使用三种可选的体外测试方法组合检测医疗器械材料中的皮肤致敏危害。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 TOXICOLOGY
Masayuki Okada, Harumi Tabata, Keiki Suzuki, Atsushi Kaneki
{"title":"使用三种可选的体外测试方法组合检测医疗器械材料中的皮肤致敏危害。","authors":"Masayuki Okada,&nbsp;Harumi Tabata,&nbsp;Keiki Suzuki,&nbsp;Atsushi Kaneki","doi":"10.1016/j.tiv.2025.106084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study attempted to detect the skin sensitization hazards of medical device materials by combining multiple <em>in vitro</em> alternative testing methods. Nine materials were extracted using organic solvents, and the re-dissolved solutions were evaluated using the Amino acid Derivative Reactivity Assay (ADRA), Epidermal Sensitization Assay (EpiSensA), and human Cell Line Activation test (h-CLAT). The combined results of each test were compared with those of the Guinea Pig Maximization Test (GPMT) results. The findings of ADRA and h-CLAT were consistent with the GPMT results for seven of the nine materials, and EpiSensA was consistent with the GPMT results for eight of the nine materials. The findings of the “2 out of 3” and Sequential Testing Strategy (STS) approaches were compared with the GPMT results. The GMPT results for all nine materials were correctly predicted when the “2 out of 3” approach was used. When the STS was used, it correctly predicted the GMPT results for eight of the nine materials. Therefore, integrating the ADRA, EpiSensA, and h-CLAT may provide an effective testing method for detecting skin sensitization hazards of organic solvent extracts from medical device materials.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54423,"journal":{"name":"Toxicology in Vitro","volume":"108 ","pages":"Article 106084"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detection of skin sensitization hazards in medical device materials using a combination of three alternative in vitro testing methods\",\"authors\":\"Masayuki Okada,&nbsp;Harumi Tabata,&nbsp;Keiki Suzuki,&nbsp;Atsushi Kaneki\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tiv.2025.106084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study attempted to detect the skin sensitization hazards of medical device materials by combining multiple <em>in vitro</em> alternative testing methods. Nine materials were extracted using organic solvents, and the re-dissolved solutions were evaluated using the Amino acid Derivative Reactivity Assay (ADRA), Epidermal Sensitization Assay (EpiSensA), and human Cell Line Activation test (h-CLAT). The combined results of each test were compared with those of the Guinea Pig Maximization Test (GPMT) results. The findings of ADRA and h-CLAT were consistent with the GPMT results for seven of the nine materials, and EpiSensA was consistent with the GPMT results for eight of the nine materials. The findings of the “2 out of 3” and Sequential Testing Strategy (STS) approaches were compared with the GPMT results. The GMPT results for all nine materials were correctly predicted when the “2 out of 3” approach was used. When the STS was used, it correctly predicted the GMPT results for eight of the nine materials. Therefore, integrating the ADRA, EpiSensA, and h-CLAT may provide an effective testing method for detecting skin sensitization hazards of organic solvent extracts from medical device materials.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Toxicology in Vitro\",\"volume\":\"108 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106084\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Toxicology in Vitro\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887233325000785\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicology in Vitro","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887233325000785","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究试图结合多种体外替代测试方法检测医疗器械材料的皮肤致敏危害。采用有机溶剂提取9种材料,用氨基酸衍生物反应活性测定(ADRA)、表皮致敏试验(EpiSensA)和人细胞系激活试验(h-CLAT)对再溶解溶液进行评价。将各试验的综合结果与豚鼠最大化试验(GPMT)结果进行比较。ADRA和h-CLAT的结果与9种材料中的7种材料的GPMT结果一致,EpiSensA与9种材料中的8种材料的GPMT结果一致。将“2 / 3”和顺序测试策略(STS)方法的结果与GPMT结果进行比较。当使用“2 / 3”方法时,所有九种材料的GMPT结果都被正确预测。当使用STS时,它正确地预测了9种材料中的8种的GMPT结果。因此,将ADRA、EpiSensA和h-CLAT结合起来,可能为检测医疗器械材料有机溶剂提取物的皮肤致敏危害提供一种有效的检测方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Detection of skin sensitization hazards in medical device materials using a combination of three alternative in vitro testing methods
This study attempted to detect the skin sensitization hazards of medical device materials by combining multiple in vitro alternative testing methods. Nine materials were extracted using organic solvents, and the re-dissolved solutions were evaluated using the Amino acid Derivative Reactivity Assay (ADRA), Epidermal Sensitization Assay (EpiSensA), and human Cell Line Activation test (h-CLAT). The combined results of each test were compared with those of the Guinea Pig Maximization Test (GPMT) results. The findings of ADRA and h-CLAT were consistent with the GPMT results for seven of the nine materials, and EpiSensA was consistent with the GPMT results for eight of the nine materials. The findings of the “2 out of 3” and Sequential Testing Strategy (STS) approaches were compared with the GPMT results. The GMPT results for all nine materials were correctly predicted when the “2 out of 3” approach was used. When the STS was used, it correctly predicted the GMPT results for eight of the nine materials. Therefore, integrating the ADRA, EpiSensA, and h-CLAT may provide an effective testing method for detecting skin sensitization hazards of organic solvent extracts from medical device materials.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Toxicology in Vitro
Toxicology in Vitro 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.10%
发文量
181
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: Toxicology in Vitro publishes original research papers and reviews on the application and use of in vitro systems for assessing or predicting the toxic effects of chemicals and elucidating their mechanisms of action. These in vitro techniques include utilizing cell or tissue cultures, isolated cells, tissue slices, subcellular fractions, transgenic cell cultures, and cells from transgenic organisms, as well as in silico modelling. The Journal will focus on investigations that involve the development and validation of new in vitro methods, e.g. for prediction of toxic effects based on traditional and in silico modelling; on the use of methods in high-throughput toxicology and pharmacology; elucidation of mechanisms of toxic action; the application of genomics, transcriptomics and proteomics in toxicology, as well as on comparative studies that characterise the relationship between in vitro and in vivo findings. The Journal strongly encourages the submission of manuscripts that focus on the development of in vitro methods, their practical applications and regulatory use (e.g. in the areas of food components cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, pesticides, and industrial chemicals). Toxicology in Vitro discourages papers that record reporting on toxicological effects from materials, such as plant extracts or herbal medicines, that have not been chemically characterized.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信