从分数到策略:德克萨斯州基于绩效的交通规划

IF 2 4区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Eun Hak Lee , Jolanda Prozzi , P. Grace Tee Lewis , Maia Draper , Bumsik Kim
{"title":"从分数到策略:德克萨斯州基于绩效的交通规划","authors":"Eun Hak Lee ,&nbsp;Jolanda Prozzi ,&nbsp;P. Grace Tee Lewis ,&nbsp;Maia Draper ,&nbsp;Bumsik Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With the rise of advanced mobility data collection technologies, there has been growing interest in performance-based planning and programming. As a result, transportation agencies are increasingly using multiple metrics to evaluate system performance. However, relying on multiple indicators can complicate decision-making, highlighting the need for a single, consolidated performance score. This study evaluates the performance of the transportation system in Texas using a data envelopment analysis model. The analysis incorporates six performance metrics aligned with five planning goals outlined in Texas Unified Transportation Program. The decision-making unit was set as census tracts, and the transportation score was defined as the relative performance of the six metrics in comparison to population and land area. The results showed that the transportation score across 5265 census tracts was estimated to be 0.52 on average. This suggests that an average improvement of 0.48 is needed across census tracts to reach the optimal transportation score of 1.00. Additionally, the impact of six metrics on estimated transportation score was identified using the Tobit regression model. The proposed framework contributes to the transportation planning process by combining multiple metrics into a single score and providing both performance rankings and actionable insights for system improvement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48046,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation and Program Planning","volume":"111 ","pages":"Article 102611"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From scores to strategy: Performance-based transportation planning in Texas\",\"authors\":\"Eun Hak Lee ,&nbsp;Jolanda Prozzi ,&nbsp;P. Grace Tee Lewis ,&nbsp;Maia Draper ,&nbsp;Bumsik Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102611\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>With the rise of advanced mobility data collection technologies, there has been growing interest in performance-based planning and programming. As a result, transportation agencies are increasingly using multiple metrics to evaluate system performance. However, relying on multiple indicators can complicate decision-making, highlighting the need for a single, consolidated performance score. This study evaluates the performance of the transportation system in Texas using a data envelopment analysis model. The analysis incorporates six performance metrics aligned with five planning goals outlined in Texas Unified Transportation Program. The decision-making unit was set as census tracts, and the transportation score was defined as the relative performance of the six metrics in comparison to population and land area. The results showed that the transportation score across 5265 census tracts was estimated to be 0.52 on average. This suggests that an average improvement of 0.48 is needed across census tracts to reach the optimal transportation score of 1.00. Additionally, the impact of six metrics on estimated transportation score was identified using the Tobit regression model. The proposed framework contributes to the transportation planning process by combining multiple metrics into a single score and providing both performance rankings and actionable insights for system improvement.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evaluation and Program Planning\",\"volume\":\"111 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102611\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evaluation and Program Planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718925000783\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation and Program Planning","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718925000783","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着先进的移动数据收集技术的兴起,人们对基于性能的规划和编程越来越感兴趣。因此,运输机构越来越多地使用多种指标来评估系统性能。然而,依赖多个指标可能会使决策复杂化,突出了对单一、综合绩效评分的需求。本研究使用数据包络分析模型评估了德克萨斯州交通系统的性能。该分析结合了六个性能指标,与德克萨斯州统一运输计划中概述的五个规划目标相一致。决策单位被设定为人口普查区,交通得分被定义为六个指标与人口和土地面积的相对表现。结果表明,5265个人口普查区的交通得分平均为0.52。这表明,要达到最优交通得分1.00,各人口普查区平均需要提高0.48分。此外,使用Tobit回归模型确定了六个指标对估计交通得分的影响。拟议的框架通过将多个指标合并为一个分数,并提供性能排名和系统改进的可操作见解,从而有助于交通规划过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From scores to strategy: Performance-based transportation planning in Texas
With the rise of advanced mobility data collection technologies, there has been growing interest in performance-based planning and programming. As a result, transportation agencies are increasingly using multiple metrics to evaluate system performance. However, relying on multiple indicators can complicate decision-making, highlighting the need for a single, consolidated performance score. This study evaluates the performance of the transportation system in Texas using a data envelopment analysis model. The analysis incorporates six performance metrics aligned with five planning goals outlined in Texas Unified Transportation Program. The decision-making unit was set as census tracts, and the transportation score was defined as the relative performance of the six metrics in comparison to population and land area. The results showed that the transportation score across 5265 census tracts was estimated to be 0.52 on average. This suggests that an average improvement of 0.48 is needed across census tracts to reach the optimal transportation score of 1.00. Additionally, the impact of six metrics on estimated transportation score was identified using the Tobit regression model. The proposed framework contributes to the transportation planning process by combining multiple metrics into a single score and providing both performance rankings and actionable insights for system improvement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evaluation and Program Planning
Evaluation and Program Planning SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: Evaluation and Program Planning is based on the principle that the techniques and methods of evaluation and planning transcend the boundaries of specific fields and that relevant contributions to these areas come from people representing many different positions, intellectual traditions, and interests. In order to further the development of evaluation and planning, we publish articles from the private and public sectors in a wide range of areas: organizational development and behavior, training, planning, human resource development, health and mental, social services, mental retardation, corrections, substance abuse, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信