{"title":"布基纳法索Dedougou地区医院中心(CHR)外科服务使用者对骨合成材料的知识、态度和实践。","authors":"Abdramane Berthe","doi":"10.3917/spub.251.0225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Osteosynthesis materials (OSM) are raising concerns among patients and medical staff, influencing attitudes and practices related to their use. Research in sociology and anthropology on these materials is limited, justifying a study of the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of users of the surgical department at the Regional Hospital Center (CHR) of Dédougou (Burkina Faso).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a descriptive cross-sectional mixed-methods study. A sample of 310 users was selected for the administration of a digital questionnaire. Semi-structured interviews with 51 individuals explored detailed perceptions and experiences concerning osteosynthesis materials (OSM). The data were analyzed using QDA Miner, with strict adherence to ethical principles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of users (63%) had heard of OSM, mainly from informal sources, but only 53% understood its advantages and disadvantages. Attitudes were predominantly positive, with 82% willing to use OSM if necessary, although 18% expressed reluctance due to high costs and cultural prejudices. Nearly 29% of users had experienced a fracture, with 50% having been offered OSM. Effective communication between caregivers and patients is crucial to improving the understanding and acceptance of OSM.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study highlights the need to strengthen communication and education strategies for better understanding of OSM. Efforts should include policies to make OSM financially accessible, integrate cultural concerns into care planning, and improve the training of healthcare professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":49575,"journal":{"name":"Sante Publique","volume":"37 1","pages":"225-237"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Connaissances, attitudes et pratiques du matériel d’ostéosynthèse chez les usagers du service de chirurgie au Centre Hospitalier Régional (CHR) de Dédougou (Burkina Faso).\",\"authors\":\"Abdramane Berthe\",\"doi\":\"10.3917/spub.251.0225\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Osteosynthesis materials (OSM) are raising concerns among patients and medical staff, influencing attitudes and practices related to their use. Research in sociology and anthropology on these materials is limited, justifying a study of the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of users of the surgical department at the Regional Hospital Center (CHR) of Dédougou (Burkina Faso).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a descriptive cross-sectional mixed-methods study. A sample of 310 users was selected for the administration of a digital questionnaire. Semi-structured interviews with 51 individuals explored detailed perceptions and experiences concerning osteosynthesis materials (OSM). The data were analyzed using QDA Miner, with strict adherence to ethical principles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of users (63%) had heard of OSM, mainly from informal sources, but only 53% understood its advantages and disadvantages. Attitudes were predominantly positive, with 82% willing to use OSM if necessary, although 18% expressed reluctance due to high costs and cultural prejudices. Nearly 29% of users had experienced a fracture, with 50% having been offered OSM. Effective communication between caregivers and patients is crucial to improving the understanding and acceptance of OSM.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study highlights the need to strengthen communication and education strategies for better understanding of OSM. Efforts should include policies to make OSM financially accessible, integrate cultural concerns into care planning, and improve the training of healthcare professionals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sante Publique\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"225-237\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sante Publique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3917/spub.251.0225\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sante Publique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/spub.251.0225","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Connaissances, attitudes et pratiques du matériel d’ostéosynthèse chez les usagers du service de chirurgie au Centre Hospitalier Régional (CHR) de Dédougou (Burkina Faso).
Introduction: Osteosynthesis materials (OSM) are raising concerns among patients and medical staff, influencing attitudes and practices related to their use. Research in sociology and anthropology on these materials is limited, justifying a study of the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of users of the surgical department at the Regional Hospital Center (CHR) of Dédougou (Burkina Faso).
Methods: This is a descriptive cross-sectional mixed-methods study. A sample of 310 users was selected for the administration of a digital questionnaire. Semi-structured interviews with 51 individuals explored detailed perceptions and experiences concerning osteosynthesis materials (OSM). The data were analyzed using QDA Miner, with strict adherence to ethical principles.
Results: The majority of users (63%) had heard of OSM, mainly from informal sources, but only 53% understood its advantages and disadvantages. Attitudes were predominantly positive, with 82% willing to use OSM if necessary, although 18% expressed reluctance due to high costs and cultural prejudices. Nearly 29% of users had experienced a fracture, with 50% having been offered OSM. Effective communication between caregivers and patients is crucial to improving the understanding and acceptance of OSM.
Conclusion: The study highlights the need to strengthen communication and education strategies for better understanding of OSM. Efforts should include policies to make OSM financially accessible, integrate cultural concerns into care planning, and improve the training of healthcare professionals.
期刊介绍:
La revue Santé Publique s’adresse à l’ensemble des acteurs de santé publique qu’ils soient décideurs,
professionnels de santé, acteurs de terrain, chercheurs, enseignants ou formateurs, etc. Elle publie
des travaux de recherche, des évaluations, des analyses d’action, des réflexions sur des interventions
de santé, des opinions, relevant des champs de la santé publique et de l’analyse des services de
soins, des sciences sociales et de l’action sociale.
Santé publique est une revue à comité de lecture, multidisciplinaire et généraliste, qui publie sur
l’ensemble des thèmes de la santé publique parmi lesquels : accès et recours aux soins, déterminants
et inégalités sociales de santé, prévention, éducation pour la santé, promotion de la santé,
organisation des soins, environnement, formation des professionnels de santé, nutrition, politiques
de santé, pratiques professionnelles, qualité des soins, gestion des risques sanitaires, représentation
et santé perçue, santé scolaire, santé et travail, systèmes de santé, systèmes d’information, veille
sanitaire, déterminants de la consommation de soins, organisation et économie des différents
secteurs de production de soins (hôpital, médicament, etc.), évaluation médico-économique
d’activités de soins ou de prévention et de programmes de santé, planification des ressources,
politiques de régulation et de financement, etc