新西兰奥特罗阿的亚洲和少数民族健康研究:灰色文献的范围审查(2011-2020)。

IF 1.2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Annie Chiang, Alina Meador, Roshini Peiris-John, Rachel Simon-Kumar
{"title":"新西兰奥特罗阿的亚洲和少数民族健康研究:灰色文献的范围审查(2011-2020)。","authors":"Annie Chiang, Alina Meador, Roshini Peiris-John, Rachel Simon-Kumar","doi":"10.26635/6965.6854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>A wealth of knowledge, especially on ethnic and migrant health, is located in \"grey literature\" (GL), i.e., material that is not formally published. This article reviews four types of GL: a) student theses, b) research reports, c) government, and d) non-government unpublished research on Asian and other ethnic minority (A/EM) health in Aotearoa New Zealand, covering a decade between 2011 and 2020.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A range of flexible data collection methods was used for each GL category. The application of inclusion and exclusion criteria resulted in the selection of 167 articles for review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Key themes on methodologies, participants and identities, acculturation, barriers to health and recommendations for changes in healthcare are highlighted in the findings. In general, there was greater representation of intersectional identities, deployment of non-Western methodologies to address A/EM health problems and a broader diversity of health conditions addressed in GL compared with published A/EM research.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All four GL categories are important knowledge bases for A/EM health in ways not captured in published research, with student research in particular offering creative and cutting-edge conceptual health frameworks. There needs to be greater visibility of GL, especially non-conventional frameworks and methodologies for A/EM health knowledge.</p>","PeriodicalId":48086,"journal":{"name":"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL","volume":"138 1615","pages":"53-94"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Asian and ethnic minority health research in Aotearoa New Zealand: a scoping review of grey literature (2011-2020).\",\"authors\":\"Annie Chiang, Alina Meador, Roshini Peiris-John, Rachel Simon-Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.26635/6965.6854\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>A wealth of knowledge, especially on ethnic and migrant health, is located in \\\"grey literature\\\" (GL), i.e., material that is not formally published. This article reviews four types of GL: a) student theses, b) research reports, c) government, and d) non-government unpublished research on Asian and other ethnic minority (A/EM) health in Aotearoa New Zealand, covering a decade between 2011 and 2020.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A range of flexible data collection methods was used for each GL category. The application of inclusion and exclusion criteria resulted in the selection of 167 articles for review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Key themes on methodologies, participants and identities, acculturation, barriers to health and recommendations for changes in healthcare are highlighted in the findings. In general, there was greater representation of intersectional identities, deployment of non-Western methodologies to address A/EM health problems and a broader diversity of health conditions addressed in GL compared with published A/EM research.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All four GL categories are important knowledge bases for A/EM health in ways not captured in published research, with student research in particular offering creative and cutting-edge conceptual health frameworks. There needs to be greater visibility of GL, especially non-conventional frameworks and methodologies for A/EM health knowledge.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL\",\"volume\":\"138 1615\",\"pages\":\"53-94\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26635/6965.6854\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26635/6965.6854","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:大量的知识,特别是关于族裔和移徙者健康的知识,存在于“灰色文献”中,即未正式发表的材料。本文回顾了四种类型的GL: a)学生论文,b)研究报告,c)政府和d)非政府未发表的关于新西兰Aotearoa亚洲和其他少数民族(a /EM)健康的研究,涵盖了2011年至2020年的十年。方法:对每个GL分类采用一系列灵活的数据收集方法。纳入和排除标准的应用导致选择167篇文章进行审查。结果:调查结果强调了方法、参与者和身份、文化适应、健康障碍和保健改革建议等关键主题。总的来说,与已发表的A/EM研究相比,GL中有更多的交叉身份代表,部署非西方方法来解决A/EM健康问题,以及更广泛的健康状况多样性。结论:所有四种GL类别都是A/EM健康的重要知识基础,其方式在已发表的研究中未被捕获,特别是学生研究提供了创造性和前沿的概念健康框架。需要提高GL的可见性,特别是针对甲型/新兴市场卫生知识的非常规框架和方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Asian and ethnic minority health research in Aotearoa New Zealand: a scoping review of grey literature (2011-2020).

Aims: A wealth of knowledge, especially on ethnic and migrant health, is located in "grey literature" (GL), i.e., material that is not formally published. This article reviews four types of GL: a) student theses, b) research reports, c) government, and d) non-government unpublished research on Asian and other ethnic minority (A/EM) health in Aotearoa New Zealand, covering a decade between 2011 and 2020.

Methods: A range of flexible data collection methods was used for each GL category. The application of inclusion and exclusion criteria resulted in the selection of 167 articles for review.

Results: Key themes on methodologies, participants and identities, acculturation, barriers to health and recommendations for changes in healthcare are highlighted in the findings. In general, there was greater representation of intersectional identities, deployment of non-Western methodologies to address A/EM health problems and a broader diversity of health conditions addressed in GL compared with published A/EM research.

Conclusion: All four GL categories are important knowledge bases for A/EM health in ways not captured in published research, with student research in particular offering creative and cutting-edge conceptual health frameworks. There needs to be greater visibility of GL, especially non-conventional frameworks and methodologies for A/EM health knowledge.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL
NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
23.50%
发文量
229
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信