{"title":"初级保健就诊类型与COVID-19疫苗犹豫:一项回顾性队列研究","authors":"Orit Cohen Castel, Cheryl Zlotnick","doi":"10.3399/bjgp25X742341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic changed the nature of primary care visits, from face-to-face to an increasing prevalence of online or telephone visits, but little is known about the association between types of primary care visits and vaccine hesitancy.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine the association between primary care visit type and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>A retrospective cohort study for the period of 9.2019 to 9.2022 was conducted using randomly selected medical records from a large HMO on adults with at least one visit with the primary care physician between 1.12.2019 to 30.11.2020 (the exposure period).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Logistic regression models were used to test the association between primary care visit type and full COVID-19 vaccination status after adjusting for socio-demographic, clinical, and health behaviour characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the final cohort (<i>n</i> = 173 779), 126 204 (72.6%) were fully vaccinated. Logistic regression model findings indicated that male adults who used online asynchronous visits, lived in a city, had hypertension and/or diabetes, and received seasonal influenza vaccine were more likely to obtain full vaccination. Less likely to obtain full vaccination were adults who used telephone visits, had high numbers of face-to-face visits, had low socioeconomic status and were ≥60 years old (<i>P</i><0.001 for all).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Primary care visit type during the COVID-19 pre-vaccination period predicts vaccine hesitancy. Physicians' awareness of patients who avoid using newer forms of technology-based visits, may allow the provision of targeted interventions to improve health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":520790,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners","volume":"75 suppl 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Types of primary care visits and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: a retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Orit Cohen Castel, Cheryl Zlotnick\",\"doi\":\"10.3399/bjgp25X742341\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic changed the nature of primary care visits, from face-to-face to an increasing prevalence of online or telephone visits, but little is known about the association between types of primary care visits and vaccine hesitancy.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine the association between primary care visit type and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>A retrospective cohort study for the period of 9.2019 to 9.2022 was conducted using randomly selected medical records from a large HMO on adults with at least one visit with the primary care physician between 1.12.2019 to 30.11.2020 (the exposure period).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Logistic regression models were used to test the association between primary care visit type and full COVID-19 vaccination status after adjusting for socio-demographic, clinical, and health behaviour characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the final cohort (<i>n</i> = 173 779), 126 204 (72.6%) were fully vaccinated. Logistic regression model findings indicated that male adults who used online asynchronous visits, lived in a city, had hypertension and/or diabetes, and received seasonal influenza vaccine were more likely to obtain full vaccination. Less likely to obtain full vaccination were adults who used telephone visits, had high numbers of face-to-face visits, had low socioeconomic status and were ≥60 years old (<i>P</i><0.001 for all).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Primary care visit type during the COVID-19 pre-vaccination period predicts vaccine hesitancy. Physicians' awareness of patients who avoid using newer forms of technology-based visits, may allow the provision of targeted interventions to improve health outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520790,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners\",\"volume\":\"75 suppl 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp25X742341\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp25X742341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Types of primary care visits and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: a retrospective cohort study.
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic changed the nature of primary care visits, from face-to-face to an increasing prevalence of online or telephone visits, but little is known about the association between types of primary care visits and vaccine hesitancy.
Aim: To examine the association between primary care visit type and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy.
Design and setting: A retrospective cohort study for the period of 9.2019 to 9.2022 was conducted using randomly selected medical records from a large HMO on adults with at least one visit with the primary care physician between 1.12.2019 to 30.11.2020 (the exposure period).
Method: Logistic regression models were used to test the association between primary care visit type and full COVID-19 vaccination status after adjusting for socio-demographic, clinical, and health behaviour characteristics.
Results: Of the final cohort (n = 173 779), 126 204 (72.6%) were fully vaccinated. Logistic regression model findings indicated that male adults who used online asynchronous visits, lived in a city, had hypertension and/or diabetes, and received seasonal influenza vaccine were more likely to obtain full vaccination. Less likely to obtain full vaccination were adults who used telephone visits, had high numbers of face-to-face visits, had low socioeconomic status and were ≥60 years old (P<0.001 for all).
Conclusion: Primary care visit type during the COVID-19 pre-vaccination period predicts vaccine hesitancy. Physicians' awareness of patients who avoid using newer forms of technology-based visits, may allow the provision of targeted interventions to improve health outcomes.