Ilaria Ruotolo, Andrea Carenza, Giovanni Sellitto, Rachele Simeon, Francescaroberta Panuccio, Andrea Marini Padovani, Emanuele Amadio, Alessandro Ugolini, Anna Berardi, Giovanni Galeoto
{"title":"探索疲劳严重程度量表的心理测量特性：来自系统回顾和可靠性荟萃分析的结果。","authors":"Ilaria Ruotolo, Andrea Carenza, Giovanni Sellitto, Rachele Simeon, Francescaroberta Panuccio, Andrea Marini Padovani, Emanuele Amadio, Alessandro Ugolini, Anna Berardi, Giovanni Galeoto","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2025.2511128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Fatigue is a multifactorial phenomenon that affects individuals across several conditions. Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) is a widely used questionnaire to measure perceived fatigue. This systematic review aims to identify the psychometric properties of FSS across different populations where it has been validated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study selection process was conducted from April 2024 to January 2025. The databases used to identify included studies were MEDLINE (via PubMed), SCOPUS, Web of Science, and CINAHL (via EBSCO). The risk of bias was evaluated using the COSMIN checklist. For the meta-analysis, studies reporting the internal consistency of the scale were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the end of the selection process, 59 articles were included in the review; the sample sizes ranged from 20 to 2017 participants, and the mean age spanned from 21,86 to 68,1 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The FSS is a valid and reliable instrument for fatigue assessment. It would be desirable to investigate heterogeneity; it would be beneficial to investigate responsiveness and to explore the settings in which it is used. Another advise would be to calculate cutoff in healthy subjects to better understand fatigue symptoms and the differences in perception between populations.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>PROSPERO (CRD42025635211).</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the psychometric properties of the fatigue severity scale: results from a systematic review and reliability meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ilaria Ruotolo, Andrea Carenza, Giovanni Sellitto, Rachele Simeon, Francescaroberta Panuccio, Andrea Marini Padovani, Emanuele Amadio, Alessandro Ugolini, Anna Berardi, Giovanni Galeoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14737167.2025.2511128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Fatigue is a multifactorial phenomenon that affects individuals across several conditions. Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) is a widely used questionnaire to measure perceived fatigue. This systematic review aims to identify the psychometric properties of FSS across different populations where it has been validated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study selection process was conducted from April 2024 to January 2025. The databases used to identify included studies were MEDLINE (via PubMed), SCOPUS, Web of Science, and CINAHL (via EBSCO). The risk of bias was evaluated using the COSMIN checklist. For the meta-analysis, studies reporting the internal consistency of the scale were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the end of the selection process, 59 articles were included in the review; the sample sizes ranged from 20 to 2017 participants, and the mean age spanned from 21,86 to 68,1 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The FSS is a valid and reliable instrument for fatigue assessment. It would be desirable to investigate heterogeneity; it would be beneficial to investigate responsiveness and to explore the settings in which it is used. Another advise would be to calculate cutoff in healthy subjects to better understand fatigue symptoms and the differences in perception between populations.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>PROSPERO (CRD42025635211).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2025.2511128\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2025.2511128","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介：疲劳是一种多因素现象，它会在多种情况下影响个体。疲劳严重程度量表（FSS）是一种广泛使用的测量感知疲劳的问卷。本系统综述旨在确定FSS在不同人群中已被验证的心理测量特性。方法：研究选择过程于2024年4月至2025年1月进行。用于确定纳入研究的数据库有MEDLINE（通过PubMed）、SCOPUS、Web of Science和CINAHL（通过EBSCO）。使用COSMIN检查表评估偏倚风险。对于meta分析，报告量表内部一致性的研究进行了分析。结果：在选择过程结束时，59篇文章被纳入综述；样本量从20人到2017人不等，平均年龄从21.86岁到68.1岁不等。结论：FSS是一种有效、可靠的疲劳评估工具。研究异质性是可取的；调查响应性和探索使用响应性的环境将是有益的。另一个建议是计算健康受试者的截止时间，以更好地了解疲劳症状和人群之间的感知差异。注册：普洛斯彼罗（CRD42025635211）。
Exploring the psychometric properties of the fatigue severity scale: results from a systematic review and reliability meta-analysis.
Introduction: Fatigue is a multifactorial phenomenon that affects individuals across several conditions. Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) is a widely used questionnaire to measure perceived fatigue. This systematic review aims to identify the psychometric properties of FSS across different populations where it has been validated.
Methods: The study selection process was conducted from April 2024 to January 2025. The databases used to identify included studies were MEDLINE (via PubMed), SCOPUS, Web of Science, and CINAHL (via EBSCO). The risk of bias was evaluated using the COSMIN checklist. For the meta-analysis, studies reporting the internal consistency of the scale were analyzed.
Results: At the end of the selection process, 59 articles were included in the review; the sample sizes ranged from 20 to 2017 participants, and the mean age spanned from 21,86 to 68,1 years.
Conclusion: The FSS is a valid and reliable instrument for fatigue assessment. It would be desirable to investigate heterogeneity; it would be beneficial to investigate responsiveness and to explore the settings in which it is used. Another advise would be to calculate cutoff in healthy subjects to better understand fatigue symptoms and the differences in perception between populations.
期刊介绍：
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research (ISSN 1473-7167) provides expert reviews on cost-benefit and pharmacoeconomic issues relating to the clinical use of drugs and therapeutic approaches. Coverage includes pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life research, therapeutic outcomes, evidence-based medicine and cost-benefit research. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review.
The journal adopts the unique Expert Review article format, offering a complete overview of current thinking in a key technology area, research or clinical practice, augmented by the following sections:
Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results
Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
