{"title":"扎鲁替尼与依鲁替尼治疗的患者的毒性、无进展生存期和生活质量:来自ALPINE研究的复发或难治性慢性淋巴细胞白血病的Q-TWiST分析。","authors":"Vincent Lévy, Tushar Srivastava, Raju Gautam, Shilpi Swami, Kaijun Wang, Keri Yang, Leyla Mohseninejad","doi":"10.1080/10428194.2025.2506501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Zanubrutinib demonstrated significantly longer progression-free survival versus ibrutinib in patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (R/R CLL) in the ALPINE trial. This post-hoc analysis using ALPINE data aimed to understand the benefit-risk associated with zanubrutinib versus ibrutinib employing quality-adjusted time without symptoms/toxicity (Q-TWiST) methodology. Survival data were partitioned into 3 health-states: TOX (time with toxicity); TWiST (time without symptoms/toxicity); and REL (time after relapse). Q-TWiST was estimated as mean time in each health-state weighted by respective utility score. In the base case, comprising high-risk patients, mean durations (in months) for zanubrutinib versus ibrutinib were 11.54 versus 11.38 (TOX), 14.45 versus 11.09 (TWiST), and 1.70 versus 3.78 (REL). Mean duration of Q-TWiST was 21.07 (zanubrutinib) versus 18.67 months (ibrutinib; difference: 2.40 months; 95%CI: 1.9-2.9; <i>p</i><.001). This analysis demonstrated a significant Q-TWiST gain for zanubrutinib versus ibrutinib in high-risk R/R CLL patients, providing valuable insights that may inform clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":18047,"journal":{"name":"Leukemia & Lymphoma","volume":" ","pages":"1884-1892"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toxicity, progression-free survival, and quality of life of patients treated with zanubrutinib versus ibrutinib: a Q-TWiST analysis from the ALPINE study in relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia.\",\"authors\":\"Vincent Lévy, Tushar Srivastava, Raju Gautam, Shilpi Swami, Kaijun Wang, Keri Yang, Leyla Mohseninejad\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10428194.2025.2506501\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Zanubrutinib demonstrated significantly longer progression-free survival versus ibrutinib in patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (R/R CLL) in the ALPINE trial. This post-hoc analysis using ALPINE data aimed to understand the benefit-risk associated with zanubrutinib versus ibrutinib employing quality-adjusted time without symptoms/toxicity (Q-TWiST) methodology. Survival data were partitioned into 3 health-states: TOX (time with toxicity); TWiST (time without symptoms/toxicity); and REL (time after relapse). Q-TWiST was estimated as mean time in each health-state weighted by respective utility score. In the base case, comprising high-risk patients, mean durations (in months) for zanubrutinib versus ibrutinib were 11.54 versus 11.38 (TOX), 14.45 versus 11.09 (TWiST), and 1.70 versus 3.78 (REL). Mean duration of Q-TWiST was 21.07 (zanubrutinib) versus 18.67 months (ibrutinib; difference: 2.40 months; 95%CI: 1.9-2.9; <i>p</i><.001). This analysis demonstrated a significant Q-TWiST gain for zanubrutinib versus ibrutinib in high-risk R/R CLL patients, providing valuable insights that may inform clinical decision-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Leukemia & Lymphoma\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1884-1892\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Leukemia & Lymphoma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2025.2506501\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leukemia & Lymphoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2025.2506501","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Toxicity, progression-free survival, and quality of life of patients treated with zanubrutinib versus ibrutinib: a Q-TWiST analysis from the ALPINE study in relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
Zanubrutinib demonstrated significantly longer progression-free survival versus ibrutinib in patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (R/R CLL) in the ALPINE trial. This post-hoc analysis using ALPINE data aimed to understand the benefit-risk associated with zanubrutinib versus ibrutinib employing quality-adjusted time without symptoms/toxicity (Q-TWiST) methodology. Survival data were partitioned into 3 health-states: TOX (time with toxicity); TWiST (time without symptoms/toxicity); and REL (time after relapse). Q-TWiST was estimated as mean time in each health-state weighted by respective utility score. In the base case, comprising high-risk patients, mean durations (in months) for zanubrutinib versus ibrutinib were 11.54 versus 11.38 (TOX), 14.45 versus 11.09 (TWiST), and 1.70 versus 3.78 (REL). Mean duration of Q-TWiST was 21.07 (zanubrutinib) versus 18.67 months (ibrutinib; difference: 2.40 months; 95%CI: 1.9-2.9; p<.001). This analysis demonstrated a significant Q-TWiST gain for zanubrutinib versus ibrutinib in high-risk R/R CLL patients, providing valuable insights that may inform clinical decision-making.
期刊介绍:
Leukemia & Lymphoma in its fourth decade continues to provide an international forum for publication of high quality clinical, translational, and basic science research, and original observations relating to all aspects of hematological malignancies. The scope ranges from clinical and clinico-pathological investigations to fundamental research in disease biology, mechanisms of action of novel agents, development of combination chemotherapy, pharmacology and pharmacogenomics as well as ethics and epidemiology. Submissions of unique clinical observations or confirmatory studies are considered and published as Letters to the Editor