J. E. Ramón, I. Martínez, J. M. Gandía-Romero, A. Castillo, M. Valcuende
{"title":"基于简易测量单元的混凝土电阻率法现场腐蚀监测——变工况下混凝土的研究","authors":"J. E. Ramón, I. Martínez, J. M. Gandía-Romero, A. Castillo, M. Valcuende","doi":"10.1155/stc/5522124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Concrete resistivity (<i>ρ</i>) is commonly monitored in situ using sensors based on the rebar-disc (RDM) or four-electrode (FEM) methods. This study validates, for the first time in reinforced concrete, an innovative corrosion sensor approach (CSA) previously tested only in simulated pore solutions. The CSA uses a single embedded two-electrode sensor that also allows the corrosion rate, offering a significant advantage for structural health monitoring. CSA resistivity values were broadly consistent with those from established reference methods: 2.9% higher than the RDM and 20% lower than the two-electrode method. Larger differences were observed with the FEM, decreasing when a finite-element cell factor (103%) was applied instead of one for semi-infinite elements (208%). This trend aligns with expected differences between FEM surface resistivity and bulk values. Additionally, a simple correction factor is proposed to normalise <i>ρ</i> to the reference temperature (<i>T</i>) of 20°C, expressed as <i>1</i>/(<i>a·</i>exp((<i>b</i>)·<i>T</i>)), with <i>a</i> and <i>b</i> equal to 1.7251 and 0.027 for low-resistivity concretes and 2.4851 and 0.046 for medium- to high-resistivity concretes. A general model for the full resistivity range yielded <i>a</i> = 2.0687 and <i>b</i> = 0.036. While further research is needed to explore wider corrosion scenarios, the results highlight the potential of the CSA as a practical tool for both laboratory and in situ corrosion assessment.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49471,"journal":{"name":"Structural Control & Health Monitoring","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/stc/5522124","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Concrete Resistivity Method Based on a Simple Measuring Cell for Onsite Corrosion Monitoring: Study on Concrete Under Varying Conditions\",\"authors\":\"J. E. Ramón, I. Martínez, J. M. Gandía-Romero, A. Castillo, M. Valcuende\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/stc/5522124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p>Concrete resistivity (<i>ρ</i>) is commonly monitored in situ using sensors based on the rebar-disc (RDM) or four-electrode (FEM) methods. This study validates, for the first time in reinforced concrete, an innovative corrosion sensor approach (CSA) previously tested only in simulated pore solutions. The CSA uses a single embedded two-electrode sensor that also allows the corrosion rate, offering a significant advantage for structural health monitoring. CSA resistivity values were broadly consistent with those from established reference methods: 2.9% higher than the RDM and 20% lower than the two-electrode method. Larger differences were observed with the FEM, decreasing when a finite-element cell factor (103%) was applied instead of one for semi-infinite elements (208%). This trend aligns with expected differences between FEM surface resistivity and bulk values. Additionally, a simple correction factor is proposed to normalise <i>ρ</i> to the reference temperature (<i>T</i>) of 20°C, expressed as <i>1</i>/(<i>a·</i>exp((<i>b</i>)·<i>T</i>)), with <i>a</i> and <i>b</i> equal to 1.7251 and 0.027 for low-resistivity concretes and 2.4851 and 0.046 for medium- to high-resistivity concretes. A general model for the full resistivity range yielded <i>a</i> = 2.0687 and <i>b</i> = 0.036. While further research is needed to explore wider corrosion scenarios, the results highlight the potential of the CSA as a practical tool for both laboratory and in situ corrosion assessment.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Structural Control & Health Monitoring\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/stc/5522124\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Structural Control & Health Monitoring\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/stc/5522124\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structural Control & Health Monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/stc/5522124","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
混凝土电阻率(ρ)通常使用基于钢筋圆盘(RDM)或四电极(FEM)方法的传感器进行现场监测。本研究首次在钢筋混凝土中验证了一种创新的腐蚀传感器方法(CSA),该方法之前仅在模拟孔隙溶液中进行了测试。CSA采用单个嵌入式双电极传感器,也允许腐蚀速率,为结构健康监测提供了显着优势。CSA电阻率值与现有参考方法基本一致,比RDM法高2.9%,比双电极法低20%。在有限元中观察到较大的差异,当应用有限元单元因子(103%)而不是半无限单元因子(208%)时,差异减小。这种趋势与FEM表面电阻率和体积值之间的预期差异一致。此外,提出了一个简单的校正因子,将ρ归一化为20°C的参考温度(T),表示为1/(a·exp((b)·T)),其中低电阻率混凝土的a和b分别等于1.7251和0.027,中高电阻率混凝土的a和b分别等于2.4851和0.046。全电阻率范围的一般模型得出A = 2.0687, b = 0.036。虽然需要进一步的研究来探索更广泛的腐蚀情况,但结果突出了CSA作为实验室和现场腐蚀评估的实用工具的潜力。
A Concrete Resistivity Method Based on a Simple Measuring Cell for Onsite Corrosion Monitoring: Study on Concrete Under Varying Conditions
Concrete resistivity (ρ) is commonly monitored in situ using sensors based on the rebar-disc (RDM) or four-electrode (FEM) methods. This study validates, for the first time in reinforced concrete, an innovative corrosion sensor approach (CSA) previously tested only in simulated pore solutions. The CSA uses a single embedded two-electrode sensor that also allows the corrosion rate, offering a significant advantage for structural health monitoring. CSA resistivity values were broadly consistent with those from established reference methods: 2.9% higher than the RDM and 20% lower than the two-electrode method. Larger differences were observed with the FEM, decreasing when a finite-element cell factor (103%) was applied instead of one for semi-infinite elements (208%). This trend aligns with expected differences between FEM surface resistivity and bulk values. Additionally, a simple correction factor is proposed to normalise ρ to the reference temperature (T) of 20°C, expressed as 1/(a·exp((b)·T)), with a and b equal to 1.7251 and 0.027 for low-resistivity concretes and 2.4851 and 0.046 for medium- to high-resistivity concretes. A general model for the full resistivity range yielded a = 2.0687 and b = 0.036. While further research is needed to explore wider corrosion scenarios, the results highlight the potential of the CSA as a practical tool for both laboratory and in situ corrosion assessment.
期刊介绍:
The Journal Structural Control and Health Monitoring encompasses all theoretical and technological aspects of structural control, structural health monitoring theory and smart materials and structures. The journal focuses on aerospace, civil, infrastructure and mechanical engineering applications.
Original contributions based on analytical, computational and experimental methods are solicited in three main areas: monitoring, control, and smart materials and structures, covering subjects such as system identification, health monitoring, health diagnostics, multi-functional materials, signal processing, sensor technology, passive, active and semi active control schemes and implementations, shape memory alloys, piezoelectrics and mechatronics.
Also of interest are actuator design, dynamic systems, dynamic stability, artificial intelligence tools, data acquisition, wireless communications, measurements, MEMS/NEMS sensors for local damage detection, optical fibre sensors for health monitoring, remote control of monitoring systems, sensor-logger combinations for mobile applications, corrosion sensors, scour indicators and experimental techniques.