基于性能的前额皮质激活差异:使用功能近红外光谱评估动态射击性能。

Q3 Medicine
Owen F Salmon, Thomas X Statz, Cierra B Ugale, Matthew D Segovia, Joshua R Thompson, Hunter D Dobbs, Rachel M Rauth, Cory M Smith
{"title":"基于性能的前额皮质激活差异:使用功能近红外光谱评估动态射击性能。","authors":"Owen F Salmon, Thomas X Statz, Cierra B Ugale, Matthew D Segovia, Joshua R Thompson, Hunter D Dobbs, Rachel M Rauth, Cory M Smith","doi":"10.55460/4RIR-IM31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Marksmanship is a fundamental skill for all servicemembers. However, the underlying neurophysiological differences in performance among marksmen remain unclear. Incorporating neurophysiological tracking such as functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) may identify performance-based differences in prefrontal cortex (PFC) activation during dynamic marksmanship scenarios. This study examined cognitive load within the PFC during a simulated dynamic marksmanship scenario in non-proficient and proficient marksmen.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-four participants (12 men, 12 women) wore an fNIRS device over their forehead during a simulated stationary pistol marksmanship task (to determine proficiency status) and a dynamic shoot/no-shoot course of fire (COF) (to assess cognitive load). Relative concentrations of oxyhemoglobin (HbO2 ), deoxygenated hemoglobin (deoxygenated Hb), and total hemoglobin (total Hb) were tracked to quantify PFC activation differences in twelve proficient (=80% hit percentage) and twelve non-proficient (<80% hit percentage) marksmen.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No difference in completion time was observed between groups during the dynamic COF (p=.34). However, non-proficient marksmen showed 26.3% higher HbO2 (p=.02) and 42.1% higher total Hb (p<.01) in the PFC compared to proficient marksmen.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tracking PFC hemodynamic activity identified proficiency-based differences in cognitive load during a dynamic COF. Applying fNIRS during marksmanship-related tasks may be useful in developing stress resilience and mission readiness for servicemembers.</p>","PeriodicalId":53630,"journal":{"name":"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals","volume":" ","pages":"15-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance-Based Differences in Prefrontal Cortex Activation: Assessing Dynamic Marksmanship Performance Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy.\",\"authors\":\"Owen F Salmon, Thomas X Statz, Cierra B Ugale, Matthew D Segovia, Joshua R Thompson, Hunter D Dobbs, Rachel M Rauth, Cory M Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.55460/4RIR-IM31\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Marksmanship is a fundamental skill for all servicemembers. However, the underlying neurophysiological differences in performance among marksmen remain unclear. Incorporating neurophysiological tracking such as functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) may identify performance-based differences in prefrontal cortex (PFC) activation during dynamic marksmanship scenarios. This study examined cognitive load within the PFC during a simulated dynamic marksmanship scenario in non-proficient and proficient marksmen.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-four participants (12 men, 12 women) wore an fNIRS device over their forehead during a simulated stationary pistol marksmanship task (to determine proficiency status) and a dynamic shoot/no-shoot course of fire (COF) (to assess cognitive load). Relative concentrations of oxyhemoglobin (HbO2 ), deoxygenated hemoglobin (deoxygenated Hb), and total hemoglobin (total Hb) were tracked to quantify PFC activation differences in twelve proficient (=80% hit percentage) and twelve non-proficient (<80% hit percentage) marksmen.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No difference in completion time was observed between groups during the dynamic COF (p=.34). However, non-proficient marksmen showed 26.3% higher HbO2 (p=.02) and 42.1% higher total Hb (p<.01) in the PFC compared to proficient marksmen.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tracking PFC hemodynamic activity identified proficiency-based differences in cognitive load during a dynamic COF. Applying fNIRS during marksmanship-related tasks may be useful in developing stress resilience and mission readiness for servicemembers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55460/4RIR-IM31\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55460/4RIR-IM31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:枪法是所有军人的基本技能。然而,神射手在射击表现上潜在的神经生理差异尚不清楚。结合神经生理跟踪,如功能性近红外光谱(fNIRS)可以识别动态射击场景中前额皮质(PFC)激活的性能差异。本研究考察了非熟练和熟练射手在模拟动态射击情景下PFC的认知负荷。方法:24名参与者(12名男性,12名女性)在模拟静止手枪射击任务(以确定熟练程度)和动态射击/不射击过程(COF)(以评估认知负荷)期间在额头上佩戴fNIRS装置。追踪12名熟练患者(=80%命中率)和12名非熟练患者的氧合血红蛋白(HbO2)、脱氧血红蛋白(deoxygenated Hb)和总血红蛋白(total Hb)的相对浓度,以量化PFC激活的差异(结果:在动态COF期间,两组之间完成时间没有差异(p= 0.34)。然而,非熟练射手的HbO2高26.3% (p= 0.02),总Hb高42.1% (p)。结论:追踪PFC血流动力学活动可识别动态COF期间认知负荷的熟练程度差异。在枪法相关任务中应用fNIRS可能有助于发展服务人员的压力恢复能力和任务准备能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance-Based Differences in Prefrontal Cortex Activation: Assessing Dynamic Marksmanship Performance Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy.

Introduction: Marksmanship is a fundamental skill for all servicemembers. However, the underlying neurophysiological differences in performance among marksmen remain unclear. Incorporating neurophysiological tracking such as functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) may identify performance-based differences in prefrontal cortex (PFC) activation during dynamic marksmanship scenarios. This study examined cognitive load within the PFC during a simulated dynamic marksmanship scenario in non-proficient and proficient marksmen.

Methods: Twenty-four participants (12 men, 12 women) wore an fNIRS device over their forehead during a simulated stationary pistol marksmanship task (to determine proficiency status) and a dynamic shoot/no-shoot course of fire (COF) (to assess cognitive load). Relative concentrations of oxyhemoglobin (HbO2 ), deoxygenated hemoglobin (deoxygenated Hb), and total hemoglobin (total Hb) were tracked to quantify PFC activation differences in twelve proficient (=80% hit percentage) and twelve non-proficient (<80% hit percentage) marksmen.

Results: No difference in completion time was observed between groups during the dynamic COF (p=.34). However, non-proficient marksmen showed 26.3% higher HbO2 (p=.02) and 42.1% higher total Hb (p<.01) in the PFC compared to proficient marksmen.

Conclusion: Tracking PFC hemodynamic activity identified proficiency-based differences in cognitive load during a dynamic COF. Applying fNIRS during marksmanship-related tasks may be useful in developing stress resilience and mission readiness for servicemembers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信