elbow flexion. Additionally, the three patients who did not achieve M4 wrist extension also had longer recovery to achieve antigravity (M3) elbow flexion, all presenting with poorer ability to initiate and achieve elbow flexion independent of the Oberlin effect. None of the patients had loss of forearm pronation after AIN to ECRB nerve transfer.

Conclusions: The AIN to ECRB nerve transfer can effectively reconstruct wrist extension in BPI patients with C5-C8 root injuries. Single fascicular transfer with the ulnar nerve as a donor and avoidance of multiple muscle targets for reinnervation from the median nerve may result in more consistent recovery through this nerve transfer.

Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic V.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
10.50%
发文量
402
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Surgery publishes original, peer-reviewed articles related to the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases and conditions of the upper extremity; these include both clinical and basic science studies, along with case reports. Special features include Review Articles (including Current Concepts and The Hand Surgery Landscape), Reviews of Books and Media, and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信