输血独立性与低风险骨髓增生异常综合征患者的生存率相对应:来自美国保险索赔的真实世界证据。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Rami S Komrokji, Dylan Supina, Shyamala Navada, Ravi Potluri, Rohit Tyagi, Tim Werwath, Zhuoer Xie, Eric Padron, David A Sallman
{"title":"输血独立性与低风险骨髓增生异常综合征患者的生存率相对应:来自美国保险索赔的真实世界证据。","authors":"Rami S Komrokji, Dylan Supina, Shyamala Navada, Ravi Potluri, Rohit Tyagi, Tim Werwath, Zhuoer Xie, Eric Padron, David A Sallman","doi":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.04.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (LR-MDS) develop red blood cell transfusion dependence (RBC-TD). RBC-TD has been associated with decreased quality of life and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study assessed association between RBC-TD and survival using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD.10), codes and patterns of MDS medication from a large US health insurance claims database (October 2015-March 2023) in 6531 patients who received ≥1 line of treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent and hypomethylating agent monotherapy were treatments most commonly used in first-line (1L) and second-line (2L) settings. At baseline, 8% of patients had high transfusion burden (≥8 RBC U/8 weeks). In 1L and 2L, ≥16-week RBC transfusion independence (TI) was achieved by 41% (n = 935/2301) and 32% (n = 239/745) of patients, respectively. Median real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS; time from start of treatment to next treatment or progression/death, whichever occurred first) and median OS (mOS) were significantly longer in ≥16-week RBC-TI responders than nonresponders. Median (95% confidence interval [CI]) rwPFS in 1L responders versus nonresponders was 18.0 months (17.0-19.3) versus 3.3 months (3.0-3.5; P < .0001), respectively, and was 20.5 months (17.6-23.7) versus 4.1 months (3.7-4.6; P < .0001), respectively, in 2L. mOS (95% CI) in 1L responders versus nonresponders was 28.7 months (26.1-31.6) versus 8.0 months (7.0-9.1; P < .0001), respectively, and 45.2 months (35.9-49.8) versus 9.0 months (7.6-10.6; P < .0001), respectively, in 2L. RBC-TI achievement was associated with improved survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results suggest RBC-TD may be a modifiable factor corresponding to clinical outcomes in LR-MDS, further supporting RBC-TI as a primary endpoint in clinical studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10348,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transfusion Independence Corresponds With Survival in Patients With Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome: Real-World Evidence From United States Insurance Claims.\",\"authors\":\"Rami S Komrokji, Dylan Supina, Shyamala Navada, Ravi Potluri, Rohit Tyagi, Tim Werwath, Zhuoer Xie, Eric Padron, David A Sallman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clml.2025.04.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (LR-MDS) develop red blood cell transfusion dependence (RBC-TD). RBC-TD has been associated with decreased quality of life and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study assessed association between RBC-TD and survival using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD.10), codes and patterns of MDS medication from a large US health insurance claims database (October 2015-March 2023) in 6531 patients who received ≥1 line of treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent and hypomethylating agent monotherapy were treatments most commonly used in first-line (1L) and second-line (2L) settings. At baseline, 8% of patients had high transfusion burden (≥8 RBC U/8 weeks). In 1L and 2L, ≥16-week RBC transfusion independence (TI) was achieved by 41% (n = 935/2301) and 32% (n = 239/745) of patients, respectively. Median real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS; time from start of treatment to next treatment or progression/death, whichever occurred first) and median OS (mOS) were significantly longer in ≥16-week RBC-TI responders than nonresponders. Median (95% confidence interval [CI]) rwPFS in 1L responders versus nonresponders was 18.0 months (17.0-19.3) versus 3.3 months (3.0-3.5; P < .0001), respectively, and was 20.5 months (17.6-23.7) versus 4.1 months (3.7-4.6; P < .0001), respectively, in 2L. mOS (95% CI) in 1L responders versus nonresponders was 28.7 months (26.1-31.6) versus 8.0 months (7.0-9.1; P < .0001), respectively, and 45.2 months (35.9-49.8) versus 9.0 months (7.6-10.6; P < .0001), respectively, in 2L. RBC-TI achievement was associated with improved survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results suggest RBC-TD may be a modifiable factor corresponding to clinical outcomes in LR-MDS, further supporting RBC-TI as a primary endpoint in clinical studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2025.04.014\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2025.04.014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:大多数低风险骨髓增生异常综合征(LR-MDS)患者会发生红细胞输血依赖(RBC-TD)。RBC-TD与生活质量和总生存率(OS)下降有关。方法:本研究使用国际疾病分类第十版(ICD.10)、来自美国大型健康保险索赔数据库(2015年10月- 2023年3月)的MDS用药代码和模式评估了6531名接受≥1种治疗方案的患者的RBC-TD与生存率之间的关系。结果:促红细胞生成剂和低甲基化剂单药治疗是一线(1L)和二线(2L)最常用的治疗方法。在基线时,8%的患者有高输血负担(≥8 RBC U/8周)。在1L和2L组,分别有41% (n = 935/2301)和32% (n = 239/745)的患者达到≥16周的RBC输血独立性(TI)。真实世界无进展生存期(rwPFS;从开始治疗到下一次治疗或进展/死亡(以先发生者为准)和中位OS (mOS)在≥16周的RBC-TI应答者中明显长于无应答者。1L应答者和无应答者的rwPFS中位数(95%置信区间[CI])为18.0个月(17.0-19.3)比3.3个月(3.0-3.5;P < 0.0001),分别为20.5个月(17.6-23.7)和4.1个月(3.7-4.6;P < 0.0001)。1L应答者和无应答者的mOS (95% CI)分别为28.7个月(26.1-31.6)和8.0个月(7.0-9.1;P < 0.0001),分别为45.2个月(35.9-49.8)和9.0个月(7.6-10.6;P < 0.0001)。RBC-TI达标与生存率提高相关。结论:结果提示,RBC-TD可能是一个可改变的因素,与LR-MDS的临床结果相对应,进一步支持RBC-TI作为临床研究的主要终点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transfusion Independence Corresponds With Survival in Patients With Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome: Real-World Evidence From United States Insurance Claims.

Background: Most patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (LR-MDS) develop red blood cell transfusion dependence (RBC-TD). RBC-TD has been associated with decreased quality of life and overall survival (OS).

Methods: This study assessed association between RBC-TD and survival using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD.10), codes and patterns of MDS medication from a large US health insurance claims database (October 2015-March 2023) in 6531 patients who received ≥1 line of treatment.

Results: Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent and hypomethylating agent monotherapy were treatments most commonly used in first-line (1L) and second-line (2L) settings. At baseline, 8% of patients had high transfusion burden (≥8 RBC U/8 weeks). In 1L and 2L, ≥16-week RBC transfusion independence (TI) was achieved by 41% (n = 935/2301) and 32% (n = 239/745) of patients, respectively. Median real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS; time from start of treatment to next treatment or progression/death, whichever occurred first) and median OS (mOS) were significantly longer in ≥16-week RBC-TI responders than nonresponders. Median (95% confidence interval [CI]) rwPFS in 1L responders versus nonresponders was 18.0 months (17.0-19.3) versus 3.3 months (3.0-3.5; P < .0001), respectively, and was 20.5 months (17.6-23.7) versus 4.1 months (3.7-4.6; P < .0001), respectively, in 2L. mOS (95% CI) in 1L responders versus nonresponders was 28.7 months (26.1-31.6) versus 8.0 months (7.0-9.1; P < .0001), respectively, and 45.2 months (35.9-49.8) versus 9.0 months (7.6-10.6; P < .0001), respectively, in 2L. RBC-TI achievement was associated with improved survival.

Conclusions: Results suggest RBC-TD may be a modifiable factor corresponding to clinical outcomes in LR-MDS, further supporting RBC-TI as a primary endpoint in clinical studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
1606
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia is a peer-reviewed monthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of lymphoma, myeloma and leukemia. Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of lymphoma, myeloma, leukemia and related disorders including macroglobulinemia, amyloidosis, and plasma-cell dyscrasias. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to lymphoma, myeloma and leukemia. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信