拇指尺侧副韧带损伤的MRI诊断在临床手术决策中的准确性

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Nicolas Orbenes, Philipp Moog, Klaus Woertler, Jan Neumann, Hans-Guenther Machens, Haydar Kükrek
{"title":"拇指尺侧副韧带损伤的MRI诊断在临床手术决策中的准确性","authors":"Nicolas Orbenes,&nbsp;Philipp Moog,&nbsp;Klaus Woertler,&nbsp;Jan Neumann,&nbsp;Hans-Guenther Machens,&nbsp;Haydar Kükrek","doi":"10.1007/s00402-025-05923-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This retrospective study assessed whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confers a diagnostic or therapeutic advantage over clinical examination in managing thumb ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries and evaluated its accuracy in lesion characterization.</p><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>We reviewed 96 patients undergoing surgical repair over a ten-year period, 43 of whom had preoperative MRI and 53 who did not.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>While MRI exhibited high sensitivity (97%) and specificity (80%) for detecting UCL pathology, its accuracy for differentiating lesion subtypes was only moderate (72–84%). No appreciable difference was noted between MRI and non-MRI cohorts in the proportion of indication-appropriate (57% vs. 45%) or surgeries potentially amenable to conservative treatment (43% vs. 55%).</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Thus, MRI did not influence the indication for surgery beyond what was determined by a meticulous physical examination. A thorough clinical assessment remains the mainstay, reserving MRI for diagnostically challenging scenarios or when detailed anatomical visualization is necessary.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00402-025-05923-8.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The accuracy of MRI diagnosis of thumb ulnar collateral ligament injuries over physical examination in clinical decision-making for surgery\",\"authors\":\"Nicolas Orbenes,&nbsp;Philipp Moog,&nbsp;Klaus Woertler,&nbsp;Jan Neumann,&nbsp;Hans-Guenther Machens,&nbsp;Haydar Kükrek\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00402-025-05923-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This retrospective study assessed whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confers a diagnostic or therapeutic advantage over clinical examination in managing thumb ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries and evaluated its accuracy in lesion characterization.</p><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>We reviewed 96 patients undergoing surgical repair over a ten-year period, 43 of whom had preoperative MRI and 53 who did not.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>While MRI exhibited high sensitivity (97%) and specificity (80%) for detecting UCL pathology, its accuracy for differentiating lesion subtypes was only moderate (72–84%). No appreciable difference was noted between MRI and non-MRI cohorts in the proportion of indication-appropriate (57% vs. 45%) or surgeries potentially amenable to conservative treatment (43% vs. 55%).</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Thus, MRI did not influence the indication for surgery beyond what was determined by a meticulous physical examination. A thorough clinical assessment remains the mainstay, reserving MRI for diagnostically challenging scenarios or when detailed anatomical visualization is necessary.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery\",\"volume\":\"145 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00402-025-05923-8.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-025-05923-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-025-05923-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本回顾性研究评估磁共振成像(MRI)在治疗拇指尺侧副韧带(UCL)损伤方面是否比临床检查更具诊断或治疗优势,并评估其在病变表征方面的准确性。材料和方法我们回顾了96例十年来接受手术修复的患者,其中43例术前MRI检查,53例未做MRI检查。结果MRI对UCL病理诊断具有较高的敏感性(97%)和特异性(80%),但对病变亚型鉴别的准确性仅为中等水平(72-84%)。MRI组和非MRI组在适合适应症(57%对45%)或可能适合保守治疗的手术比例(43%对55%)方面没有明显差异。因此,MRI不影响手术指征,除非仔细的体格检查确定。彻底的临床评估仍然是主流,保留MRI诊断具有挑战性的情况或当详细的解剖可视化是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The accuracy of MRI diagnosis of thumb ulnar collateral ligament injuries over physical examination in clinical decision-making for surgery

Purpose

This retrospective study assessed whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confers a diagnostic or therapeutic advantage over clinical examination in managing thumb ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries and evaluated its accuracy in lesion characterization.

Materials and methods

We reviewed 96 patients undergoing surgical repair over a ten-year period, 43 of whom had preoperative MRI and 53 who did not.

Results

While MRI exhibited high sensitivity (97%) and specificity (80%) for detecting UCL pathology, its accuracy for differentiating lesion subtypes was only moderate (72–84%). No appreciable difference was noted between MRI and non-MRI cohorts in the proportion of indication-appropriate (57% vs. 45%) or surgeries potentially amenable to conservative treatment (43% vs. 55%).

Conclusions

Thus, MRI did not influence the indication for surgery beyond what was determined by a meticulous physical examination. A thorough clinical assessment remains the mainstay, reserving MRI for diagnostically challenging scenarios or when detailed anatomical visualization is necessary.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
424
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is a rich source of instruction and information for physicians in clinical practice and research in the extensive field of orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal publishes papers that deal with diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system from all fields and aspects of medicine. The journal is particularly interested in papers that satisfy the information needs of orthopaedic clinicians and practitioners. The journal places special emphasis on clinical relevance. "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is the official journal of the German Speaking Arthroscopy Association (AGA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信