{"title":"如何证明预防性植入式心律转复除颤器在晚期轻链淀粉样变性患者中的临床意义","authors":"Naoya Kataoka MD PhD, Teruhiko Imamura MD PhD","doi":"10.1002/joa3.70099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The indication for implantable cardioverter–defibrillator (ICD) implantation in patients with cardiac amyloidosis remains a matter of ongoing debate. Although the incidence of sudden cardiac death in this population is reported to be approximately 10%–30%, the majority of these events appear to result from pulseless electrical activity, which is unresponsive to defibrillation. The authors observed that ventricular arrhythmias were frequently present in patients with advanced light chain (AL) amyloidosis, and that ICD therapy was effective in terminating sustained ventricular arrhythmias in this subgroup.<span><sup>1</sup></span> However, several concerns warrant consideration.</p><p>The current study included only 10 patients with AL amyloidosis, most of whom appeared to exhibit heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Generally, ICD implantation is not recommended for patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction, except for those with cardiac sarcoidosis.<span><sup>2</sup></span> Do the authors advocate ICD implantation in all patients with AL amyloidosis, irrespective of left ventricular function? The cost-effectiveness of such an approach merits careful evaluation.</p><p>Notably, 40% of the cohort received single-chamber ICDs.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Given that patients with cardiac amyloidosis frequently develop supraventricular arrhythmias, such as atrial fibrillation, the potential for inappropriate ICD shocks cannot be overlooked.<span><sup>3</sup></span> It remains unclear whether inappropriate shocks occurred in this cohort.</p><p>Recent studies have highlighted the potential role of catheter ablation in managing ventricular arrhythmias in patients with cardiac amyloidosis.<span><sup>4</sup></span> In light of the authors' finding that appropriate shocks were commonly delivered,<span><sup>1</sup></span> prophylactic catheter ablation may represent a viable alternative strategy. The influence of AL-directed chemotherapy on the incidence and burden of ventricular arrhythmias also deserves further investigation.</p><p>Authors declare no conflict of interests for this article.</p>","PeriodicalId":15174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arrhythmia","volume":"41 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joa3.70099","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How to demonstrate the clinical implication of prophylactic implantable cardioverter–defibrillator in patients with advanced light chain amyloidosis\",\"authors\":\"Naoya Kataoka MD PhD, Teruhiko Imamura MD PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/joa3.70099\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The indication for implantable cardioverter–defibrillator (ICD) implantation in patients with cardiac amyloidosis remains a matter of ongoing debate. Although the incidence of sudden cardiac death in this population is reported to be approximately 10%–30%, the majority of these events appear to result from pulseless electrical activity, which is unresponsive to defibrillation. The authors observed that ventricular arrhythmias were frequently present in patients with advanced light chain (AL) amyloidosis, and that ICD therapy was effective in terminating sustained ventricular arrhythmias in this subgroup.<span><sup>1</sup></span> However, several concerns warrant consideration.</p><p>The current study included only 10 patients with AL amyloidosis, most of whom appeared to exhibit heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Generally, ICD implantation is not recommended for patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction, except for those with cardiac sarcoidosis.<span><sup>2</sup></span> Do the authors advocate ICD implantation in all patients with AL amyloidosis, irrespective of left ventricular function? The cost-effectiveness of such an approach merits careful evaluation.</p><p>Notably, 40% of the cohort received single-chamber ICDs.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Given that patients with cardiac amyloidosis frequently develop supraventricular arrhythmias, such as atrial fibrillation, the potential for inappropriate ICD shocks cannot be overlooked.<span><sup>3</sup></span> It remains unclear whether inappropriate shocks occurred in this cohort.</p><p>Recent studies have highlighted the potential role of catheter ablation in managing ventricular arrhythmias in patients with cardiac amyloidosis.<span><sup>4</sup></span> In light of the authors' finding that appropriate shocks were commonly delivered,<span><sup>1</sup></span> prophylactic catheter ablation may represent a viable alternative strategy. The influence of AL-directed chemotherapy on the incidence and burden of ventricular arrhythmias also deserves further investigation.</p><p>Authors declare no conflict of interests for this article.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Arrhythmia\",\"volume\":\"41 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joa3.70099\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Arrhythmia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joa3.70099\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arrhythmia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joa3.70099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
How to demonstrate the clinical implication of prophylactic implantable cardioverter–defibrillator in patients with advanced light chain amyloidosis
The indication for implantable cardioverter–defibrillator (ICD) implantation in patients with cardiac amyloidosis remains a matter of ongoing debate. Although the incidence of sudden cardiac death in this population is reported to be approximately 10%–30%, the majority of these events appear to result from pulseless electrical activity, which is unresponsive to defibrillation. The authors observed that ventricular arrhythmias were frequently present in patients with advanced light chain (AL) amyloidosis, and that ICD therapy was effective in terminating sustained ventricular arrhythmias in this subgroup.1 However, several concerns warrant consideration.
The current study included only 10 patients with AL amyloidosis, most of whom appeared to exhibit heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.1 Generally, ICD implantation is not recommended for patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction, except for those with cardiac sarcoidosis.2 Do the authors advocate ICD implantation in all patients with AL amyloidosis, irrespective of left ventricular function? The cost-effectiveness of such an approach merits careful evaluation.
Notably, 40% of the cohort received single-chamber ICDs.1 Given that patients with cardiac amyloidosis frequently develop supraventricular arrhythmias, such as atrial fibrillation, the potential for inappropriate ICD shocks cannot be overlooked.3 It remains unclear whether inappropriate shocks occurred in this cohort.
Recent studies have highlighted the potential role of catheter ablation in managing ventricular arrhythmias in patients with cardiac amyloidosis.4 In light of the authors' finding that appropriate shocks were commonly delivered,1 prophylactic catheter ablation may represent a viable alternative strategy. The influence of AL-directed chemotherapy on the incidence and burden of ventricular arrhythmias also deserves further investigation.
Authors declare no conflict of interests for this article.