经皮Chevron and Akin截骨术(PECA)是否需要Akin固定?回顾性比较研究,随访2年。

IF 1.4 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Gabriel Ferraz Ferreira, Gustavo Araujo Nunes, Gabriel Fiorin da Costa, Mauro Cesar Mattos E Dinato, Thomas Lorchan Lewis, Robbie Ray, Vitor Alves Patriarcha, Paulo Carvalho, Miguel Viana Pereira Filho
{"title":"经皮Chevron and Akin截骨术(PECA)是否需要Akin固定?回顾性比较研究,随访2年。","authors":"Gabriel Ferraz Ferreira, Gustavo Araujo Nunes, Gabriel Fiorin da Costa, Mauro Cesar Mattos E Dinato, Thomas Lorchan Lewis, Robbie Ray, Vitor Alves Patriarcha, Paulo Carvalho, Miguel Viana Pereira Filho","doi":"10.1007/s00590-025-04316-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Minimally invasive or percutaneous techniques for correcting hallux valgus (HV) have been increasingly prominent in scientific publications. However, the Akin osteotomy has received little attention. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether there is a difference between fixation or non-fixation of the Akin osteotomy for percutaneous HV correction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-one patients (47 feet) were retrospectively identified, with a minimum 2-year follow-up, and divided into two cohorts: The first cohort comprised 16 patients (24 feet, 8 bilateral) who underwent using the Percutaneous Chevron and Akin (PECA) technique with Akin osteotomy fixation, while the second cohort included 15 patients (23 feet, 8 bilateral) without Akin fixation. Pre- and post-operative radiographic and clinical outcomes, including assessment of pain measured on the Visual Analog Scale, function evaluated using the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society score, range of motion, and personal satisfaction, were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups showed improvement in all parameters after the surgical procedure (p < 0.05), except for the reduced range of motion (p < 0.001). There was no difference between the groups in radiographic angles, function, personal satisfaction, range of motion, and complications (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The non-fixation of the Akin osteotomy in the PECA technique for HV did not show clinical, radiographic, or complication differences when compared to Akin osteotomy fixation with a screw. Both groups demonstrated significant improvement in all parameters. However, a reduced range of motion (stiffness) was noted in the final evaluation.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, retrospective comparative study.</p>","PeriodicalId":50484,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology","volume":"35 1","pages":"212"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Akin fixation necessary in the Percutaneous Chevron and Akin osteotomies (PECA) technique? A retrospective comparative study with 2-year follow-up.\",\"authors\":\"Gabriel Ferraz Ferreira, Gustavo Araujo Nunes, Gabriel Fiorin da Costa, Mauro Cesar Mattos E Dinato, Thomas Lorchan Lewis, Robbie Ray, Vitor Alves Patriarcha, Paulo Carvalho, Miguel Viana Pereira Filho\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00590-025-04316-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Minimally invasive or percutaneous techniques for correcting hallux valgus (HV) have been increasingly prominent in scientific publications. However, the Akin osteotomy has received little attention. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether there is a difference between fixation or non-fixation of the Akin osteotomy for percutaneous HV correction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-one patients (47 feet) were retrospectively identified, with a minimum 2-year follow-up, and divided into two cohorts: The first cohort comprised 16 patients (24 feet, 8 bilateral) who underwent using the Percutaneous Chevron and Akin (PECA) technique with Akin osteotomy fixation, while the second cohort included 15 patients (23 feet, 8 bilateral) without Akin fixation. Pre- and post-operative radiographic and clinical outcomes, including assessment of pain measured on the Visual Analog Scale, function evaluated using the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society score, range of motion, and personal satisfaction, were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups showed improvement in all parameters after the surgical procedure (p < 0.05), except for the reduced range of motion (p < 0.001). There was no difference between the groups in radiographic angles, function, personal satisfaction, range of motion, and complications (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The non-fixation of the Akin osteotomy in the PECA technique for HV did not show clinical, radiographic, or complication differences when compared to Akin osteotomy fixation with a screw. Both groups demonstrated significant improvement in all parameters. However, a reduced range of motion (stiffness) was noted in the final evaluation.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, retrospective comparative study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"212\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-025-04316-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-025-04316-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:微创或经皮技术矫正拇外翻(HV)在科学出版物中越来越突出。然而,Akin截骨术很少受到关注。本研究的目的是评估经皮HV矫正中Akin截骨术的固定或不固定是否存在差异。方法:回顾性确定31例患者(47英尺),随访至少2年,并分为两个队列:第一队列包括16例患者(24英尺,8双侧),他们采用经皮Chevron and Akin (PECA)技术并采用Akin截骨固定,而第二队列包括15例患者(23英尺,8双侧)不采用Akin固定。进行术前和术后的影像学和临床结果,包括用视觉模拟量表评估疼痛,用美国骨科足踝协会评分评估功能,活动范围和个人满意度。结果:两组患者术后各项指标均有改善(p < 0.05)。结论:与Akin截骨螺钉固定相比,PECA技术治疗HV的非固定Akin截骨术在临床、影像学或并发症方面没有差异。两组在各项指标均有显著改善。然而,在最后的评估中注意到活动范围(刚度)减少。证据等级:III级,回顾性比较研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is Akin fixation necessary in the Percutaneous Chevron and Akin osteotomies (PECA) technique? A retrospective comparative study with 2-year follow-up.

Background: Minimally invasive or percutaneous techniques for correcting hallux valgus (HV) have been increasingly prominent in scientific publications. However, the Akin osteotomy has received little attention. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether there is a difference between fixation or non-fixation of the Akin osteotomy for percutaneous HV correction.

Methods: Thirty-one patients (47 feet) were retrospectively identified, with a minimum 2-year follow-up, and divided into two cohorts: The first cohort comprised 16 patients (24 feet, 8 bilateral) who underwent using the Percutaneous Chevron and Akin (PECA) technique with Akin osteotomy fixation, while the second cohort included 15 patients (23 feet, 8 bilateral) without Akin fixation. Pre- and post-operative radiographic and clinical outcomes, including assessment of pain measured on the Visual Analog Scale, function evaluated using the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society score, range of motion, and personal satisfaction, were conducted.

Results: Both groups showed improvement in all parameters after the surgical procedure (p < 0.05), except for the reduced range of motion (p < 0.001). There was no difference between the groups in radiographic angles, function, personal satisfaction, range of motion, and complications (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: The non-fixation of the Akin osteotomy in the PECA technique for HV did not show clinical, radiographic, or complication differences when compared to Akin osteotomy fixation with a screw. Both groups demonstrated significant improvement in all parameters. However, a reduced range of motion (stiffness) was noted in the final evaluation.

Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
265
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology (EJOST) aims to publish high quality Orthopedic scientific work. The objective of our journal is to disseminate meaningful, impactful, clinically relevant work from each and every region of the world, that has the potential to change and or inform clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信