一种由一组仿射界定义的设计空间灵活性评估的新框架

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Diogo A.C. Narciso , Steven Sachio , Maria M. Papathanasiou
{"title":"一种由一组仿射界定义的设计空间灵活性评估的新框架","authors":"Diogo A.C. Narciso ,&nbsp;Steven Sachio ,&nbsp;Maria M. Papathanasiou","doi":"10.1016/j.compchemeng.2025.109189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A novel framework for flexibility assessment in the context of system design is proposed. We deal with the case when the design space is bounded by a set of affine bounds defining a convex-hull. For this class of problems several flexibility metrics can be calculated, which are related to the minimum/maximum distances between any point in the design space and the less/most distant points at its bounds, respectively. In the first case, the distance functions are obtained via projection to individual bounds, and in the second case, the distance functions are defined via the Euclidean distance to the corners of convex hulls. These two sets of functions can then be used separately to calculate the minimum/maximum of the complete set of minimum/maximum distance functions over the full design space. This approach effectively enables the definition of four multi-parametric programming problems, and deliver four flexibility maps from their solutions. Flexibility maps based on the average of the two sets of distance functions are also delivered. This offers a plethora of complementary metrics for flexibility assessment, which extend beyond the classic approach based on the definition of feasible boxes. From the full set of solutions enabled by this framework, the minimum–minimum and maximum–maximum distance-based flexibility maps stand out as the extreme and most useful cases for flexibility assessment; the initial experimentation with these maps suggest that the average-minimum and particularly the average-maximum distance cases also provide useful information as an overall score on flexibility for any points within the design space.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":286,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Chemical Engineering","volume":"200 ","pages":"Article 109189"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A novel framework for flexibility assessment in design spaces defined by a set of affine bounds\",\"authors\":\"Diogo A.C. Narciso ,&nbsp;Steven Sachio ,&nbsp;Maria M. Papathanasiou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compchemeng.2025.109189\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>A novel framework for flexibility assessment in the context of system design is proposed. We deal with the case when the design space is bounded by a set of affine bounds defining a convex-hull. For this class of problems several flexibility metrics can be calculated, which are related to the minimum/maximum distances between any point in the design space and the less/most distant points at its bounds, respectively. In the first case, the distance functions are obtained via projection to individual bounds, and in the second case, the distance functions are defined via the Euclidean distance to the corners of convex hulls. These two sets of functions can then be used separately to calculate the minimum/maximum of the complete set of minimum/maximum distance functions over the full design space. This approach effectively enables the definition of four multi-parametric programming problems, and deliver four flexibility maps from their solutions. Flexibility maps based on the average of the two sets of distance functions are also delivered. This offers a plethora of complementary metrics for flexibility assessment, which extend beyond the classic approach based on the definition of feasible boxes. From the full set of solutions enabled by this framework, the minimum–minimum and maximum–maximum distance-based flexibility maps stand out as the extreme and most useful cases for flexibility assessment; the initial experimentation with these maps suggest that the average-minimum and particularly the average-maximum distance cases also provide useful information as an overall score on flexibility for any points within the design space.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers & Chemical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"200 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109189\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers & Chemical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0098135425001930\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0098135425001930","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

提出了一种新的系统设计柔性评估框架。我们处理的情况下,当设计空间是由一组仿射界界定一个凸壳。对于这类问题,可以计算几个灵活性指标,它们分别与设计空间中任何点与边界上较短/最远点之间的最小/最大距离有关。在第一种情况下,距离函数通过投影到各个边界来获得,在第二种情况下,距离函数通过到凸壳角的欧几里得距离来定义。然后可以分别使用这两组函数来计算整个设计空间上的最小/最大距离函数集的最小/最大值。这种方法有效地定义了四个多参数规划问题,并从它们的解决方案中提供了四个灵活性映射。还提供了基于两组距离函数平均值的灵活性图。这为灵活性评估提供了大量的补充度量,这些度量超出了基于可行框定义的经典方法。在该框架支持的全套解决方案中,基于最小-最小和最大-最大距离的灵活性图作为灵活性评估的极端和最有用的案例脱颖而出;这些地图的初始实验表明,平均最小距离,特别是平均最大距离的情况也提供了有用的信息,作为设计空间中任何点的灵活性的总体得分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A novel framework for flexibility assessment in design spaces defined by a set of affine bounds
A novel framework for flexibility assessment in the context of system design is proposed. We deal with the case when the design space is bounded by a set of affine bounds defining a convex-hull. For this class of problems several flexibility metrics can be calculated, which are related to the minimum/maximum distances between any point in the design space and the less/most distant points at its bounds, respectively. In the first case, the distance functions are obtained via projection to individual bounds, and in the second case, the distance functions are defined via the Euclidean distance to the corners of convex hulls. These two sets of functions can then be used separately to calculate the minimum/maximum of the complete set of minimum/maximum distance functions over the full design space. This approach effectively enables the definition of four multi-parametric programming problems, and deliver four flexibility maps from their solutions. Flexibility maps based on the average of the two sets of distance functions are also delivered. This offers a plethora of complementary metrics for flexibility assessment, which extend beyond the classic approach based on the definition of feasible boxes. From the full set of solutions enabled by this framework, the minimum–minimum and maximum–maximum distance-based flexibility maps stand out as the extreme and most useful cases for flexibility assessment; the initial experimentation with these maps suggest that the average-minimum and particularly the average-maximum distance cases also provide useful information as an overall score on flexibility for any points within the design space.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Chemical Engineering
Computers & Chemical Engineering 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
14.00%
发文量
374
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Computers & Chemical Engineering is primarily a journal of record for new developments in the application of computing and systems technology to chemical engineering problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信