Lisa Schwab, Stijn De Baets, Emma De Keyser, Timothy Moreels, Jade Tambeur, Patricia De Vriendt
{"title":"人口老龄化中的功能能力和功能能力:范围综述。","authors":"Lisa Schwab, Stijn De Baets, Emma De Keyser, Timothy Moreels, Jade Tambeur, Patricia De Vriendt","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnaf141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The rapidly aging global population brought increasing attention to the concepts of functional capacity (FC) and functional ability (FA), key indicators of health and well-being in older adults. Despite their importance, FC and FA are inconsistently defined, with varying dimensions and measurement approaches. This scoping review clarifies these concepts by summarizing current definitions, mapping their dimensions, identifying assessment tools, and proposing precise operational definitions to guide future research.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>In this scoping review, a search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, and PsycInfo, supplemented by snowball searches of reference lists. Included were studies involving adults aged 60 and older, published after 2015. Definitions, dimensions, and measurement tools of FC and FA were extracted and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 85 included studies, only 16 explicitly defined FC or FA, with significant variability. Four primary dimensions emerged: physical, mental, social, and activities of daily living (ADL). FC predominantly emphasized physical health, while FA focused on ADL independence. Measurement tools were highly diverse, with 97 instruments identified, yet limited adoption of multidimensional approaches.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>The findings highlight the need for standardized definitions and comprehensive, multidimensional assessments of FC and FA. Adopting the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework offers a potential solution to align research and practice. Standardized, holistic approaches to defining and measuring FC and FA are essential to advance research, guide clinical interventions, and support aging-related policy development worldwide.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Functional Capacity and Functional Ability in an Aging Population: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Lisa Schwab, Stijn De Baets, Emma De Keyser, Timothy Moreels, Jade Tambeur, Patricia De Vriendt\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/geront/gnaf141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The rapidly aging global population brought increasing attention to the concepts of functional capacity (FC) and functional ability (FA), key indicators of health and well-being in older adults. Despite their importance, FC and FA are inconsistently defined, with varying dimensions and measurement approaches. This scoping review clarifies these concepts by summarizing current definitions, mapping their dimensions, identifying assessment tools, and proposing precise operational definitions to guide future research.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>In this scoping review, a search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, and PsycInfo, supplemented by snowball searches of reference lists. Included were studies involving adults aged 60 and older, published after 2015. Definitions, dimensions, and measurement tools of FC and FA were extracted and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 85 included studies, only 16 explicitly defined FC or FA, with significant variability. Four primary dimensions emerged: physical, mental, social, and activities of daily living (ADL). FC predominantly emphasized physical health, while FA focused on ADL independence. Measurement tools were highly diverse, with 97 instruments identified, yet limited adoption of multidimensional approaches.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>The findings highlight the need for standardized definitions and comprehensive, multidimensional assessments of FC and FA. Adopting the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework offers a potential solution to align research and practice. Standardized, holistic approaches to defining and measuring FC and FA are essential to advance research, guide clinical interventions, and support aging-related policy development worldwide.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gerontologist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gerontologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf141\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf141","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Functional Capacity and Functional Ability in an Aging Population: A Scoping Review.
Background and objectives: The rapidly aging global population brought increasing attention to the concepts of functional capacity (FC) and functional ability (FA), key indicators of health and well-being in older adults. Despite their importance, FC and FA are inconsistently defined, with varying dimensions and measurement approaches. This scoping review clarifies these concepts by summarizing current definitions, mapping their dimensions, identifying assessment tools, and proposing precise operational definitions to guide future research.
Research design and methods: In this scoping review, a search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, and PsycInfo, supplemented by snowball searches of reference lists. Included were studies involving adults aged 60 and older, published after 2015. Definitions, dimensions, and measurement tools of FC and FA were extracted and analyzed.
Results: Among 85 included studies, only 16 explicitly defined FC or FA, with significant variability. Four primary dimensions emerged: physical, mental, social, and activities of daily living (ADL). FC predominantly emphasized physical health, while FA focused on ADL independence. Measurement tools were highly diverse, with 97 instruments identified, yet limited adoption of multidimensional approaches.
Discussion and implications: The findings highlight the need for standardized definitions and comprehensive, multidimensional assessments of FC and FA. Adopting the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework offers a potential solution to align research and practice. Standardized, holistic approaches to defining and measuring FC and FA are essential to advance research, guide clinical interventions, and support aging-related policy development worldwide.
期刊介绍:
The Gerontologist, published since 1961, is a bimonthly journal of The Gerontological Society of America that provides a multidisciplinary perspective on human aging by publishing research and analysis on applied social issues. It informs the broad community of disciplines and professions involved in understanding the aging process and providing care to older people. Articles should include a conceptual framework and testable hypotheses. Implications for policy or practice should be highlighted. The Gerontologist publishes quantitative and qualitative research and encourages manuscript submissions of various types including: research articles, intervention research, review articles, measurement articles, forums, and brief reports. Book and media reviews, International Spotlights, and award-winning lectures are commissioned by the editors.