安宁疗护和缓和医学医师的基本心理健康能力:一项德尔菲研究。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Lisa Podgurski, Danielle Chammas, Keri O Brenner, Leah B Rosenberg, Neha G Goyal, Maria I Lapid, Sue E Morris, William F Pirl, Bridget Sumser, Benjamin W Thompson, Lindsey Wright, Daniel Shalev
{"title":"安宁疗护和缓和医学医师的基本心理健康能力:一项德尔菲研究。","authors":"Lisa Podgurski, Danielle Chammas, Keri O Brenner, Leah B Rosenberg, Neha G Goyal, Maria I Lapid, Sue E Morris, William F Pirl, Bridget Sumser, Benjamin W Thompson, Lindsey Wright, Daniel Shalev","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.05.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Psychiatric and psychological care in serious illness is a core domain of hospice and palliative medicine (HPM), encompassing both normative psychosocial responses and mental health comorbidities. While social workers serve as psychosocial leaders on HPM interdisciplinary teams, commitment to supporting whole-person care remains the responsibility of the entire team. However, training and scope of practice for HPM physicians in the mental health domain are poorly standardized.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To establish and prioritize 'primary mental health competencies' for specialist hospice and palliative medicine physicians using expert consensus methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We convened a panel of 8 physicians, 1 social worker, 2 psychologists, and 1 nurse practitioner with expertise at the intersection of palliative care and mental health. Using group meetings and 1:1 interviews with the project leads, the expert panel generated initial competencies. A purposive voting panel of 36 palliative care physicians representing a range of practice settings and areas of career focus finalized high-priority competencies using a two-phase modified Delphi approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The expert panel proposed 68 competencies divided into: (A) psychological foundations of serious illness care, (B) diagnosis and management of mental health disorders in serious illness, and (C) systems-based practice. After first-round voting, 23 competencies were recirculated for a second vote. Following second-round voting, 32 competencies were included in the final list: 7 from part A, 20 from part B, and 5 from part C.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This consensus-based, expert-led process successfully generated and prioritized essential competencies in the psychological and psychiatric aspects of palliative care for specialist physicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Primary Mental Health Competencies for Hospice and Palliative Medicine Physicians: A Delphi Study.\",\"authors\":\"Lisa Podgurski, Danielle Chammas, Keri O Brenner, Leah B Rosenberg, Neha G Goyal, Maria I Lapid, Sue E Morris, William F Pirl, Bridget Sumser, Benjamin W Thompson, Lindsey Wright, Daniel Shalev\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.05.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Psychiatric and psychological care in serious illness is a core domain of hospice and palliative medicine (HPM), encompassing both normative psychosocial responses and mental health comorbidities. While social workers serve as psychosocial leaders on HPM interdisciplinary teams, commitment to supporting whole-person care remains the responsibility of the entire team. However, training and scope of practice for HPM physicians in the mental health domain are poorly standardized.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To establish and prioritize 'primary mental health competencies' for specialist hospice and palliative medicine physicians using expert consensus methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We convened a panel of 8 physicians, 1 social worker, 2 psychologists, and 1 nurse practitioner with expertise at the intersection of palliative care and mental health. Using group meetings and 1:1 interviews with the project leads, the expert panel generated initial competencies. A purposive voting panel of 36 palliative care physicians representing a range of practice settings and areas of career focus finalized high-priority competencies using a two-phase modified Delphi approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The expert panel proposed 68 competencies divided into: (A) psychological foundations of serious illness care, (B) diagnosis and management of mental health disorders in serious illness, and (C) systems-based practice. After first-round voting, 23 competencies were recirculated for a second vote. Following second-round voting, 32 competencies were included in the final list: 7 from part A, 20 from part B, and 5 from part C.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This consensus-based, expert-led process successfully generated and prioritized essential competencies in the psychological and psychiatric aspects of palliative care for specialist physicians.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pain and symptom management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pain and symptom management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.05.009\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pain and symptom management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.05.009","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:严重疾病的精神病学和心理护理是临终关怀和姑息医学(HPM)的核心领域,包括规范的社会心理反应和精神健康合并症。虽然社会工作者在HPM跨学科团队中担任心理社会领导者,但整个团队仍然有责任支持全人护理。然而,心理健康领域的HPM医生的培训和实践范围缺乏标准化。目的:采用专家共识方法,为专业临终关怀和姑息医学医师建立和优先考虑“初级心理健康能力”。方法:我们召集了一个由8名医生、1名社会工作者、2名心理学家和1名具有姑息治疗和心理健康交叉专业知识的执业护士组成的小组。通过小组会议和与项目负责人的1:1访谈,专家小组产生了最初的能力。一个由36名姑息治疗医生组成的有目的的投票小组,代表了一系列的实践环境和职业重点领域,使用两阶段改进的德尔菲方法确定了高优先级的能力。结果:专家小组提出了68项能力,分为:(A)严重疾病护理的心理基础,(B)严重疾病中精神健康障碍的诊断和管理,以及(C)基于系统的实践。在第一轮投票之后,23个选区进行了第二轮投票。经过第二轮投票,32项能力被列入最终名单:A部分7项,B部分20项,c部分5项。结论:这一基于共识、专家主导的过程成功地为专科医生在姑息治疗的心理和精神方面产生了基本能力,并对其进行了优先排序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Primary Mental Health Competencies for Hospice and Palliative Medicine Physicians: A Delphi Study.

Context: Psychiatric and psychological care in serious illness is a core domain of hospice and palliative medicine (HPM), encompassing both normative psychosocial responses and mental health comorbidities. While social workers serve as psychosocial leaders on HPM interdisciplinary teams, commitment to supporting whole-person care remains the responsibility of the entire team. However, training and scope of practice for HPM physicians in the mental health domain are poorly standardized.

Objectives: To establish and prioritize 'primary mental health competencies' for specialist hospice and palliative medicine physicians using expert consensus methods.

Methods: We convened a panel of 8 physicians, 1 social worker, 2 psychologists, and 1 nurse practitioner with expertise at the intersection of palliative care and mental health. Using group meetings and 1:1 interviews with the project leads, the expert panel generated initial competencies. A purposive voting panel of 36 palliative care physicians representing a range of practice settings and areas of career focus finalized high-priority competencies using a two-phase modified Delphi approach.

Results: The expert panel proposed 68 competencies divided into: (A) psychological foundations of serious illness care, (B) diagnosis and management of mental health disorders in serious illness, and (C) systems-based practice. After first-round voting, 23 competencies were recirculated for a second vote. Following second-round voting, 32 competencies were included in the final list: 7 from part A, 20 from part B, and 5 from part C.

Conclusions: This consensus-based, expert-led process successfully generated and prioritized essential competencies in the psychological and psychiatric aspects of palliative care for specialist physicians.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.40%
发文量
821
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain and Symptom Management is an internationally respected, peer-reviewed journal and serves an interdisciplinary audience of professionals by providing a forum for the publication of the latest clinical research and best practices related to the relief of illness burden among patients afflicted with serious or life-threatening illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信