动态预约重新安排与患者的偏好

IF 6 2区 管理学 Q1 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Tine Meersman, Broos Maenhout, Dieter Fiems
{"title":"动态预约重新安排与患者的偏好","authors":"Tine Meersman, Broos Maenhout, Dieter Fiems","doi":"10.1016/j.ejor.2025.05.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines patient-initiated appointment rescheduling with consideration of patient preferences. Online rescheduling policies are investigated for the selection and sequential offering of new appointments upon the arrival of a rescheduling request via a telephone call. Appointments are offered until the patient accepts one or the maximum number of offers is reached. The aim is to reschedule appointments using a weighted function to maximise the patients’ satisfaction, optimise the operational performance, and minimise the number of patients deferred to a future time horizon. Different patient types are taken into account characterised by their uncertainties in rescheduling, cancellation, no-show, and service duration. The rescheduling process is formulated as a stochastic dynamic scheduling problem and approximated using a Markov Decision Process (MDP). Two heuristic policies are proposed, referred to as the myopic stochastic and the MDP-based algorithms. Both policies apply a simulation-optimisation approach that considers patient preferences and expected operational performance. To determine the set of offered appointments, the MDP-based algorithm additionally accounts for expected future rescheduling requests. Computational experiments are performed on real-life instances. The results demonstrate that the two proposed policies yield solutions of high quality. The myopic stochastic policy outperforms the MDP-based policy when it is challenging to offer suitable slots due to high capacity utilisation or a lack of clear patient preferences. Conversely, the MDP-based algorithm delivers better results when capacity utilisation is lower and there is some variation in preferences across days and patients.","PeriodicalId":55161,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Operational Research","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dynamic appointment rescheduling with patient preferences\",\"authors\":\"Tine Meersman, Broos Maenhout, Dieter Fiems\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejor.2025.05.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examines patient-initiated appointment rescheduling with consideration of patient preferences. Online rescheduling policies are investigated for the selection and sequential offering of new appointments upon the arrival of a rescheduling request via a telephone call. Appointments are offered until the patient accepts one or the maximum number of offers is reached. The aim is to reschedule appointments using a weighted function to maximise the patients’ satisfaction, optimise the operational performance, and minimise the number of patients deferred to a future time horizon. Different patient types are taken into account characterised by their uncertainties in rescheduling, cancellation, no-show, and service duration. The rescheduling process is formulated as a stochastic dynamic scheduling problem and approximated using a Markov Decision Process (MDP). Two heuristic policies are proposed, referred to as the myopic stochastic and the MDP-based algorithms. Both policies apply a simulation-optimisation approach that considers patient preferences and expected operational performance. To determine the set of offered appointments, the MDP-based algorithm additionally accounts for expected future rescheduling requests. Computational experiments are performed on real-life instances. The results demonstrate that the two proposed policies yield solutions of high quality. The myopic stochastic policy outperforms the MDP-based policy when it is challenging to offer suitable slots due to high capacity utilisation or a lack of clear patient preferences. Conversely, the MDP-based algorithm delivers better results when capacity utilisation is lower and there is some variation in preferences across days and patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Operational Research\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Operational Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2025.05.005\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Operational Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2025.05.005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察了考虑患者偏好的患者发起的预约重新安排。在通过电话提出重新安排请求时,对在线重新安排策略的选择和顺序提供进行了调查。预约一直持续到病人接受一次或达到预约的最大次数。其目的是使用加权函数重新安排预约,以最大限度地提高患者满意度,优化运营绩效,并最大限度地减少推迟到未来时间范围的患者数量。考虑到不同的患者类型在重新安排、取消、缺席和服务时间方面的不确定性。将重调度过程描述为随机动态调度问题,并使用马尔可夫决策过程(MDP)进行近似。提出了两种启发式策略,即近视随机算法和基于mdp的算法。这两种策略都采用了考虑患者偏好和预期操作性能的模拟优化方法。为了确定提供的约会集,基于mdp的算法还考虑了预期的未来重新调度请求。计算实验是在现实生活中进行的。结果表明,这两种政策都能产生高质量的解决方案。当由于高容量利用率或缺乏明确的患者偏好而难以提供合适的插槽时,近视随机策略优于基于mdp的策略。相反,当容量利用率较低,并且不同天数和患者的偏好有所不同时,基于mdp的算法会提供更好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dynamic appointment rescheduling with patient preferences
This study examines patient-initiated appointment rescheduling with consideration of patient preferences. Online rescheduling policies are investigated for the selection and sequential offering of new appointments upon the arrival of a rescheduling request via a telephone call. Appointments are offered until the patient accepts one or the maximum number of offers is reached. The aim is to reschedule appointments using a weighted function to maximise the patients’ satisfaction, optimise the operational performance, and minimise the number of patients deferred to a future time horizon. Different patient types are taken into account characterised by their uncertainties in rescheduling, cancellation, no-show, and service duration. The rescheduling process is formulated as a stochastic dynamic scheduling problem and approximated using a Markov Decision Process (MDP). Two heuristic policies are proposed, referred to as the myopic stochastic and the MDP-based algorithms. Both policies apply a simulation-optimisation approach that considers patient preferences and expected operational performance. To determine the set of offered appointments, the MDP-based algorithm additionally accounts for expected future rescheduling requests. Computational experiments are performed on real-life instances. The results demonstrate that the two proposed policies yield solutions of high quality. The myopic stochastic policy outperforms the MDP-based policy when it is challenging to offer suitable slots due to high capacity utilisation or a lack of clear patient preferences. Conversely, the MDP-based algorithm delivers better results when capacity utilisation is lower and there is some variation in preferences across days and patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Operational Research
European Journal of Operational Research 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
9.40%
发文量
786
审稿时长
8.2 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Operational Research (EJOR) publishes high quality, original papers that contribute to the methodology of operational research (OR) and to the practice of decision making.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信