物理治疗实习评估对儿科物理治疗专业学生临床实习表现影响的比较研究

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ting-Ting Ma, Qi Zhang, Hong-Xia Li
{"title":"物理治疗实习评估对儿科物理治疗专业学生临床实习表现影响的比较研究","authors":"Ting-Ting Ma,&nbsp;Qi Zhang,&nbsp;Hong-Xia Li","doi":"10.1111/jep.70128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To investigate how Physical therapy (PT) students’ clinical practice performance is affected by the assessment of physiotherapy practice (APP).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Students enroled at Capital Medical University's Rehabilitation School of Medicine between 2016 and 2019 were included in this study. Students enroled in 2018 and 2019 were assigned to the observation group, while those enroled in 2016 and 2017 were assigned to the control group. The clinical practice model handled by APP tools was given to students in the observation group, whereas the standard clinical practice model was given to students in the control group. Following the practice, students completed a questionnaire survey and took the graduation exam, which consisted of a theoretical examination and a practical examination. The two groups’ performances on these assessments were compared.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The observation group outperformed the control group in both theoretical and practical assessment results (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Following their internship, the observation group showed considerably higher improvements in the acquisition of theoretical knowledge, training in clinical thinking and the operation ability than the control group (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). However, no significant differences were found between the groups in communication skills, teamwork ability, and safety risk management (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The practice teaching model under APP management is superior to the traditional clinical practice model in improving students’ theoretical knowledge, clinical reasoning, and practical skills in pediatric PT. However, both models showed similar outcomes in developing communication skills, teamwork ability, and safety risk management. These findings suggest that APP can be an effective tool for enhancing specific aspects of clinical practice performance in PT education.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Assessment of Physiotherapy Practice on the Clinical Practice Performance of Physical Therapy Students in Pediatrics: A Comparative Study\",\"authors\":\"Ting-Ting Ma,&nbsp;Qi Zhang,&nbsp;Hong-Xia Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jep.70128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To investigate how Physical therapy (PT) students’ clinical practice performance is affected by the assessment of physiotherapy practice (APP).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Students enroled at Capital Medical University's Rehabilitation School of Medicine between 2016 and 2019 were included in this study. Students enroled in 2018 and 2019 were assigned to the observation group, while those enroled in 2016 and 2017 were assigned to the control group. The clinical practice model handled by APP tools was given to students in the observation group, whereas the standard clinical practice model was given to students in the control group. Following the practice, students completed a questionnaire survey and took the graduation exam, which consisted of a theoretical examination and a practical examination. The two groups’ performances on these assessments were compared.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The observation group outperformed the control group in both theoretical and practical assessment results (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Following their internship, the observation group showed considerably higher improvements in the acquisition of theoretical knowledge, training in clinical thinking and the operation ability than the control group (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). However, no significant differences were found between the groups in communication skills, teamwork ability, and safety risk management (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The practice teaching model under APP management is superior to the traditional clinical practice model in improving students’ theoretical knowledge, clinical reasoning, and practical skills in pediatric PT. However, both models showed similar outcomes in developing communication skills, teamwork ability, and safety risk management. These findings suggest that APP can be an effective tool for enhancing specific aspects of clinical practice performance in PT education.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"31 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70128\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70128","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨物理治疗实习(APP)评价对物理治疗(PT)专业学生临床实习成绩的影响。方法以2016 - 2019年首都医科大学康复医学院在校生为研究对象。2018年和2019年入学的学生被分配到观察组,2016年和2017年入学的学生被分配到对照组。观察组学生使用APP工具处理的临床实践模型,对照组学生使用标准临床实践模型。在实践之后,学生们完成了问卷调查,并参加了毕业考试,该考试由理论考试和实践考试组成。比较两组在这些评估中的表现。结果观察组在理论和实践评价结果上均优于对照组(p < 0.05)。实习结束后,观察组在理论知识的获取、临床思维的培养、操作能力的提高均明显高于对照组(p < 0.05)。然而,在沟通能力、团队合作能力和安全风险管理方面,各组间无显著差异(p > 0.05)。结论APP管理下的实践教学模式在提高儿童PT的理论知识、临床推理能力和实践技能方面优于传统的临床实践教学模式,但在培养沟通能力、团队合作能力和安全风险管理能力方面,两种模式的效果相似。这些发现表明APP可以作为一种有效的工具,在PT教育中提高临床实践的特定方面的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effect of Assessment of Physiotherapy Practice on the Clinical Practice Performance of Physical Therapy Students in Pediatrics: A Comparative Study

Objective

To investigate how Physical therapy (PT) students’ clinical practice performance is affected by the assessment of physiotherapy practice (APP).

Methods

Students enroled at Capital Medical University's Rehabilitation School of Medicine between 2016 and 2019 were included in this study. Students enroled in 2018 and 2019 were assigned to the observation group, while those enroled in 2016 and 2017 were assigned to the control group. The clinical practice model handled by APP tools was given to students in the observation group, whereas the standard clinical practice model was given to students in the control group. Following the practice, students completed a questionnaire survey and took the graduation exam, which consisted of a theoretical examination and a practical examination. The two groups’ performances on these assessments were compared.

Results

The observation group outperformed the control group in both theoretical and practical assessment results (p < 0.05). Following their internship, the observation group showed considerably higher improvements in the acquisition of theoretical knowledge, training in clinical thinking and the operation ability than the control group (p < 0.05). However, no significant differences were found between the groups in communication skills, teamwork ability, and safety risk management (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

The practice teaching model under APP management is superior to the traditional clinical practice model in improving students’ theoretical knowledge, clinical reasoning, and practical skills in pediatric PT. However, both models showed similar outcomes in developing communication skills, teamwork ability, and safety risk management. These findings suggest that APP can be an effective tool for enhancing specific aspects of clinical practice performance in PT education.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信