实施健康数据收集的社会和行为决定因素:来自实用试验的见解。

IF 4.1 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Kriyana P Reddy, Saania Mirpuri, Cara L Berkowitz, Elizabeth M de Jesus, Sarah B Hulse, Julia T Lewandowski, Kerry Q Coughlin, Merium L Burwell, Robin Evans, Jennifer Galetta, Sharon Rivera Sanchez, Trudy L Buckingham, Victoria Livingstone, Anne Marie McCarthy, Peter E Gabriel, Christine E Edmonds, Tamara J Cadet, Oluwadamilola M Fayanju
{"title":"实施健康数据收集的社会和行为决定因素:来自实用试验的见解。","authors":"Kriyana P Reddy, Saania Mirpuri, Cara L Berkowitz, Elizabeth M de Jesus, Sarah B Hulse, Julia T Lewandowski, Kerry Q Coughlin, Merium L Burwell, Robin Evans, Jennifer Galetta, Sharon Rivera Sanchez, Trudy L Buckingham, Victoria Livingstone, Anne Marie McCarthy, Peter E Gabriel, Christine E Edmonds, Tamara J Cadet, Oluwadamilola M Fayanju","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkaf040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In response to growing evidence and recognition that social and behavioral determinants of health (SBDOH) differentially affect the health-care experiences and outcomes of patients with cancer, there has been an increased focus on optimizing the routine collection of such data. In spring 2024, we launched a pragmatic clinical trial titled \"Effect of Early Point-of-Service Social and Behavioral Determinants of Health (SBDOH) Screening and Enhanced Navigation on Care Delivery for Patients With Breast Cancer\" (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT06019988) at our academic health system. Instruments and modalities were selected following a process of collaborative and iterative consensus building that included an in-person discovery workshop with patients, national experts in psychometrics and SBDOH collection, health system leadership, faculty and staff stakeholders, and study sponsors. The final protocol, which used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, follows a stepped-wedge cluster-randomized format and compares 3 SBDOH screening instruments-Accountable Health Communities Health-Related Social Needs Screening Tool, Health Leads Social Screening Tool, and the National Comprehensive Care Network Distress Thermometer and Problem List-and 3 delivery modalities-the Epic electronic health record patient portal; bidirectional text-based conversational agent (\"chatbot\"), and interactive voice response administered by phone. Despite substantial resources, multidisciplinary collaboration, and advanced planning, we encountered challenges related to patient navigation, stakeholder engagement, and technological integration. We describe our experience as a guide for others aspiring to realize real-world implementation of routine SBDOH data collection.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12107698/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementing social and behavioral determinants of health data collection: insights from a pragmatic trial.\",\"authors\":\"Kriyana P Reddy, Saania Mirpuri, Cara L Berkowitz, Elizabeth M de Jesus, Sarah B Hulse, Julia T Lewandowski, Kerry Q Coughlin, Merium L Burwell, Robin Evans, Jennifer Galetta, Sharon Rivera Sanchez, Trudy L Buckingham, Victoria Livingstone, Anne Marie McCarthy, Peter E Gabriel, Christine E Edmonds, Tamara J Cadet, Oluwadamilola M Fayanju\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jncics/pkaf040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In response to growing evidence and recognition that social and behavioral determinants of health (SBDOH) differentially affect the health-care experiences and outcomes of patients with cancer, there has been an increased focus on optimizing the routine collection of such data. In spring 2024, we launched a pragmatic clinical trial titled \\\"Effect of Early Point-of-Service Social and Behavioral Determinants of Health (SBDOH) Screening and Enhanced Navigation on Care Delivery for Patients With Breast Cancer\\\" (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT06019988) at our academic health system. Instruments and modalities were selected following a process of collaborative and iterative consensus building that included an in-person discovery workshop with patients, national experts in psychometrics and SBDOH collection, health system leadership, faculty and staff stakeholders, and study sponsors. The final protocol, which used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, follows a stepped-wedge cluster-randomized format and compares 3 SBDOH screening instruments-Accountable Health Communities Health-Related Social Needs Screening Tool, Health Leads Social Screening Tool, and the National Comprehensive Care Network Distress Thermometer and Problem List-and 3 delivery modalities-the Epic electronic health record patient portal; bidirectional text-based conversational agent (\\\"chatbot\\\"), and interactive voice response administered by phone. Despite substantial resources, multidisciplinary collaboration, and advanced planning, we encountered challenges related to patient navigation, stakeholder engagement, and technological integration. We describe our experience as a guide for others aspiring to realize real-world implementation of routine SBDOH data collection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JNCI Cancer Spectrum\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12107698/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JNCI Cancer Spectrum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkaf040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkaf040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着越来越多的证据和认识到健康的社会和行为决定因素(SBDOH)对癌症患者的医疗保健经历和结果有不同的影响,人们越来越关注优化SBDOH数据的常规收集。在2024年春季,我们启动了一项实用的临床试验,“早期服务点健康的社会和行为决定因素(SBDOH)筛查和增强导航对乳腺癌患者护理服务的影响”(NCT06019988)。通过协作和反复建立共识的过程,选择了工具和模式,其中包括与患者、心理测量学和SBDOH收集方面的国家专家、卫生系统领导、教职员工利益相关者和研究赞助商进行面对面的发现研讨会。最终方案采用了实施研究综合框架(CFIR),采用楔形步进聚类随机形式,并比较了SBDOH的三种筛查工具——负责任的健康社区与健康相关的社会需求筛查工具(AHC-HRSN)、健康领导社会筛查工具(健康领导)、以及国家综合护理网络窘迫温度计和问题清单(NCCN DT) -以及三种交付模式- Epic®电子健康记录(EHR)患者门户;双向文本会话代理(“聊天机器人”),以及电话管理的交互式语音应答(IVR)。尽管有大量的资源、多学科合作和先进的计划,我们还是遇到了与患者导航、利益相关者参与和技术集成相关的挑战。我们将我们的经验描述为其他渴望实现常规化SBDOH数据收集的实际实现的人的指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Implementing social and behavioral determinants of health data collection: insights from a pragmatic trial.

Implementing social and behavioral determinants of health data collection: insights from a pragmatic trial.

Implementing social and behavioral determinants of health data collection: insights from a pragmatic trial.

In response to growing evidence and recognition that social and behavioral determinants of health (SBDOH) differentially affect the health-care experiences and outcomes of patients with cancer, there has been an increased focus on optimizing the routine collection of such data. In spring 2024, we launched a pragmatic clinical trial titled "Effect of Early Point-of-Service Social and Behavioral Determinants of Health (SBDOH) Screening and Enhanced Navigation on Care Delivery for Patients With Breast Cancer" (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT06019988) at our academic health system. Instruments and modalities were selected following a process of collaborative and iterative consensus building that included an in-person discovery workshop with patients, national experts in psychometrics and SBDOH collection, health system leadership, faculty and staff stakeholders, and study sponsors. The final protocol, which used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, follows a stepped-wedge cluster-randomized format and compares 3 SBDOH screening instruments-Accountable Health Communities Health-Related Social Needs Screening Tool, Health Leads Social Screening Tool, and the National Comprehensive Care Network Distress Thermometer and Problem List-and 3 delivery modalities-the Epic electronic health record patient portal; bidirectional text-based conversational agent ("chatbot"), and interactive voice response administered by phone. Despite substantial resources, multidisciplinary collaboration, and advanced planning, we encountered challenges related to patient navigation, stakeholder engagement, and technological integration. We describe our experience as a guide for others aspiring to realize real-world implementation of routine SBDOH data collection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
JNCI Cancer Spectrum Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信