糖尿病酮症酸中毒的研究重点:证据和缺口定位综述。

Q1 Medicine
Nicolas Sieben, Mahesh Ramanan
{"title":"糖尿病酮症酸中毒的研究重点:证据和缺口定位综述。","authors":"Nicolas Sieben, Mahesh Ramanan","doi":"10.3390/medsci13020053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is a common acute complication of diabetes with treatment consisting of reversal of cause, insulin administration, fluid resuscitation and electrolyte repletion. Yet, many aspects of DKA management are currently based on low-quality evidence or physiological rationale. This evidence and gap map review presents an overview of the current body of literature and identifies evidence gaps in relation to therapeutic interventions for DKA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Interventions and outcomes relevant to DKA were identified and iteratively developed to produce a coding model for the proposed evidence and gap map. PubMed was searched with Me SH terms relevant to the identified interventions and outcomes. Studies identified were screened and assigned interventions and outcomes. Interventional research was uploaded to EPPI-Reviewer and EPPI-Mapper to produce the evidence and gap map.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 1131 studies, of which 18 were non-human and 345 were duplicates. A total of 768 unique studies were screened, and 118 were identified as interventions (52 pediatric and 66 adult studies). A total of 26 high-quality studies, 88 medium-quality studies and 4 low-quality studies were identified. These 118 studies were coded into the proposed DKA evidence and gap map. The intervention domains were fluid therapy, insulin therapy, electrolyte replacement, adjunct therapies and admission type. The outcome domains were DKA resolution, insulin duration, length of stay, morbidity and mortality, complications, and biochemical parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fluid type and insulin infusion administration were prominent in the current literature. These studies frequently used DKA resolution and complications associated with DKA such as electrolyte disturbances and cerebral edema as the primary outcomes. Substantial gaps were identified with scant evidence to guide prophylactic electrolyte administration, enteral intake and adjunctive therapy (thiamine, bicarbonate). Even for well-investigated interventions such as fluids and insulin, substantial gaps existed, particularly for patient-centered and healthcare service outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":74152,"journal":{"name":"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"13 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12101225/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research Priorities for Diabetic Ketoacidosis: An Evidence and Gap Mapping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Nicolas Sieben, Mahesh Ramanan\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/medsci13020053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is a common acute complication of diabetes with treatment consisting of reversal of cause, insulin administration, fluid resuscitation and electrolyte repletion. Yet, many aspects of DKA management are currently based on low-quality evidence or physiological rationale. This evidence and gap map review presents an overview of the current body of literature and identifies evidence gaps in relation to therapeutic interventions for DKA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Interventions and outcomes relevant to DKA were identified and iteratively developed to produce a coding model for the proposed evidence and gap map. PubMed was searched with Me SH terms relevant to the identified interventions and outcomes. Studies identified were screened and assigned interventions and outcomes. Interventional research was uploaded to EPPI-Reviewer and EPPI-Mapper to produce the evidence and gap map.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 1131 studies, of which 18 were non-human and 345 were duplicates. A total of 768 unique studies were screened, and 118 were identified as interventions (52 pediatric and 66 adult studies). A total of 26 high-quality studies, 88 medium-quality studies and 4 low-quality studies were identified. These 118 studies were coded into the proposed DKA evidence and gap map. The intervention domains were fluid therapy, insulin therapy, electrolyte replacement, adjunct therapies and admission type. The outcome domains were DKA resolution, insulin duration, length of stay, morbidity and mortality, complications, and biochemical parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fluid type and insulin infusion administration were prominent in the current literature. These studies frequently used DKA resolution and complications associated with DKA such as electrolyte disturbances and cerebral edema as the primary outcomes. Substantial gaps were identified with scant evidence to guide prophylactic electrolyte administration, enteral intake and adjunctive therapy (thiamine, bicarbonate). Even for well-investigated interventions such as fluids and insulin, substantial gaps existed, particularly for patient-centered and healthcare service outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"volume\":\"13 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12101225/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci13020053\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci13020053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)是糖尿病常见的急性并发症,治疗包括病因逆转、胰岛素治疗、液体复苏和电解质补充。然而,DKA管理的许多方面目前都是基于低质量的证据或生理原理。这一证据和缺口图回顾概述了当前的文献,并确定了与DKA治疗干预有关的证据缺口。方法:确定并迭代开发与DKA相关的干预措施和结果,以生成拟议证据和差距图的编码模型。PubMed检索了与确定的干预措施和结果相关的Me SH术语。对确定的研究进行筛选并分配干预措施和结果。介入研究上传到EPPI-Reviewer和EPPI-Mapper,生成证据和差距图。结果:检索确定了1131项研究,其中18项是非人类研究,345项是重复研究。总共筛选了768项独特的研究,其中118项被确定为干预措施(52项儿科研究和66项成人研究)。共纳入26项高质量研究、88项中等质量研究和4项低质量研究。这118项研究被编码到拟议的DKA证据和差距图中。干预范围包括液体疗法、胰岛素疗法、电解质替代疗法、辅助疗法和入院方式。结果域为DKA缓解、胰岛素持续时间、住院时间、发病率和死亡率、并发症和生化参数。结论:目前文献中以液体类型和胰岛素输注给药为主。这些研究经常使用DKA缓解和与DKA相关的并发症,如电解质紊乱和脑水肿作为主要结局。在缺乏证据的情况下,发现了实质性的差距,以指导预防性电解质给药、肠内摄入和辅助治疗(硫胺素、碳酸氢盐)。即使对于液体和胰岛素等经过充分调查的干预措施,也存在巨大差距,特别是在以患者为中心和医疗保健服务成果方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Research Priorities for Diabetic Ketoacidosis: An Evidence and Gap Mapping Review.

Background/objectives: Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is a common acute complication of diabetes with treatment consisting of reversal of cause, insulin administration, fluid resuscitation and electrolyte repletion. Yet, many aspects of DKA management are currently based on low-quality evidence or physiological rationale. This evidence and gap map review presents an overview of the current body of literature and identifies evidence gaps in relation to therapeutic interventions for DKA.

Methods: Interventions and outcomes relevant to DKA were identified and iteratively developed to produce a coding model for the proposed evidence and gap map. PubMed was searched with Me SH terms relevant to the identified interventions and outcomes. Studies identified were screened and assigned interventions and outcomes. Interventional research was uploaded to EPPI-Reviewer and EPPI-Mapper to produce the evidence and gap map.

Results: The search identified 1131 studies, of which 18 were non-human and 345 were duplicates. A total of 768 unique studies were screened, and 118 were identified as interventions (52 pediatric and 66 adult studies). A total of 26 high-quality studies, 88 medium-quality studies and 4 low-quality studies were identified. These 118 studies were coded into the proposed DKA evidence and gap map. The intervention domains were fluid therapy, insulin therapy, electrolyte replacement, adjunct therapies and admission type. The outcome domains were DKA resolution, insulin duration, length of stay, morbidity and mortality, complications, and biochemical parameters.

Conclusions: Fluid type and insulin infusion administration were prominent in the current literature. These studies frequently used DKA resolution and complications associated with DKA such as electrolyte disturbances and cerebral edema as the primary outcomes. Substantial gaps were identified with scant evidence to guide prophylactic electrolyte administration, enteral intake and adjunctive therapy (thiamine, bicarbonate). Even for well-investigated interventions such as fluids and insulin, substantial gaps existed, particularly for patient-centered and healthcare service outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信