期刊法庭:将医学法学教育纳入急诊医学期刊俱乐部的新途径。

Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-31 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.21980/J8093T
Kevin McGurk, Mary Jordan, Bradley Davis
{"title":"期刊法庭:将医学法学教育纳入急诊医学期刊俱乐部的新途径。","authors":"Kevin McGurk, Mary Jordan, Bradley Davis","doi":"10.21980/J8093T","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Audience: </strong>The target audience includes health professions students, residents, and fellows who participate in journal clubs.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Journal club plays an important role in teaching emergency medicine residents how to critically evaluate medical literature and apply it to their clinical practice. While there is some consensus on the general goals and objectives of journal club, significant variability exists between how different residency programs design and conduct them.1 Papers selected may address similar or disparate topics, highlight specific research applications, or demonstrate diverging evidence on a specific issue.2-5 While numerous approaches have been implemented and described, they do not traditionally entail a trial-based format.More than 7% of practicing physicians have a malpractice claim annually and more than one third will be sued in their lifetime.6,7 Some estimates indicate 75% of emergency medicine physicians will be named in a medical malpractice suit during their career.8 Despite this, the American College of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) has no specific requirement for medicolegal instruction during emergency medicine training.9 By structuring journal club to encompass a hypothetical medical malpractice lawsuit, our program sought to provide instruction on this topic while also fostering improved resident enthusiasm and participation.</p><p><strong>Educational objectives: </strong>By the end of this exercise, participants should: 1) identify the four necessary elements for a malpractice claim, 2) understand the basic structure of medical malpractice litigation, and 3) critically analyze medical literature representing diverging viewpoints or conclusions.</p><p><strong>Educational methods: </strong>Residents read two papers regarding fluid resuscitation in sepsis and a fictional case narrative and associated medical malpractice complaint. The case described a septic patient with a history of congestive heart failure who clinically decompensates after large volume IV fluid administration.10,11 After a brief faculty-led discussion on medical malpractice, a mock trial was conducted. Rather than a more conventional journal club format, the two presenting residents discussed the papers by citing them as evidence in their role as expert witnesses providing testimony on behalf of the plaintiff or defense. Each expert witness explained the strengths of their respective paper and highlighted the weaknesses of the opposing paper. A jury made up of resident attendees then deliberated and rendered a verdict followed by an open discussion among the entire group regarding both papers.</p><p><strong>Research methods: </strong>At the conclusion of the journal club, residents in attendance were asked to complete a brief and anonymous survey evaluating the activity. Questions utilized a 5-point Likert scale to assess the journal club's utility for teaching about research appraisal and the medical malpractice process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among respondents, 14/15 (93.3%) agreed or strongly agreed that the journal club had improved their understanding of clinical research and 14/15 (93.3%) agreed or strongly agreed that the journal club had improved their understanding of medical malpractice litigation. Narrative feedback was limited but uniformly positive and included comments such as \"Great journal club\" and \"This was one of the most engaging journal clubs I have ever been to, love the content as well as the format.\"</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Journal club is a novel and effective venue for introducing medicolegal education into an emergency medicine residency curriculum. With a brief presentation and informal mock trial, residents were exposed to the elements of malpractice as well as pertinent state laws regarding medical malpractice. They were able to verbalize understanding of these legal tenets and effectively apply them to a simulated scenario. Additionally, they were able to effectively analyze and compare medical literature and understand implications for clinical practice.The exercise required a little more preparation than the conventional journal club format but was inexpensive, well-received and could be easily replicated.</p><p><strong>Topics: </strong>Journal club, Emergency Medicine, medical malpractice, litigation, lawsuit, Torts, medical education, legal liability, medical errors.</p>","PeriodicalId":73721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine","volume":"10 1","pages":"SG1-SG11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12096896/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Journal Court: A Novel Approach to Incorporate Medicolegal Education into an Emergency Medicine Journal Club.\",\"authors\":\"Kevin McGurk, Mary Jordan, Bradley Davis\",\"doi\":\"10.21980/J8093T\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Audience: </strong>The target audience includes health professions students, residents, and fellows who participate in journal clubs.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Journal club plays an important role in teaching emergency medicine residents how to critically evaluate medical literature and apply it to their clinical practice. While there is some consensus on the general goals and objectives of journal club, significant variability exists between how different residency programs design and conduct them.1 Papers selected may address similar or disparate topics, highlight specific research applications, or demonstrate diverging evidence on a specific issue.2-5 While numerous approaches have been implemented and described, they do not traditionally entail a trial-based format.More than 7% of practicing physicians have a malpractice claim annually and more than one third will be sued in their lifetime.6,7 Some estimates indicate 75% of emergency medicine physicians will be named in a medical malpractice suit during their career.8 Despite this, the American College of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) has no specific requirement for medicolegal instruction during emergency medicine training.9 By structuring journal club to encompass a hypothetical medical malpractice lawsuit, our program sought to provide instruction on this topic while also fostering improved resident enthusiasm and participation.</p><p><strong>Educational objectives: </strong>By the end of this exercise, participants should: 1) identify the four necessary elements for a malpractice claim, 2) understand the basic structure of medical malpractice litigation, and 3) critically analyze medical literature representing diverging viewpoints or conclusions.</p><p><strong>Educational methods: </strong>Residents read two papers regarding fluid resuscitation in sepsis and a fictional case narrative and associated medical malpractice complaint. The case described a septic patient with a history of congestive heart failure who clinically decompensates after large volume IV fluid administration.10,11 After a brief faculty-led discussion on medical malpractice, a mock trial was conducted. Rather than a more conventional journal club format, the two presenting residents discussed the papers by citing them as evidence in their role as expert witnesses providing testimony on behalf of the plaintiff or defense. Each expert witness explained the strengths of their respective paper and highlighted the weaknesses of the opposing paper. A jury made up of resident attendees then deliberated and rendered a verdict followed by an open discussion among the entire group regarding both papers.</p><p><strong>Research methods: </strong>At the conclusion of the journal club, residents in attendance were asked to complete a brief and anonymous survey evaluating the activity. Questions utilized a 5-point Likert scale to assess the journal club's utility for teaching about research appraisal and the medical malpractice process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among respondents, 14/15 (93.3%) agreed or strongly agreed that the journal club had improved their understanding of clinical research and 14/15 (93.3%) agreed or strongly agreed that the journal club had improved their understanding of medical malpractice litigation. Narrative feedback was limited but uniformly positive and included comments such as \\\"Great journal club\\\" and \\\"This was one of the most engaging journal clubs I have ever been to, love the content as well as the format.\\\"</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Journal club is a novel and effective venue for introducing medicolegal education into an emergency medicine residency curriculum. With a brief presentation and informal mock trial, residents were exposed to the elements of malpractice as well as pertinent state laws regarding medical malpractice. They were able to verbalize understanding of these legal tenets and effectively apply them to a simulated scenario. Additionally, they were able to effectively analyze and compare medical literature and understand implications for clinical practice.The exercise required a little more preparation than the conventional journal club format but was inexpensive, well-received and could be easily replicated.</p><p><strong>Topics: </strong>Journal club, Emergency Medicine, medical malpractice, litigation, lawsuit, Torts, medical education, legal liability, medical errors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"SG1-SG11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12096896/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21980/J8093T\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21980/J8093T","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

读者:目标读者包括卫生专业的学生、住院医生和参加期刊俱乐部的研究员。导读:期刊俱乐部在教导急诊住院医师如何批判性地评价医学文献并将其应用于临床实践方面发挥着重要作用。虽然在期刊俱乐部的总体目标和目标上有一些共识,但不同的住院医师项目如何设计和实施它们之间存在着显著的差异选定的论文可能涉及类似或不同的主题,突出特定的研究应用,或在特定问题上展示不同的证据。虽然已经实施和描述了许多方法,但它们传统上并不需要基于试用的格式。超过7%的执业医生每年都有医疗事故索赔,超过三分之一的人将在他们的一生中被起诉。一些估计表明,75%的急诊医师在其职业生涯中会在医疗事故诉讼中被点名尽管如此,美国研究生医学教育学院(ACGME)在急诊医学培训中没有对医学法律教学的具体要求通过构建期刊俱乐部来包含一个假想的医疗事故诉讼,我们的项目试图提供关于这个主题的指导,同时也培养了居民的积极性和参与度。教育目标:在本练习结束时,参与者应该:1)确定医疗事故索赔的四个必要要素,2)了解医疗事故诉讼的基本结构,以及3)批判性地分析代表不同观点或结论的医学文献。教育方法:住院医师阅读两篇关于脓毒症液体复苏的论文和一篇虚构的病例叙述和相关的医疗事故投诉。该病例描述了一个脓毒症患者与充血性心力衰竭的历史,临床失代偿后大容量静脉输液。10,11在教师主导的关于医疗事故的简短讨论之后,进行了一次模拟审判。与传统的期刊俱乐部形式不同,两位出席会议的居民以专家证人的身份为原告或被告提供证词,并将这些文件作为证据进行讨论。每个专家证人都解释了各自论文的优点,并强调了对方论文的缺点。由常驻与会者组成的陪审团随后审议并作出裁决,然后在整个小组中就两篇论文进行公开讨论。研究方法:在杂志俱乐部结束时,要求参加活动的居民完成一份简短的匿名调查,以评估该活动。问题采用5分李克特量表来评估期刊俱乐部在研究评估和医疗事故过程教学中的效用。结果:14/15(93.3%)的受访者同意或强烈同意杂志社提高了他们对临床研究的了解,14/15(93.3%)的受访者同意或强烈同意杂志社提高了他们对医疗事故诉讼的了解。叙述反馈虽然有限,但都是积极的,包括“很棒的日记俱乐部”和“这是我去过的最吸引人的日记俱乐部之一,我喜欢它的内容和格式。”讨论:期刊俱乐部是将医学法律教育引入急诊医学住院医师课程的一个新颖而有效的场所。通过简短的介绍和非正式的模拟审判,居民们了解了医疗事故的要素以及有关医疗事故的州法律。他们能够用语言表达对这些法律原则的理解,并有效地将其应用于模拟场景。此外,他们能够有效地分析和比较医学文献,并了解对临床实践的影响。这种做法比传统的杂志俱乐部形式需要更多的准备,但费用不高,受到欢迎,而且很容易复制。主题:会刊、急诊医学、医疗事故、诉讼、诉讼、侵权、医学教育、法律责任、医疗差错。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Journal Court: A Novel Approach to Incorporate Medicolegal Education into an Emergency Medicine Journal Club.

Audience: The target audience includes health professions students, residents, and fellows who participate in journal clubs.

Introduction: Journal club plays an important role in teaching emergency medicine residents how to critically evaluate medical literature and apply it to their clinical practice. While there is some consensus on the general goals and objectives of journal club, significant variability exists between how different residency programs design and conduct them.1 Papers selected may address similar or disparate topics, highlight specific research applications, or demonstrate diverging evidence on a specific issue.2-5 While numerous approaches have been implemented and described, they do not traditionally entail a trial-based format.More than 7% of practicing physicians have a malpractice claim annually and more than one third will be sued in their lifetime.6,7 Some estimates indicate 75% of emergency medicine physicians will be named in a medical malpractice suit during their career.8 Despite this, the American College of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) has no specific requirement for medicolegal instruction during emergency medicine training.9 By structuring journal club to encompass a hypothetical medical malpractice lawsuit, our program sought to provide instruction on this topic while also fostering improved resident enthusiasm and participation.

Educational objectives: By the end of this exercise, participants should: 1) identify the four necessary elements for a malpractice claim, 2) understand the basic structure of medical malpractice litigation, and 3) critically analyze medical literature representing diverging viewpoints or conclusions.

Educational methods: Residents read two papers regarding fluid resuscitation in sepsis and a fictional case narrative and associated medical malpractice complaint. The case described a septic patient with a history of congestive heart failure who clinically decompensates after large volume IV fluid administration.10,11 After a brief faculty-led discussion on medical malpractice, a mock trial was conducted. Rather than a more conventional journal club format, the two presenting residents discussed the papers by citing them as evidence in their role as expert witnesses providing testimony on behalf of the plaintiff or defense. Each expert witness explained the strengths of their respective paper and highlighted the weaknesses of the opposing paper. A jury made up of resident attendees then deliberated and rendered a verdict followed by an open discussion among the entire group regarding both papers.

Research methods: At the conclusion of the journal club, residents in attendance were asked to complete a brief and anonymous survey evaluating the activity. Questions utilized a 5-point Likert scale to assess the journal club's utility for teaching about research appraisal and the medical malpractice process.

Results: Among respondents, 14/15 (93.3%) agreed or strongly agreed that the journal club had improved their understanding of clinical research and 14/15 (93.3%) agreed or strongly agreed that the journal club had improved their understanding of medical malpractice litigation. Narrative feedback was limited but uniformly positive and included comments such as "Great journal club" and "This was one of the most engaging journal clubs I have ever been to, love the content as well as the format."

Discussion: Journal club is a novel and effective venue for introducing medicolegal education into an emergency medicine residency curriculum. With a brief presentation and informal mock trial, residents were exposed to the elements of malpractice as well as pertinent state laws regarding medical malpractice. They were able to verbalize understanding of these legal tenets and effectively apply them to a simulated scenario. Additionally, they were able to effectively analyze and compare medical literature and understand implications for clinical practice.The exercise required a little more preparation than the conventional journal club format but was inexpensive, well-received and could be easily replicated.

Topics: Journal club, Emergency Medicine, medical malpractice, litigation, lawsuit, Torts, medical education, legal liability, medical errors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信