分布和质量的私人GP实践在英格兰:横断面分析。

IF 5.2
Joseph Hutchinson, Michael Anderson, Harriet Bullen, Zara Kurdo, Matt Sutton
{"title":"分布和质量的私人GP实践在英格兰:横断面分析。","authors":"Joseph Hutchinson, Michael Anderson, Harriet Bullen, Zara Kurdo, Matt Sutton","doi":"10.3399/bjgp25X741753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Public surveys have indicated increasing demand for private GP services amidst difficulty in accessing NHS GP services. However, little is known regarding the location and quality of private GP practices.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine the distribution of private GP practices in England, their relationship with NHS GP practices and comparative quality measures.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We identified all private GP practices registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) in England, as of April 2024. We used negative binomial regression to analyse the number of private GP practices within 10 km of NHS GP practices and patient reported access and continuity as well as the market environment and practice characteristics. We used ordinal logistic regression to compare quality ratings between all private and NHS GP practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Characteristics associated with the count of nearby private GP practices included average population income (IRR 1.07, 95% CI = 1.06 to 1.08), patient satisfaction with NHS appointment wait (IRR 1.10, 95% CI = 1.07 to 1.13) and continuity (IRR 0.96, 95% CI= 0.94 to 0.98), proportion of community from ethnic minority (IRR 1.11, 95% CI = 1.08 to 1.14), NHS GPs per 10 000 patients (IRR 1.02, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.04), community deprivation (IRR 0.90, 95% CI = 0.88 to 0.92) and urban location (IRR 2.15, 95% CI = 1.71 to 2.69). Quality ratings were similar between private and NHS GPs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Private GP services are more common in more affluent areas with greater supply of and access to NHS GPs. This may exacerbate inequalities in access to GP services between richer and poorer areas, when considering access to both NHS and private GP services.</p>","PeriodicalId":520790,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners","volume":"75 suppl 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distribution and quality of private GP practices in England: a cross-sectional analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Hutchinson, Michael Anderson, Harriet Bullen, Zara Kurdo, Matt Sutton\",\"doi\":\"10.3399/bjgp25X741753\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Public surveys have indicated increasing demand for private GP services amidst difficulty in accessing NHS GP services. However, little is known regarding the location and quality of private GP practices.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine the distribution of private GP practices in England, their relationship with NHS GP practices and comparative quality measures.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We identified all private GP practices registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) in England, as of April 2024. We used negative binomial regression to analyse the number of private GP practices within 10 km of NHS GP practices and patient reported access and continuity as well as the market environment and practice characteristics. We used ordinal logistic regression to compare quality ratings between all private and NHS GP practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Characteristics associated with the count of nearby private GP practices included average population income (IRR 1.07, 95% CI = 1.06 to 1.08), patient satisfaction with NHS appointment wait (IRR 1.10, 95% CI = 1.07 to 1.13) and continuity (IRR 0.96, 95% CI= 0.94 to 0.98), proportion of community from ethnic minority (IRR 1.11, 95% CI = 1.08 to 1.14), NHS GPs per 10 000 patients (IRR 1.02, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.04), community deprivation (IRR 0.90, 95% CI = 0.88 to 0.92) and urban location (IRR 2.15, 95% CI = 1.71 to 2.69). Quality ratings were similar between private and NHS GPs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Private GP services are more common in more affluent areas with greater supply of and access to NHS GPs. This may exacerbate inequalities in access to GP services between richer and poorer areas, when considering access to both NHS and private GP services.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520790,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners\",\"volume\":\"75 suppl 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp25X741753\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp25X741753","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:公众调查表明,在难以获得NHS全科医生服务的情况下,对私人全科医生服务的需求不断增加。然而,关于私人全科医生的位置和质量知之甚少。目的:检查分布的私人GP实践在英格兰,他们的关系与NHS GP实践和比较质量措施。方法:我们确定了截至2024年4月在英国医疗质量委员会(CQC)注册的所有私人全科医生。我们使用负二项回归来分析NHS GP实践10公里内的私人GP实践的数量和患者报告的访问和连续性以及市场环境和实践特征。我们使用有序逻辑回归来比较所有私人和NHS全科医生实践的质量评级。结果:与附近私人全科医生数量相关的特征包括平均人口收入(IRR 1.07, 95% CI= 1.06 ~ 1.08)、患者对NHS预约等待的满意度(IRR 1.10, 95% CI= 1.07 ~ 1.13)和连续性(IRR 0.96, 95% CI= 0.94 ~ 0.98)、少数民族社区比例(IRR 1.11, 95% CI= 1.08 ~ 1.14)、每万名患者的NHS全科医生数量(IRR 1.02, 95% CI= 1.01 ~ 1.04)、社区剥夺(IRR 0.90、95% CI = 0.88 ~ 0.92)和城市位置(IRR 2.15, 95% CI = 1.71 ~ 2.69)。私人和NHS全科医生的质量评级相似。结论:私人全科医生服务在更富裕的地区更常见,NHS全科医生的供应和获取更多。这可能会加剧贫富地区在获得全科医生服务方面的不平等,当考虑到获得NHS和私人全科医生服务时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Distribution and quality of private GP practices in England: a cross-sectional analysis.

Background: Public surveys have indicated increasing demand for private GP services amidst difficulty in accessing NHS GP services. However, little is known regarding the location and quality of private GP practices.

Aim: To examine the distribution of private GP practices in England, their relationship with NHS GP practices and comparative quality measures.

Method: We identified all private GP practices registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) in England, as of April 2024. We used negative binomial regression to analyse the number of private GP practices within 10 km of NHS GP practices and patient reported access and continuity as well as the market environment and practice characteristics. We used ordinal logistic regression to compare quality ratings between all private and NHS GP practices.

Results: Characteristics associated with the count of nearby private GP practices included average population income (IRR 1.07, 95% CI = 1.06 to 1.08), patient satisfaction with NHS appointment wait (IRR 1.10, 95% CI = 1.07 to 1.13) and continuity (IRR 0.96, 95% CI= 0.94 to 0.98), proportion of community from ethnic minority (IRR 1.11, 95% CI = 1.08 to 1.14), NHS GPs per 10 000 patients (IRR 1.02, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.04), community deprivation (IRR 0.90, 95% CI = 0.88 to 0.92) and urban location (IRR 2.15, 95% CI = 1.71 to 2.69). Quality ratings were similar between private and NHS GPs.

Conclusion: Private GP services are more common in more affluent areas with greater supply of and access to NHS GPs. This may exacerbate inequalities in access to GP services between richer and poorer areas, when considering access to both NHS and private GP services.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信