利用机器学习进行土壤液化评估

Gamze Maden Muftuoglu , Kaveh Dehghanian
{"title":"利用机器学习进行土壤液化评估","authors":"Gamze Maden Muftuoglu ,&nbsp;Kaveh Dehghanian","doi":"10.1016/j.aiig.2025.100122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Liquefaction is one of the prominent factors leading to damage to soil and structures. In this study, the relationship between liquefaction potential and soil parameters is determined by applying feature importance methods to Random Forest (RF), Logistic Regression (LR), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Support Vector Machine (SVM) and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithms. Feature importance methods consist of permutation and Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) importances along with the used model's built-in feature importance method if it exists. These suggested approaches incorporate an extensive dataset of geotechnical parameters, historical liquefaction events, and soil properties. The feature set comprises 18 parameters that are gathered from 161 field cases. Algorithms are used to determine the optimum performance feature set. Compared to other approaches, the study assesses how well these algorithms predict soil liquefaction potential. Early findings show that the algorithms perform well, demonstrating their capacity to identify non-linear connections and improve prediction accuracy. Among the feature set, <em>σ</em><sup><em>,</em></sup><sub><em>v</em></sub> (<em>psf</em>), MSF, <em>CSR</em><sub><em>σ,</em></sub> <sub><em>v</em></sub>, FC%, V<sub>s∗,40f</sub> <sub>t</sub>(f ps) and <em>N</em><sub>1<em>,</em>60<em>,CS</em></sub> are the ones that have the highest deterministic power on the result. The study's contribution is that, in the absence of extensive data for liquefaction assessment, the proposed method estimates the liquefaction potential using five parameters with promising accuracy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100124,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence in Geosciences","volume":"6 1","pages":"Article 100122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Soil liquefaction assessment using machine learning\",\"authors\":\"Gamze Maden Muftuoglu ,&nbsp;Kaveh Dehghanian\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aiig.2025.100122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Liquefaction is one of the prominent factors leading to damage to soil and structures. In this study, the relationship between liquefaction potential and soil parameters is determined by applying feature importance methods to Random Forest (RF), Logistic Regression (LR), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Support Vector Machine (SVM) and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithms. Feature importance methods consist of permutation and Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) importances along with the used model's built-in feature importance method if it exists. These suggested approaches incorporate an extensive dataset of geotechnical parameters, historical liquefaction events, and soil properties. The feature set comprises 18 parameters that are gathered from 161 field cases. Algorithms are used to determine the optimum performance feature set. Compared to other approaches, the study assesses how well these algorithms predict soil liquefaction potential. Early findings show that the algorithms perform well, demonstrating their capacity to identify non-linear connections and improve prediction accuracy. Among the feature set, <em>σ</em><sup><em>,</em></sup><sub><em>v</em></sub> (<em>psf</em>), MSF, <em>CSR</em><sub><em>σ,</em></sub> <sub><em>v</em></sub>, FC%, V<sub>s∗,40f</sub> <sub>t</sub>(f ps) and <em>N</em><sub>1<em>,</em>60<em>,CS</em></sub> are the ones that have the highest deterministic power on the result. The study's contribution is that, in the absence of extensive data for liquefaction assessment, the proposed method estimates the liquefaction potential using five parameters with promising accuracy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100124,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Artificial Intelligence in Geosciences\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Artificial Intelligence in Geosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666544125000188\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence in Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666544125000188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

液化是导致土壤和结构破坏的重要因素之一。在本研究中,通过将特征重要性方法应用于随机森林(RF)、逻辑回归(LR)、多层感知器(MLP)、支持向量机(SVM)和极端梯度增强(XGBoost)算法来确定液化势与土壤参数之间的关系。特征重要性方法包括置换和Shapley加性解释(SHAP)重要性,以及使用的模型内置的特征重要性方法(如果存在)。这些建议的方法包括岩土参数,历史液化事件和土壤特性的广泛数据集。该特性集包括从161个现场案例中收集的18个参数。采用算法确定最优性能特征集。与其他方法相比,该研究评估了这些算法预测土壤液化潜力的能力。早期的研究结果表明,这些算法表现良好,证明了它们识别非线性连接和提高预测精度的能力。在特征集中,σ,v (psf), MSF, CSRσ, v, FC%, Vs∗,40f t(f ps)和N1,60,CS对结果具有最高的确定性。该研究的贡献在于,在缺乏液化评估的大量数据的情况下,所提出的方法使用五个参数来估计液化潜力,具有很好的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Soil liquefaction assessment using machine learning
Liquefaction is one of the prominent factors leading to damage to soil and structures. In this study, the relationship between liquefaction potential and soil parameters is determined by applying feature importance methods to Random Forest (RF), Logistic Regression (LR), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Support Vector Machine (SVM) and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithms. Feature importance methods consist of permutation and Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) importances along with the used model's built-in feature importance method if it exists. These suggested approaches incorporate an extensive dataset of geotechnical parameters, historical liquefaction events, and soil properties. The feature set comprises 18 parameters that are gathered from 161 field cases. Algorithms are used to determine the optimum performance feature set. Compared to other approaches, the study assesses how well these algorithms predict soil liquefaction potential. Early findings show that the algorithms perform well, demonstrating their capacity to identify non-linear connections and improve prediction accuracy. Among the feature set, σ,v (psf), MSF, CSRσ, v, FC%, Vs∗,40f t(f ps) and N1,60,CS are the ones that have the highest deterministic power on the result. The study's contribution is that, in the absence of extensive data for liquefaction assessment, the proposed method estimates the liquefaction potential using five parameters with promising accuracy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信