Aniket A Kawatkar, Praveen Thokala, Steve Goodacre, Aileen S Baecker, Adam L Sharp, Rita F Redberg, Ming-Sum Lee, Maros Ferencik, Benjamin C Sun
{"title":"早期无创心脏检查对疑似急性冠状动脉综合征的成本-效果。","authors":"Aniket A Kawatkar, Praveen Thokala, Steve Goodacre, Aileen S Baecker, Adam L Sharp, Rita F Redberg, Ming-Sum Lee, Maros Ferencik, Benjamin C Sun","doi":"10.1111/acem.70066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early noninvasive cardiac testing (NIT) is often performed in the initial workup of patients who present to the emergency department (ED) with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Our study objective was to calculate the cost-effectiveness of adopting early NIT for risk stratification to avoid future nonfatal acute myocardial infarction (MI) or death.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To obtain the incremental difference in cost and clinical outcomes, we first conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study within the member population of the Kaiser Permanente Southern California integrated health care delivery system. We then adapted existing cost effectiveness models to generate long-term costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained by NIT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort included 89,387 patients (mean age 57 years, 58% female) and 19% received early NIT. Total cost was higher by $2357 (95% confidence interval [CI] $77 to $4821) for early NIT compared to no early NIT and was mainly due to the increased cost of the index ED visit. Early NIT was associated with lower composite risk of death/nonfatal MI (absolute risk difference -3.7%, 95% CI -4.4% to -3.01%) during a 1-year follow-up. From a payor's perspective, early NIT was cost-effective at $5268/QALYs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with suspected ACS evaluated in the ED, incorporation of early NIT was associated with an overall increase in cost of health care that was driven by increased cost of the initial ED visit. However, due to the significant clinical benefits, early NIT was cost-effective in the low- and intermediate-risk patients while it is a dominant strategy in high-risk patients saving cost and QALYs.</p>","PeriodicalId":7105,"journal":{"name":"Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-effectiveness of early noninvasive cardiac testing for suspected acute coronary syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Aniket A Kawatkar, Praveen Thokala, Steve Goodacre, Aileen S Baecker, Adam L Sharp, Rita F Redberg, Ming-Sum Lee, Maros Ferencik, Benjamin C Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/acem.70066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early noninvasive cardiac testing (NIT) is often performed in the initial workup of patients who present to the emergency department (ED) with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Our study objective was to calculate the cost-effectiveness of adopting early NIT for risk stratification to avoid future nonfatal acute myocardial infarction (MI) or death.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To obtain the incremental difference in cost and clinical outcomes, we first conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study within the member population of the Kaiser Permanente Southern California integrated health care delivery system. We then adapted existing cost effectiveness models to generate long-term costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained by NIT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort included 89,387 patients (mean age 57 years, 58% female) and 19% received early NIT. Total cost was higher by $2357 (95% confidence interval [CI] $77 to $4821) for early NIT compared to no early NIT and was mainly due to the increased cost of the index ED visit. Early NIT was associated with lower composite risk of death/nonfatal MI (absolute risk difference -3.7%, 95% CI -4.4% to -3.01%) during a 1-year follow-up. From a payor's perspective, early NIT was cost-effective at $5268/QALYs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with suspected ACS evaluated in the ED, incorporation of early NIT was associated with an overall increase in cost of health care that was driven by increased cost of the initial ED visit. However, due to the significant clinical benefits, early NIT was cost-effective in the low- and intermediate-risk patients while it is a dominant strategy in high-risk patients saving cost and QALYs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7105,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.70066\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.70066","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:早期无创心脏检查(NIT)通常用于急诊(ED)疑似急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者的初始检查。我们的研究目的是计算采用早期NIT进行风险分层以避免未来非致死性急性心肌梗死(MI)或死亡的成本效益。方法:为了获得成本和临床结果的增量差异,我们首先在Kaiser Permanente南加州综合医疗服务系统的成员人群中进行了一项多中心回顾性队列研究。然后,我们调整了现有的成本效益模型,以产生NIT获得的长期成本和质量调整寿命年(QALYs)。结果:该队列包括89,387例患者(平均年龄57岁,58%为女性),19%接受早期NIT治疗。与不进行NIT相比,早期NIT的总成本高出2357美元(95%置信区间[CI] 77至4821美元),主要是由于索引ED就诊的成本增加。在1年随访期间,早期NIT与较低的死亡/非致死性心肌梗死综合风险相关(绝对风险差-3.7%,95% CI -4.4%至-3.01%)。从付款人的角度来看,早期的NIT成本效益为5268美元/ qaly。结论:在急诊科评估的疑似ACS患者中,纳入早期NIT与初始急诊科就诊费用增加导致的医疗保健费用总体增加有关。然而,由于显著的临床效益,早期NIT在中低风险患者中具有成本效益,而在高风险患者中,它是节省成本和QALYs的主要策略。
Cost-effectiveness of early noninvasive cardiac testing for suspected acute coronary syndrome.
Background: Early noninvasive cardiac testing (NIT) is often performed in the initial workup of patients who present to the emergency department (ED) with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Our study objective was to calculate the cost-effectiveness of adopting early NIT for risk stratification to avoid future nonfatal acute myocardial infarction (MI) or death.
Methods: To obtain the incremental difference in cost and clinical outcomes, we first conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study within the member population of the Kaiser Permanente Southern California integrated health care delivery system. We then adapted existing cost effectiveness models to generate long-term costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained by NIT.
Results: The cohort included 89,387 patients (mean age 57 years, 58% female) and 19% received early NIT. Total cost was higher by $2357 (95% confidence interval [CI] $77 to $4821) for early NIT compared to no early NIT and was mainly due to the increased cost of the index ED visit. Early NIT was associated with lower composite risk of death/nonfatal MI (absolute risk difference -3.7%, 95% CI -4.4% to -3.01%) during a 1-year follow-up. From a payor's perspective, early NIT was cost-effective at $5268/QALYs.
Conclusions: In patients with suspected ACS evaluated in the ED, incorporation of early NIT was associated with an overall increase in cost of health care that was driven by increased cost of the initial ED visit. However, due to the significant clinical benefits, early NIT was cost-effective in the low- and intermediate-risk patients while it is a dominant strategy in high-risk patients saving cost and QALYs.
期刊介绍:
Academic Emergency Medicine (AEM) is the official monthly publication of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) and publishes information relevant to the practice, educational advancements, and investigation of emergency medicine. It is the second-largest peer-reviewed scientific journal in the specialty of emergency medicine.
The goal of AEM is to advance the science, education, and clinical practice of emergency medicine, to serve as a voice for the academic emergency medicine community, and to promote SAEM''s goals and objectives. Members and non-members worldwide depend on this journal for translational medicine relevant to emergency medicine, as well as for clinical news, case studies and more.
Each issue contains information relevant to the research, educational advancements, and practice in emergency medicine. Subject matter is diverse, including preclinical studies, clinical topics, health policy, and educational methods. The research of SAEM members contributes significantly to the scientific content and development of the journal.