量身定制的干预措施成功地维持了该地区的冲程循环等级。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Laura McCredie, Alesha Sayner, Joanne V Glinsky, Emily Harwood, Katharine Scrivener
{"title":"量身定制的干预措施成功地维持了该地区的冲程循环等级。","authors":"Laura McCredie, Alesha Sayner, Joanne V Glinsky, Emily Harwood, Katharine Scrivener","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2025.2508403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Guidelines recommend circuit classes to improve mobility after stroke. This study aimed to develop, deliver and evaluate an intervention to sustain a lower limb stroke circuit class in a regional setting in Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This implementation study was guided by the Knowledge to Action framework with four phases. Phase 1: review of current circuit class practice. Phase 2: evaluation of health professional barriers and facilitators. Phase 3: development and delivery of a tailored implementation intervention based on the needs of health professionals. Phase 4: evaluation of sustainability and class outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Phase 1: audit showed circuit classes had low attendance (<i>n</i> = 22/month). Phase 2: health professional participants (<i>n</i> = 21) identified key barriers and facilitators to delivering the circuit class, including a lack of training and confidence. Phase 3: the implementation intervention involved role modelling and training of health professionals conducting the class. Phase 4: average circuit class attendance increased and was maintained at follow-up (<i>n</i> = 32/month during intervention, <i>n</i> = 33/month post-intervention). Health professionals' confidence in others conducting the circuit class increased (43% pre-intervention to 92% post-intervention).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A tailored implementation intervention for health professionals in a regional community setting improved sustainability and increased confidence in conducting circuit classes for people with stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A tailored implementation intervention is successful in sustaining a stroke circuit class in a regional setting.\",\"authors\":\"Laura McCredie, Alesha Sayner, Joanne V Glinsky, Emily Harwood, Katharine Scrivener\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09638288.2025.2508403\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Guidelines recommend circuit classes to improve mobility after stroke. This study aimed to develop, deliver and evaluate an intervention to sustain a lower limb stroke circuit class in a regional setting in Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This implementation study was guided by the Knowledge to Action framework with four phases. Phase 1: review of current circuit class practice. Phase 2: evaluation of health professional barriers and facilitators. Phase 3: development and delivery of a tailored implementation intervention based on the needs of health professionals. Phase 4: evaluation of sustainability and class outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Phase 1: audit showed circuit classes had low attendance (<i>n</i> = 22/month). Phase 2: health professional participants (<i>n</i> = 21) identified key barriers and facilitators to delivering the circuit class, including a lack of training and confidence. Phase 3: the implementation intervention involved role modelling and training of health professionals conducting the class. Phase 4: average circuit class attendance increased and was maintained at follow-up (<i>n</i> = 32/month during intervention, <i>n</i> = 33/month post-intervention). Health professionals' confidence in others conducting the circuit class increased (43% pre-intervention to 92% post-intervention).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A tailored implementation intervention for health professionals in a regional community setting improved sustainability and increased confidence in conducting circuit classes for people with stroke.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2025.2508403\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2025.2508403","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:指南推荐循环课程来改善中风后的活动能力。本研究旨在开发,交付和评估干预措施,以维持在澳大利亚的一个区域设置下肢中风循环类。方法:本实施研究以“从知识到行动”框架为指导,分四个阶段进行。第一阶段:回顾当前的电路课实践。第二阶段:评估卫生专业障碍和促进因素。第3阶段:根据卫生专业人员的需要制定和实施有针对性的实施干预措施。第四阶段:评估可持续性和课堂成果。结果:第一阶段:审计显示电路课程出勤率低(n = 22/月)。第二阶段:保健专业参与者(n = 21)确定了提供巡回课程的主要障碍和促进因素,包括缺乏培训和信心。第3阶段:实施干预措施涉及为讲授课程的保健专业人员树立榜样和进行培训。第4阶段:电路课的平均出勤率增加,并在随访中保持(干预期间n = 32/月,干预后n = 33/月)。卫生专业人员对其他人进行巡回课程的信心增加(干预前为43%,干预后为92%)。结论:为区域社区环境中的卫生专业人员量身定制的实施干预措施提高了卒中患者巡回课程的可持续性,并增加了他们的信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A tailored implementation intervention is successful in sustaining a stroke circuit class in a regional setting.

Purpose: Guidelines recommend circuit classes to improve mobility after stroke. This study aimed to develop, deliver and evaluate an intervention to sustain a lower limb stroke circuit class in a regional setting in Australia.

Methods: This implementation study was guided by the Knowledge to Action framework with four phases. Phase 1: review of current circuit class practice. Phase 2: evaluation of health professional barriers and facilitators. Phase 3: development and delivery of a tailored implementation intervention based on the needs of health professionals. Phase 4: evaluation of sustainability and class outcomes.

Results: Phase 1: audit showed circuit classes had low attendance (n = 22/month). Phase 2: health professional participants (n = 21) identified key barriers and facilitators to delivering the circuit class, including a lack of training and confidence. Phase 3: the implementation intervention involved role modelling and training of health professionals conducting the class. Phase 4: average circuit class attendance increased and was maintained at follow-up (n = 32/month during intervention, n = 33/month post-intervention). Health professionals' confidence in others conducting the circuit class increased (43% pre-intervention to 92% post-intervention).

Conclusion: A tailored implementation intervention for health professionals in a regional community setting improved sustainability and increased confidence in conducting circuit classes for people with stroke.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Disability and Rehabilitation
Disability and Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
415
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信