Andrej Hlinčík , Tadeáš Fülöp , Peter Herich , Jozef Kožíšek , Karol Lušpai , Lukáš Bučinský
{"title":"多极模型优化的柔性问题。四(μ-醋酸)二水铜模型体系的DFT基准研究。","authors":"Andrej Hlinčík , Tadeáš Fülöp , Peter Herich , Jozef Kožíšek , Karol Lušpai , Lukáš Bučinský","doi":"10.1107/S2052252525003355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The refinement flexibility of the Hansen–Coppens multipole model is tested on DFT calculated structure factors for the tetrakis(μ-acetato)diaquadicopper model system. The Cu scattering factor performs the best of all the options tried for most of the monitored parameters despite the Cu<sup>2+</sup> nature of the complex studied. The Hansen–Coppens model performs similarly well when comparing deviations among computational chemistry methods.</div></div><div><div>In this study, the flexibility of the multipole Hansen–Coppens (HC) model refinement is investigated on calculated structure factors from a DFT reference for the tetrakis(μ-acetato)diaquadicopper model system (CCDC reference 1811668). The effect of the resolution [sin(θ)/λ], the Cu scattering factor, the inclusion of anisotropic displacement parameters and the positions of the atoms in the refinement are considered in terms of statistical error analysis, residual and deformation density maps, Atoms In Molecules parameters, <em>d</em>-orbital populations, and others. The choice of the neutral Cu scattering factor in the HC refinement is found to give the most satisfactory results for most of the monitored parameters, despite the formal Cu<sup>2+</sup> nature of copper in the studied complex. In order to put the difference between the HC model and the reference DFT (BLYP functional) results on the right scale, several computational chemistry methods (B3LYP, Hartree–Fock, Møller–Plesset perturbation theory and Coupled Clusters Singles and Doubles) were compared with the chosen DFT reference. Differences in the magnitudes of the structure factors and AIM parameters are presented, including considerations of relativistic effects and periodic boundary conditions, <em>i.e.</em> a comparison of a molecular crystal calculation versus an isolated molecule in the crystal.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14775,"journal":{"name":"IUCrJ","volume":"12 4","pages":"Pages 444-461"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the flexibility of the multipole model refinement. A DFT benchmark study of the tetrakis(μ-acetato)diaquadicopper model system\",\"authors\":\"Andrej Hlinčík , Tadeáš Fülöp , Peter Herich , Jozef Kožíšek , Karol Lušpai , Lukáš Bučinský\",\"doi\":\"10.1107/S2052252525003355\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The refinement flexibility of the Hansen–Coppens multipole model is tested on DFT calculated structure factors for the tetrakis(μ-acetato)diaquadicopper model system. The Cu scattering factor performs the best of all the options tried for most of the monitored parameters despite the Cu<sup>2+</sup> nature of the complex studied. The Hansen–Coppens model performs similarly well when comparing deviations among computational chemistry methods.</div></div><div><div>In this study, the flexibility of the multipole Hansen–Coppens (HC) model refinement is investigated on calculated structure factors from a DFT reference for the tetrakis(μ-acetato)diaquadicopper model system (CCDC reference 1811668). The effect of the resolution [sin(θ)/λ], the Cu scattering factor, the inclusion of anisotropic displacement parameters and the positions of the atoms in the refinement are considered in terms of statistical error analysis, residual and deformation density maps, Atoms In Molecules parameters, <em>d</em>-orbital populations, and others. The choice of the neutral Cu scattering factor in the HC refinement is found to give the most satisfactory results for most of the monitored parameters, despite the formal Cu<sup>2+</sup> nature of copper in the studied complex. In order to put the difference between the HC model and the reference DFT (BLYP functional) results on the right scale, several computational chemistry methods (B3LYP, Hartree–Fock, Møller–Plesset perturbation theory and Coupled Clusters Singles and Doubles) were compared with the chosen DFT reference. Differences in the magnitudes of the structure factors and AIM parameters are presented, including considerations of relativistic effects and periodic boundary conditions, <em>i.e.</em> a comparison of a molecular crystal calculation versus an isolated molecule in the crystal.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14775,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IUCrJ\",\"volume\":\"12 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 444-461\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IUCrJ\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S2052252525000417\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IUCrJ","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S2052252525000417","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
On the flexibility of the multipole model refinement. A DFT benchmark study of the tetrakis(μ-acetato)diaquadicopper model system
The refinement flexibility of the Hansen–Coppens multipole model is tested on DFT calculated structure factors for the tetrakis(μ-acetato)diaquadicopper model system. The Cu scattering factor performs the best of all the options tried for most of the monitored parameters despite the Cu2+ nature of the complex studied. The Hansen–Coppens model performs similarly well when comparing deviations among computational chemistry methods.
In this study, the flexibility of the multipole Hansen–Coppens (HC) model refinement is investigated on calculated structure factors from a DFT reference for the tetrakis(μ-acetato)diaquadicopper model system (CCDC reference 1811668). The effect of the resolution [sin(θ)/λ], the Cu scattering factor, the inclusion of anisotropic displacement parameters and the positions of the atoms in the refinement are considered in terms of statistical error analysis, residual and deformation density maps, Atoms In Molecules parameters, d-orbital populations, and others. The choice of the neutral Cu scattering factor in the HC refinement is found to give the most satisfactory results for most of the monitored parameters, despite the formal Cu2+ nature of copper in the studied complex. In order to put the difference between the HC model and the reference DFT (BLYP functional) results on the right scale, several computational chemistry methods (B3LYP, Hartree–Fock, Møller–Plesset perturbation theory and Coupled Clusters Singles and Doubles) were compared with the chosen DFT reference. Differences in the magnitudes of the structure factors and AIM parameters are presented, including considerations of relativistic effects and periodic boundary conditions, i.e. a comparison of a molecular crystal calculation versus an isolated molecule in the crystal.
期刊介绍:
IUCrJ is a new fully open-access peer-reviewed journal from the International Union of Crystallography (IUCr).
The journal will publish high-profile articles on all aspects of the sciences and technologies supported by the IUCr via its commissions, including emerging fields where structural results underpin the science reported in the article. Our aim is to make IUCrJ the natural home for high-quality structural science results. Chemists, biologists, physicists and material scientists will be actively encouraged to report their structural studies in IUCrJ.