Magali Boers, Aude Rochereau, Louisa Stuwe, Lorena San Miguel, Jochen Klucken, Fruzsina Mezei, Jérôme Fabiano, Sandrine Boulet, Aymeric Perchant, Rosanna Tarricone, Francesco Petracca, Barbara Hoefgen, Corinne Collignon, Sarah Zohar
{"title":"欧盟环境下评估数字医疗设备的分类网格和证据矩阵","authors":"Magali Boers, Aude Rochereau, Louisa Stuwe, Lorena San Miguel, Jochen Klucken, Fruzsina Mezei, Jérôme Fabiano, Sandrine Boulet, Aymeric Perchant, Rosanna Tarricone, Francesco Petracca, Barbara Hoefgen, Corinne Collignon, Sarah Zohar","doi":"10.1038/s41746-025-01697-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A uniform and harmonised taxonomy of Digital Medical Devices (DMDs) and their evidence-based evaluation are essential to ensure their integration into healthcare systems across the European Union (EU). As part of the Taskforce for Harmonised Evaluation of DMDs, a Common European Classification Grid for DMDs (CEUGrid-DMD) associated with an Evidence Matrix is developed. These tools are based on the mapping of existing frameworks, a survey of Health Technology Assessment (HTA) practices, consensus meetings and workshop. The survey was sent to 32 national representatives of HTA bodies from 18 EU countries. Ten HTA bodies from nine countries completed the survey while others could not, in the absence of the effective implementation of a DMD evaluation framework. This work results in the CEUGrid-DMD including four taxonomy categories, associated with an evidence-based matrix. Overall, this first version should help to converge scientific assessments of DMDs in the context of HTA Regulations across the EU.</p>","PeriodicalId":19349,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Digital Medicine","volume":"485 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classification grid and evidence matrix for evaluating digital medical devices under the European union landscape\",\"authors\":\"Magali Boers, Aude Rochereau, Louisa Stuwe, Lorena San Miguel, Jochen Klucken, Fruzsina Mezei, Jérôme Fabiano, Sandrine Boulet, Aymeric Perchant, Rosanna Tarricone, Francesco Petracca, Barbara Hoefgen, Corinne Collignon, Sarah Zohar\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41746-025-01697-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A uniform and harmonised taxonomy of Digital Medical Devices (DMDs) and their evidence-based evaluation are essential to ensure their integration into healthcare systems across the European Union (EU). As part of the Taskforce for Harmonised Evaluation of DMDs, a Common European Classification Grid for DMDs (CEUGrid-DMD) associated with an Evidence Matrix is developed. These tools are based on the mapping of existing frameworks, a survey of Health Technology Assessment (HTA) practices, consensus meetings and workshop. The survey was sent to 32 national representatives of HTA bodies from 18 EU countries. Ten HTA bodies from nine countries completed the survey while others could not, in the absence of the effective implementation of a DMD evaluation framework. This work results in the CEUGrid-DMD including four taxonomy categories, associated with an evidence-based matrix. Overall, this first version should help to converge scientific assessments of DMDs in the context of HTA Regulations across the EU.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NPJ Digital Medicine\",\"volume\":\"485 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NPJ Digital Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01697-w\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Digital Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01697-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Classification grid and evidence matrix for evaluating digital medical devices under the European union landscape
A uniform and harmonised taxonomy of Digital Medical Devices (DMDs) and their evidence-based evaluation are essential to ensure their integration into healthcare systems across the European Union (EU). As part of the Taskforce for Harmonised Evaluation of DMDs, a Common European Classification Grid for DMDs (CEUGrid-DMD) associated with an Evidence Matrix is developed. These tools are based on the mapping of existing frameworks, a survey of Health Technology Assessment (HTA) practices, consensus meetings and workshop. The survey was sent to 32 national representatives of HTA bodies from 18 EU countries. Ten HTA bodies from nine countries completed the survey while others could not, in the absence of the effective implementation of a DMD evaluation framework. This work results in the CEUGrid-DMD including four taxonomy categories, associated with an evidence-based matrix. Overall, this first version should help to converge scientific assessments of DMDs in the context of HTA Regulations across the EU.
期刊介绍:
npj Digital Medicine is an online open-access journal that focuses on publishing peer-reviewed research in the field of digital medicine. The journal covers various aspects of digital medicine, including the application and implementation of digital and mobile technologies in clinical settings, virtual healthcare, and the use of artificial intelligence and informatics.
The primary goal of the journal is to support innovation and the advancement of healthcare through the integration of new digital and mobile technologies. When determining if a manuscript is suitable for publication, the journal considers four important criteria: novelty, clinical relevance, scientific rigor, and digital innovation.