{"title":"城市边界制图的综合社会生态方法","authors":"Chenmeng Guo , Guopan Xie , Wenjuan Yu , Weiqi Zhou , Steward T.A. Pickett","doi":"10.1016/j.apgeog.2025.103665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Clear definition and accurate delineation of urban boundaries are the prerequisite for urban-rural studies. However, urban boundaries have been typically mapped based either on biophysical or socio-economical properties, resulting in barriers in conducting integrative social-ecological studies. Here, we developed a new approach that integrates the biophysical and socio-economical perspectives for urban boundaries mapping, and tested the approach in mainland of China. First, we divided the study area into 1 × 1 km grids, some of which were classified into urban and rural based on Points of Interest (POIs) and official urban-rural classification. The classified grids were then served as training samples to determine thresholds of impervious surface percentage (ISP) for further urban-rural separation. Combined threshold of ISP (biophysical properties) with connectivity to administrative urban centers (socio-economical properties), the unclassified grids were assigned as either urban or rural. Finally, all urban grids were merged to create China's urban boundary (CUB). The integrative approach improved the accuracy of town mapping and village mapping by 15 % and 17 % respectively, compared with existing urban boundary products. Our approach is thus capable to improve mapping accuracy and provide urban boundary for social-ecological studies in urban-rural areas.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48396,"journal":{"name":"Applied Geography","volume":"180 ","pages":"Article 103665"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An integrative social-ecological approach for urban boundary mapping\",\"authors\":\"Chenmeng Guo , Guopan Xie , Wenjuan Yu , Weiqi Zhou , Steward T.A. Pickett\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apgeog.2025.103665\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Clear definition and accurate delineation of urban boundaries are the prerequisite for urban-rural studies. However, urban boundaries have been typically mapped based either on biophysical or socio-economical properties, resulting in barriers in conducting integrative social-ecological studies. Here, we developed a new approach that integrates the biophysical and socio-economical perspectives for urban boundaries mapping, and tested the approach in mainland of China. First, we divided the study area into 1 × 1 km grids, some of which were classified into urban and rural based on Points of Interest (POIs) and official urban-rural classification. The classified grids were then served as training samples to determine thresholds of impervious surface percentage (ISP) for further urban-rural separation. Combined threshold of ISP (biophysical properties) with connectivity to administrative urban centers (socio-economical properties), the unclassified grids were assigned as either urban or rural. Finally, all urban grids were merged to create China's urban boundary (CUB). The integrative approach improved the accuracy of town mapping and village mapping by 15 % and 17 % respectively, compared with existing urban boundary products. Our approach is thus capable to improve mapping accuracy and provide urban boundary for social-ecological studies in urban-rural areas.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Geography\",\"volume\":\"180 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103665\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Geography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143622825001602\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Geography","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143622825001602","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
An integrative social-ecological approach for urban boundary mapping
Clear definition and accurate delineation of urban boundaries are the prerequisite for urban-rural studies. However, urban boundaries have been typically mapped based either on biophysical or socio-economical properties, resulting in barriers in conducting integrative social-ecological studies. Here, we developed a new approach that integrates the biophysical and socio-economical perspectives for urban boundaries mapping, and tested the approach in mainland of China. First, we divided the study area into 1 × 1 km grids, some of which were classified into urban and rural based on Points of Interest (POIs) and official urban-rural classification. The classified grids were then served as training samples to determine thresholds of impervious surface percentage (ISP) for further urban-rural separation. Combined threshold of ISP (biophysical properties) with connectivity to administrative urban centers (socio-economical properties), the unclassified grids were assigned as either urban or rural. Finally, all urban grids were merged to create China's urban boundary (CUB). The integrative approach improved the accuracy of town mapping and village mapping by 15 % and 17 % respectively, compared with existing urban boundary products. Our approach is thus capable to improve mapping accuracy and provide urban boundary for social-ecological studies in urban-rural areas.
期刊介绍:
Applied Geography is a journal devoted to the publication of research which utilizes geographic approaches (human, physical, nature-society and GIScience) to resolve human problems that have a spatial dimension. These problems may be related to the assessment, management and allocation of the world physical and/or human resources. The underlying rationale of the journal is that only through a clear understanding of the relevant societal, physical, and coupled natural-humans systems can we resolve such problems. Papers are invited on any theme involving the application of geographical theory and methodology in the resolution of human problems.