南非医护人员12项一般健康问卷的信度、效度和维度。

African Journal of Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2024-10-17 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4102/ajopa.v6i0.144
Clement N Kufe, Colleen Bernstein, Kerry Wilson
{"title":"南非医护人员12项一般健康问卷的信度、效度和维度。","authors":"Clement N Kufe, Colleen Bernstein, Kerry Wilson","doi":"10.4102/ajopa.v6i0.144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Healthcare workers (HCWs) were among the high-risk groups for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and suffer a high burden of challenges with mental health including depression, anxiety, traumatic stress, avoidance and burnout. The 12-Item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) has shown the best fit in both a one-factor structure and a multidimensional structure for the screening of common mental disorders and psychiatric well-being. The aim was to test for reliability and validity and ascertain the factor structure of the GHQ-12 in a South African HCW population. Data were collected from 832 public hospital and clinic staff during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in Gauteng, South Africa. The factor structure of the GHQ-12 in this professional population was examined by exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to identify factors, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) for construct validity and structural equation modelling (SEM) to establish model fit. The GHQ-12 median score was higher (<i>n</i> = 25) in women than in men (<i>n</i> = 24), <i>p</i> = 0.044. The assumptions for inferential statistics were tested: the determinant for the correlation matrix was 0.034, Bartlett's test of sphericity was <i>p</i> < 0.001, Chi-square 2262.171 and the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) of sampling adequacy was 0.877. The four factors identified were labelled as social dysfunction (37.8%), anxiety depression (35.4%), capable (24.9%) and self-efficacy (22.7%). The sample had a Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's Omega coefficient of 0.85.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>The study highlighted the gaps in the use of GHQ-12. The findings affirm the validity and reliability of the GHQ-12 in this group of professionals and the multidimensional structure for screening for psychological distress.</p>","PeriodicalId":34043,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Psychological Assessment","volume":"6 ","pages":"144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12082264/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability, validity and dimensionality of the 12-Item General Health Questionnaire among South African healthcare workers.\",\"authors\":\"Clement N Kufe, Colleen Bernstein, Kerry Wilson\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/ajopa.v6i0.144\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Healthcare workers (HCWs) were among the high-risk groups for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and suffer a high burden of challenges with mental health including depression, anxiety, traumatic stress, avoidance and burnout. The 12-Item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) has shown the best fit in both a one-factor structure and a multidimensional structure for the screening of common mental disorders and psychiatric well-being. The aim was to test for reliability and validity and ascertain the factor structure of the GHQ-12 in a South African HCW population. Data were collected from 832 public hospital and clinic staff during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in Gauteng, South Africa. The factor structure of the GHQ-12 in this professional population was examined by exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to identify factors, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) for construct validity and structural equation modelling (SEM) to establish model fit. The GHQ-12 median score was higher (<i>n</i> = 25) in women than in men (<i>n</i> = 24), <i>p</i> = 0.044. The assumptions for inferential statistics were tested: the determinant for the correlation matrix was 0.034, Bartlett's test of sphericity was <i>p</i> < 0.001, Chi-square 2262.171 and the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) of sampling adequacy was 0.877. The four factors identified were labelled as social dysfunction (37.8%), anxiety depression (35.4%), capable (24.9%) and self-efficacy (22.7%). The sample had a Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's Omega coefficient of 0.85.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>The study highlighted the gaps in the use of GHQ-12. The findings affirm the validity and reliability of the GHQ-12 in this group of professionals and the multidimensional structure for screening for psychological distress.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Journal of Psychological Assessment\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"144\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12082264/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Journal of Psychological Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/ajopa.v6i0.144\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Psychological Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/ajopa.v6i0.144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

卫生保健工作者(HCWs)是严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2 (SARS-CoV-2)感染的高危人群之一,在心理健康方面面临着沉重的负担,包括抑郁、焦虑、创伤性应激、逃避和倦怠。12项一般健康问卷(GHQ-12)显示出最适合用于筛查常见精神障碍和精神健康的单因素结构和多维结构。目的是测试南非HCW人群中GHQ-12的信度和效度,并确定其因子结构。在2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间,收集了南非豪登省832家公立医院和诊所工作人员的数据。采用探索性因子分析(EFA)确定因子,验证性因子分析(CFA)确定结构效度,结构方程建模(SEM)建立模型拟合,对该职业人群GHQ-12的因子结构进行检验。女性GHQ-12中位评分(n = 25)高于男性(n = 24), p = 0.044。对推论统计的假设进行检验:相关矩阵的行列式为0.034,Bartlett's球形检验p < 0.001,卡方2262.171,抽样充分性的KMO为0.877。社会功能障碍(37.8%)、焦虑抑郁(35.4%)、能力(24.9%)和自我效能感(22.7%)是影响心理健康的主要因素。样本的Cronbach's alpha和McDonald's Omega系数为0.85。贡献:该研究强调了GHQ-12使用中的差距。研究结果证实了GHQ-12在这组专业人员中的有效性和可靠性,以及筛查心理困扰的多维结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reliability, validity and dimensionality of the 12-Item General Health Questionnaire among South African healthcare workers.

Healthcare workers (HCWs) were among the high-risk groups for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and suffer a high burden of challenges with mental health including depression, anxiety, traumatic stress, avoidance and burnout. The 12-Item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) has shown the best fit in both a one-factor structure and a multidimensional structure for the screening of common mental disorders and psychiatric well-being. The aim was to test for reliability and validity and ascertain the factor structure of the GHQ-12 in a South African HCW population. Data were collected from 832 public hospital and clinic staff during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in Gauteng, South Africa. The factor structure of the GHQ-12 in this professional population was examined by exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to identify factors, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) for construct validity and structural equation modelling (SEM) to establish model fit. The GHQ-12 median score was higher (n = 25) in women than in men (n = 24), p = 0.044. The assumptions for inferential statistics were tested: the determinant for the correlation matrix was 0.034, Bartlett's test of sphericity was p < 0.001, Chi-square 2262.171 and the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) of sampling adequacy was 0.877. The four factors identified were labelled as social dysfunction (37.8%), anxiety depression (35.4%), capable (24.9%) and self-efficacy (22.7%). The sample had a Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's Omega coefficient of 0.85.

Contribution: The study highlighted the gaps in the use of GHQ-12. The findings affirm the validity and reliability of the GHQ-12 in this group of professionals and the multidimensional structure for screening for psychological distress.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信