Shrirajh Satheakeerthy , Brandon Stretton , James Tsimiklis , Andrew EC. Booth , Sarah Howson , Shaun Evans , Christina Guo , Joshua Kovoor , Aashray Gupta , Christina Gao , Weng Onn Chan , Tim French , Amelia Demopoulos , Alyssa Pradhan , Samuel Gluck , Toby Gilbert , Matthew Blake Roberts , Camille Kotton , Stephen Bacchi
{"title":"零射击大语言模型在手术部位感染审计中的应用。","authors":"Shrirajh Satheakeerthy , Brandon Stretton , James Tsimiklis , Andrew EC. Booth , Sarah Howson , Shaun Evans , Christina Guo , Joshua Kovoor , Aashray Gupta , Christina Gao , Weng Onn Chan , Tim French , Amelia Demopoulos , Alyssa Pradhan , Samuel Gluck , Toby Gilbert , Matthew Blake Roberts , Camille Kotton , Stephen Bacchi","doi":"10.1016/j.idh.2025.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Artificial intelligence, in particular large language models (LLM), may be able to assist with monitoring for surgical site infections (SSI).</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>This retrospective study involved the application of the Llama 3.0 70-billion parameter model to the identification of SSI in a group of all SSI in two metropolitan hospitals from a 4-month period. Randomly selected control patients were chosen as comparators. Clinical inpatient and outpatient progress notes were provided to the LLM individually and classified as indicating an SSI or not. These classifications were then analysed to determine binary performance characteristics and to determine the timing of positive case classification.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There was a total of 28 cases in the study, 14 in the case (SSI) group and 14 in the control group. The operations involved in the SSI cases were caesarean section (12/14, 85.7 %) and arthroplasty (2/14, 14.2 %). The LLM had an overall accuracy at the patient-level of 26/28 (93 %). There was a sensitivity of 100 % and specificity of 86%. At the note-level, for the first note flagged by the LLM for each case, 13/14 (92.3 %) were on the same day as, or before, the date noted as the onset of infection as identified by infection control clinicians.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The use of LLM for the screening of medical notes for SSI is feasible. Further studies may seek to evaluate the outcomes of LLM when deployed as part of a clinical workflow.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45006,"journal":{"name":"Infection Disease & Health","volume":"30 4","pages":"Pages 337-342"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Zero-shot large language model application for surgical site infection auditing\",\"authors\":\"Shrirajh Satheakeerthy , Brandon Stretton , James Tsimiklis , Andrew EC. Booth , Sarah Howson , Shaun Evans , Christina Guo , Joshua Kovoor , Aashray Gupta , Christina Gao , Weng Onn Chan , Tim French , Amelia Demopoulos , Alyssa Pradhan , Samuel Gluck , Toby Gilbert , Matthew Blake Roberts , Camille Kotton , Stephen Bacchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.idh.2025.05.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Artificial intelligence, in particular large language models (LLM), may be able to assist with monitoring for surgical site infections (SSI).</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>This retrospective study involved the application of the Llama 3.0 70-billion parameter model to the identification of SSI in a group of all SSI in two metropolitan hospitals from a 4-month period. Randomly selected control patients were chosen as comparators. Clinical inpatient and outpatient progress notes were provided to the LLM individually and classified as indicating an SSI or not. These classifications were then analysed to determine binary performance characteristics and to determine the timing of positive case classification.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There was a total of 28 cases in the study, 14 in the case (SSI) group and 14 in the control group. The operations involved in the SSI cases were caesarean section (12/14, 85.7 %) and arthroplasty (2/14, 14.2 %). The LLM had an overall accuracy at the patient-level of 26/28 (93 %). There was a sensitivity of 100 % and specificity of 86%. At the note-level, for the first note flagged by the LLM for each case, 13/14 (92.3 %) were on the same day as, or before, the date noted as the onset of infection as identified by infection control clinicians.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The use of LLM for the screening of medical notes for SSI is feasible. Further studies may seek to evaluate the outcomes of LLM when deployed as part of a clinical workflow.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infection Disease & Health\",\"volume\":\"30 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 337-342\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infection Disease & Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468045125000306\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Disease & Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468045125000306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Zero-shot large language model application for surgical site infection auditing
Introduction
Artificial intelligence, in particular large language models (LLM), may be able to assist with monitoring for surgical site infections (SSI).
Method
This retrospective study involved the application of the Llama 3.0 70-billion parameter model to the identification of SSI in a group of all SSI in two metropolitan hospitals from a 4-month period. Randomly selected control patients were chosen as comparators. Clinical inpatient and outpatient progress notes were provided to the LLM individually and classified as indicating an SSI or not. These classifications were then analysed to determine binary performance characteristics and to determine the timing of positive case classification.
Results
There was a total of 28 cases in the study, 14 in the case (SSI) group and 14 in the control group. The operations involved in the SSI cases were caesarean section (12/14, 85.7 %) and arthroplasty (2/14, 14.2 %). The LLM had an overall accuracy at the patient-level of 26/28 (93 %). There was a sensitivity of 100 % and specificity of 86%. At the note-level, for the first note flagged by the LLM for each case, 13/14 (92.3 %) were on the same day as, or before, the date noted as the onset of infection as identified by infection control clinicians.
Conclusions
The use of LLM for the screening of medical notes for SSI is feasible. Further studies may seek to evaluate the outcomes of LLM when deployed as part of a clinical workflow.
期刊介绍:
The journal aims to be a platform for the publication and dissemination of knowledge in the area of infection and disease causing infection in humans. The journal is quarterly and publishes research, reviews, concise communications, commentary and other articles concerned with infection and disease affecting the health of an individual, organisation or population. The original and important articles in the journal investigate, report or discuss infection prevention and control; clinical, social, epidemiological or public health aspects of infectious disease; policy and planning for the control of infections; zoonoses; and vaccination related to disease in human health. Infection, Disease & Health provides a platform for the publication and dissemination of original knowledge at the nexus of the areas infection, Disease and health in a One Health context. One Health recognizes that the health of people is connected to the health of animals and the environment. One Health encourages and advances the collaborative efforts of multiple disciplines-working locally, nationally, and globally-to achieve the best health for people, animals, and our environment. This approach is fundamental because 6 out of every 10 infectious diseases in humans are zoonotic, or spread from animals. We would be expected to report or discuss infection prevention and control; clinical, social, epidemiological or public health aspects of infectious disease; policy and planning for the control of infections; zoonosis; and vaccination related to disease in human health. The Journal seeks to bring together knowledge from all specialties involved in infection research and clinical practice, and present the best work in this ever-changing field. The audience of the journal includes researchers, clinicians, health workers and public policy professionals concerned with infection, disease and health.