{"title":"使用三种可选的体外测试方法组合检测医疗器械材料中的皮肤致敏危害。","authors":"Masayuki Okada, Harumi Tabata, Keiki Suzuki, Atsushi Kaneki","doi":"10.1016/j.tiv.2025.106084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study attempted to detect the skin sensitization hazards of medical device materials by combining multiple <em>in vitro</em> alternative testing methods. Nine materials were extracted using organic solvents, and the re-dissolved solutions were evaluated using the Amino acid Derivative Reactivity Assay (ADRA), Epidermal Sensitization Assay (EpiSensA), and human Cell Line Activation test (h-CLAT). The combined results of each test were compared with those of the Guinea Pig Maximization Test (GPMT) results. The findings of ADRA and h-CLAT were consistent with the GPMT results for seven of the nine materials, and EpiSensA was consistent with the GPMT results for eight of the nine materials. The findings of the “2 out of 3” and Sequential Testing Strategy (STS) approaches were compared with the GPMT results. The GMPT results for all nine materials were correctly predicted when the “2 out of 3” approach was used. When the STS was used, it correctly predicted the GMPT results for eight of the nine materials. Therefore, integrating the ADRA, EpiSensA, and h-CLAT may provide an effective testing method for detecting skin sensitization hazards of organic solvent extracts from medical device materials.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54423,"journal":{"name":"Toxicology in Vitro","volume":"108 ","pages":"Article 106084"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detection of skin sensitization hazards in medical device materials using a combination of three alternative in vitro testing methods\",\"authors\":\"Masayuki Okada, Harumi Tabata, Keiki Suzuki, Atsushi Kaneki\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tiv.2025.106084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study attempted to detect the skin sensitization hazards of medical device materials by combining multiple <em>in vitro</em> alternative testing methods. Nine materials were extracted using organic solvents, and the re-dissolved solutions were evaluated using the Amino acid Derivative Reactivity Assay (ADRA), Epidermal Sensitization Assay (EpiSensA), and human Cell Line Activation test (h-CLAT). The combined results of each test were compared with those of the Guinea Pig Maximization Test (GPMT) results. The findings of ADRA and h-CLAT were consistent with the GPMT results for seven of the nine materials, and EpiSensA was consistent with the GPMT results for eight of the nine materials. The findings of the “2 out of 3” and Sequential Testing Strategy (STS) approaches were compared with the GPMT results. The GMPT results for all nine materials were correctly predicted when the “2 out of 3” approach was used. When the STS was used, it correctly predicted the GMPT results for eight of the nine materials. Therefore, integrating the ADRA, EpiSensA, and h-CLAT may provide an effective testing method for detecting skin sensitization hazards of organic solvent extracts from medical device materials.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Toxicology in Vitro\",\"volume\":\"108 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106084\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Toxicology in Vitro\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887233325000785\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicology in Vitro","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887233325000785","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Detection of skin sensitization hazards in medical device materials using a combination of three alternative in vitro testing methods
This study attempted to detect the skin sensitization hazards of medical device materials by combining multiple in vitro alternative testing methods. Nine materials were extracted using organic solvents, and the re-dissolved solutions were evaluated using the Amino acid Derivative Reactivity Assay (ADRA), Epidermal Sensitization Assay (EpiSensA), and human Cell Line Activation test (h-CLAT). The combined results of each test were compared with those of the Guinea Pig Maximization Test (GPMT) results. The findings of ADRA and h-CLAT were consistent with the GPMT results for seven of the nine materials, and EpiSensA was consistent with the GPMT results for eight of the nine materials. The findings of the “2 out of 3” and Sequential Testing Strategy (STS) approaches were compared with the GPMT results. The GMPT results for all nine materials were correctly predicted when the “2 out of 3” approach was used. When the STS was used, it correctly predicted the GMPT results for eight of the nine materials. Therefore, integrating the ADRA, EpiSensA, and h-CLAT may provide an effective testing method for detecting skin sensitization hazards of organic solvent extracts from medical device materials.
期刊介绍:
Toxicology in Vitro publishes original research papers and reviews on the application and use of in vitro systems for assessing or predicting the toxic effects of chemicals and elucidating their mechanisms of action. These in vitro techniques include utilizing cell or tissue cultures, isolated cells, tissue slices, subcellular fractions, transgenic cell cultures, and cells from transgenic organisms, as well as in silico modelling. The Journal will focus on investigations that involve the development and validation of new in vitro methods, e.g. for prediction of toxic effects based on traditional and in silico modelling; on the use of methods in high-throughput toxicology and pharmacology; elucidation of mechanisms of toxic action; the application of genomics, transcriptomics and proteomics in toxicology, as well as on comparative studies that characterise the relationship between in vitro and in vivo findings. The Journal strongly encourages the submission of manuscripts that focus on the development of in vitro methods, their practical applications and regulatory use (e.g. in the areas of food components cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, pesticides, and industrial chemicals). Toxicology in Vitro discourages papers that record reporting on toxicological effects from materials, such as plant extracts or herbal medicines, that have not been chemically characterized.