{"title":"物理治疗实习评估对儿科物理治疗专业学生临床实习表现影响的比较研究","authors":"Ting-Ting Ma, Qi Zhang, Hong-Xia Li","doi":"10.1111/jep.70128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To investigate how Physical therapy (PT) students’ clinical practice performance is affected by the assessment of physiotherapy practice (APP).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Students enroled at Capital Medical University's Rehabilitation School of Medicine between 2016 and 2019 were included in this study. Students enroled in 2018 and 2019 were assigned to the observation group, while those enroled in 2016 and 2017 were assigned to the control group. The clinical practice model handled by APP tools was given to students in the observation group, whereas the standard clinical practice model was given to students in the control group. Following the practice, students completed a questionnaire survey and took the graduation exam, which consisted of a theoretical examination and a practical examination. The two groups’ performances on these assessments were compared.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The observation group outperformed the control group in both theoretical and practical assessment results (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Following their internship, the observation group showed considerably higher improvements in the acquisition of theoretical knowledge, training in clinical thinking and the operation ability than the control group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). However, no significant differences were found between the groups in communication skills, teamwork ability, and safety risk management (<i>p</i> > 0.05).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The practice teaching model under APP management is superior to the traditional clinical practice model in improving students’ theoretical knowledge, clinical reasoning, and practical skills in pediatric PT. However, both models showed similar outcomes in developing communication skills, teamwork ability, and safety risk management. These findings suggest that APP can be an effective tool for enhancing specific aspects of clinical practice performance in PT education.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Assessment of Physiotherapy Practice on the Clinical Practice Performance of Physical Therapy Students in Pediatrics: A Comparative Study\",\"authors\":\"Ting-Ting Ma, Qi Zhang, Hong-Xia Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jep.70128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To investigate how Physical therapy (PT) students’ clinical practice performance is affected by the assessment of physiotherapy practice (APP).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Students enroled at Capital Medical University's Rehabilitation School of Medicine between 2016 and 2019 were included in this study. Students enroled in 2018 and 2019 were assigned to the observation group, while those enroled in 2016 and 2017 were assigned to the control group. The clinical practice model handled by APP tools was given to students in the observation group, whereas the standard clinical practice model was given to students in the control group. Following the practice, students completed a questionnaire survey and took the graduation exam, which consisted of a theoretical examination and a practical examination. The two groups’ performances on these assessments were compared.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The observation group outperformed the control group in both theoretical and practical assessment results (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Following their internship, the observation group showed considerably higher improvements in the acquisition of theoretical knowledge, training in clinical thinking and the operation ability than the control group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). However, no significant differences were found between the groups in communication skills, teamwork ability, and safety risk management (<i>p</i> > 0.05).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The practice teaching model under APP management is superior to the traditional clinical practice model in improving students’ theoretical knowledge, clinical reasoning, and practical skills in pediatric PT. However, both models showed similar outcomes in developing communication skills, teamwork ability, and safety risk management. These findings suggest that APP can be an effective tool for enhancing specific aspects of clinical practice performance in PT education.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"31 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70128\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70128","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Effect of Assessment of Physiotherapy Practice on the Clinical Practice Performance of Physical Therapy Students in Pediatrics: A Comparative Study
Objective
To investigate how Physical therapy (PT) students’ clinical practice performance is affected by the assessment of physiotherapy practice (APP).
Methods
Students enroled at Capital Medical University's Rehabilitation School of Medicine between 2016 and 2019 were included in this study. Students enroled in 2018 and 2019 were assigned to the observation group, while those enroled in 2016 and 2017 were assigned to the control group. The clinical practice model handled by APP tools was given to students in the observation group, whereas the standard clinical practice model was given to students in the control group. Following the practice, students completed a questionnaire survey and took the graduation exam, which consisted of a theoretical examination and a practical examination. The two groups’ performances on these assessments were compared.
Results
The observation group outperformed the control group in both theoretical and practical assessment results (p < 0.05). Following their internship, the observation group showed considerably higher improvements in the acquisition of theoretical knowledge, training in clinical thinking and the operation ability than the control group (p < 0.05). However, no significant differences were found between the groups in communication skills, teamwork ability, and safety risk management (p > 0.05).
Conclusions
The practice teaching model under APP management is superior to the traditional clinical practice model in improving students’ theoretical knowledge, clinical reasoning, and practical skills in pediatric PT. However, both models showed similar outcomes in developing communication skills, teamwork ability, and safety risk management. These findings suggest that APP can be an effective tool for enhancing specific aspects of clinical practice performance in PT education.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.