Nicolas Orbenes, Philipp Moog, Klaus Woertler, Jan Neumann, Hans-Guenther Machens, Haydar Kükrek
{"title":"拇指尺侧副韧带损伤的MRI诊断在临床手术决策中的准确性","authors":"Nicolas Orbenes, Philipp Moog, Klaus Woertler, Jan Neumann, Hans-Guenther Machens, Haydar Kükrek","doi":"10.1007/s00402-025-05923-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This retrospective study assessed whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confers a diagnostic or therapeutic advantage over clinical examination in managing thumb ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries and evaluated its accuracy in lesion characterization.</p><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>We reviewed 96 patients undergoing surgical repair over a ten-year period, 43 of whom had preoperative MRI and 53 who did not.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>While MRI exhibited high sensitivity (97%) and specificity (80%) for detecting UCL pathology, its accuracy for differentiating lesion subtypes was only moderate (72–84%). No appreciable difference was noted between MRI and non-MRI cohorts in the proportion of indication-appropriate (57% vs. 45%) or surgeries potentially amenable to conservative treatment (43% vs. 55%).</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Thus, MRI did not influence the indication for surgery beyond what was determined by a meticulous physical examination. A thorough clinical assessment remains the mainstay, reserving MRI for diagnostically challenging scenarios or when detailed anatomical visualization is necessary.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00402-025-05923-8.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The accuracy of MRI diagnosis of thumb ulnar collateral ligament injuries over physical examination in clinical decision-making for surgery\",\"authors\":\"Nicolas Orbenes, Philipp Moog, Klaus Woertler, Jan Neumann, Hans-Guenther Machens, Haydar Kükrek\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00402-025-05923-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This retrospective study assessed whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confers a diagnostic or therapeutic advantage over clinical examination in managing thumb ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries and evaluated its accuracy in lesion characterization.</p><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>We reviewed 96 patients undergoing surgical repair over a ten-year period, 43 of whom had preoperative MRI and 53 who did not.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>While MRI exhibited high sensitivity (97%) and specificity (80%) for detecting UCL pathology, its accuracy for differentiating lesion subtypes was only moderate (72–84%). No appreciable difference was noted between MRI and non-MRI cohorts in the proportion of indication-appropriate (57% vs. 45%) or surgeries potentially amenable to conservative treatment (43% vs. 55%).</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Thus, MRI did not influence the indication for surgery beyond what was determined by a meticulous physical examination. A thorough clinical assessment remains the mainstay, reserving MRI for diagnostically challenging scenarios or when detailed anatomical visualization is necessary.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery\",\"volume\":\"145 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00402-025-05923-8.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-025-05923-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-025-05923-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The accuracy of MRI diagnosis of thumb ulnar collateral ligament injuries over physical examination in clinical decision-making for surgery
Purpose
This retrospective study assessed whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confers a diagnostic or therapeutic advantage over clinical examination in managing thumb ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries and evaluated its accuracy in lesion characterization.
Materials and methods
We reviewed 96 patients undergoing surgical repair over a ten-year period, 43 of whom had preoperative MRI and 53 who did not.
Results
While MRI exhibited high sensitivity (97%) and specificity (80%) for detecting UCL pathology, its accuracy for differentiating lesion subtypes was only moderate (72–84%). No appreciable difference was noted between MRI and non-MRI cohorts in the proportion of indication-appropriate (57% vs. 45%) or surgeries potentially amenable to conservative treatment (43% vs. 55%).
Conclusions
Thus, MRI did not influence the indication for surgery beyond what was determined by a meticulous physical examination. A thorough clinical assessment remains the mainstay, reserving MRI for diagnostically challenging scenarios or when detailed anatomical visualization is necessary.
期刊介绍:
"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is a rich source of instruction and information for physicians in clinical practice and research in the extensive field of orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal publishes papers that deal with diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system from all fields and aspects of medicine. The journal is particularly interested in papers that satisfy the information needs of orthopaedic clinicians and practitioners. The journal places special emphasis on clinical relevance.
"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is the official journal of the German Speaking Arthroscopy Association (AGA).