新生儿遗传筛查(NBS)的参与式工作流程分析,以支持改进随访的工具:比较美国各州血红蛋白病特征的用例

IF 4 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Peter Taber, Jennifer Baysinger, Sierra Daniels, Natalie Diaz-Kincaid, Amy Gaviglio, Jacob Ginter, Patrice K Held, Emily Reeves, Virginia Sack, Jennifer Weaver, Karen Eilbeck
{"title":"新生儿遗传筛查(NBS)的参与式工作流程分析,以支持改进随访的工具:比较美国各州血红蛋白病特征的用例","authors":"Peter Taber, Jennifer Baysinger, Sierra Daniels, Natalie Diaz-Kincaid, Amy Gaviglio, Jacob Ginter, Patrice K Held, Emily Reeves, Virginia Sack, Jennifer Weaver, Karen Eilbeck","doi":"10.3390/ijns11020040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Communication of newborn screening (NBS) results often fails to provide clear explanations of NBS screen results to parents. Understanding existing NBS workflows is vital for improving NBS follow-up. We sought to describe a diverse range of state NBS programs as a starting point for designing tools to improve NBS follow-up, using the example of hemoglobinopathy traits. At a workshop of the 2023 Association of Public Health Laboratories NBS Symposium, participants filled out a survey and modeled their state workflows. Salient features were extracted and synthesized by state. A subset of models was member checked. Representatives from 19 U.S. states participated in the workflow analysis. Mail was overwhelmingly relied upon to convey the results. NBS programs differed by point of first contact with parents and degree of reliance on third parties. A participatory approach is useful for the rapid preliminary documentation of existing NBS program diversity and opportunities and challenges to improve patient education and follow-up. Future work should broaden the analysis to additional entities or individuals, particularly parents and caregivers.</p>","PeriodicalId":14159,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Neonatal Screening","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12101280/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Participatory Workflow Analysis of Newborn Genetic Screening (NBS) to Support Tools for Improved Follow-Up: Comparing the Use Case of Hemoglobinopathy Traits Across U.S. States.\",\"authors\":\"Peter Taber, Jennifer Baysinger, Sierra Daniels, Natalie Diaz-Kincaid, Amy Gaviglio, Jacob Ginter, Patrice K Held, Emily Reeves, Virginia Sack, Jennifer Weaver, Karen Eilbeck\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/ijns11020040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Communication of newborn screening (NBS) results often fails to provide clear explanations of NBS screen results to parents. Understanding existing NBS workflows is vital for improving NBS follow-up. We sought to describe a diverse range of state NBS programs as a starting point for designing tools to improve NBS follow-up, using the example of hemoglobinopathy traits. At a workshop of the 2023 Association of Public Health Laboratories NBS Symposium, participants filled out a survey and modeled their state workflows. Salient features were extracted and synthesized by state. A subset of models was member checked. Representatives from 19 U.S. states participated in the workflow analysis. Mail was overwhelmingly relied upon to convey the results. NBS programs differed by point of first contact with parents and degree of reliance on third parties. A participatory approach is useful for the rapid preliminary documentation of existing NBS program diversity and opportunities and challenges to improve patient education and follow-up. Future work should broaden the analysis to additional entities or individuals, particularly parents and caregivers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Neonatal Screening\",\"volume\":\"11 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12101280/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Neonatal Screening\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns11020040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Neonatal Screening","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns11020040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新生儿筛查结果的沟通往往不能向家长提供新生儿筛查结果的明确解释。了解现有的国家统计局工作流程对于改善国家统计局的后续工作至关重要。我们试图以血红蛋白病特征为例,描述各州NBS项目的多样性,作为设计工具以改善NBS随访的起点。在2023年公共卫生实验室协会NBS研讨会的一个研讨会上,参与者填写了一份调查问卷,并对他们的工作流程进行了建模。根据状态提取并合成显著特征。对模型的一个子集进行成员检查。来自美国19个州的代表参与了工作流程分析。绝大多数人都依赖邮件来传达结果。国家统计局的计划在与父母的第一次接触点和对第三方的依赖程度上有所不同。参与式方法有助于快速初步记录现有国家统计局项目的多样性,以及改善患者教育和随访的机遇和挑战。今后的工作应将分析范围扩大到更多的实体或个人,特别是父母和照顾者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Participatory Workflow Analysis of Newborn Genetic Screening (NBS) to Support Tools for Improved Follow-Up: Comparing the Use Case of Hemoglobinopathy Traits Across U.S. States.

Communication of newborn screening (NBS) results often fails to provide clear explanations of NBS screen results to parents. Understanding existing NBS workflows is vital for improving NBS follow-up. We sought to describe a diverse range of state NBS programs as a starting point for designing tools to improve NBS follow-up, using the example of hemoglobinopathy traits. At a workshop of the 2023 Association of Public Health Laboratories NBS Symposium, participants filled out a survey and modeled their state workflows. Salient features were extracted and synthesized by state. A subset of models was member checked. Representatives from 19 U.S. states participated in the workflow analysis. Mail was overwhelmingly relied upon to convey the results. NBS programs differed by point of first contact with parents and degree of reliance on third parties. A participatory approach is useful for the rapid preliminary documentation of existing NBS program diversity and opportunities and challenges to improve patient education and follow-up. Future work should broaden the analysis to additional entities or individuals, particularly parents and caregivers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Neonatal Screening
International Journal of Neonatal Screening Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信