荷兰新生儿酪氨酸血症1型筛查的性能评估:除琥珀酰丙酮外使用其他生物标志物的改进建议

IF 4 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Marelle J Bouva, Allysa M Kuypers, Evelien A Kemper, Rose E Maase, Annet M Bosch, Francjan J van Spronsen, Annemieke C Heijboer, M Rebecca Heiner-Fokkema, Sandra G Heil, Anita Boelen
{"title":"荷兰新生儿酪氨酸血症1型筛查的性能评估:除琥珀酰丙酮外使用其他生物标志物的改进建议","authors":"Marelle J Bouva, Allysa M Kuypers, Evelien A Kemper, Rose E Maase, Annet M Bosch, Francjan J van Spronsen, Annemieke C Heijboer, M Rebecca Heiner-Fokkema, Sandra G Heil, Anita Boelen","doi":"10.3390/ijns11020035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Currently, Dutch newborns are screened for tyrosinemia type 1 (TT1) using succinylacetone (SA) as the biomarker. Although the sensitivity of the test is high, a high number of false positives is observed. Here, the aim is to evaluate the current Dutch newborn-screening protocol and to assess alternatives, specifically the use of biomarkers that are already being measured, to increase the positive predictive value (PPV). TT1 screening was performed with the Revvity NeoBase assay between 2008 and 2017, and since 2018, the Revvity NeoBase 2 assay has been used. Data from 2018 to 2021 were used for evaluation. To simulate alternative screening protocols, these data were enriched with results of referrals from other periods and a false negative (FN) from 2010. In 2018-2021, 693,821 newborns were screened, resulting in 23 referrals, of whom two were TT1 patients. For this period, to date, no FN have been reported, resulting in a provisional sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 99.997%, and a PPV and negative predictive value of 9% and 100%, respectively. To improve the PPV, we combined SA, tyrosine (tyr), tyr × SA and tyr/phenylalanine and achieved a PPV of 72% for this dataset without introducing FN in the original dataset. This illustrates that future screening for TT1 may benefit from the addition of these biomarkers.</p>","PeriodicalId":14159,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Neonatal Screening","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12101382/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Performance of Newborn Screening for Tyrosinemia Type 1 in The Netherlands: Suggestions for Improvements Using Additional Biomarkers in Addition to Succinylacetone.\",\"authors\":\"Marelle J Bouva, Allysa M Kuypers, Evelien A Kemper, Rose E Maase, Annet M Bosch, Francjan J van Spronsen, Annemieke C Heijboer, M Rebecca Heiner-Fokkema, Sandra G Heil, Anita Boelen\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/ijns11020035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Currently, Dutch newborns are screened for tyrosinemia type 1 (TT1) using succinylacetone (SA) as the biomarker. Although the sensitivity of the test is high, a high number of false positives is observed. Here, the aim is to evaluate the current Dutch newborn-screening protocol and to assess alternatives, specifically the use of biomarkers that are already being measured, to increase the positive predictive value (PPV). TT1 screening was performed with the Revvity NeoBase assay between 2008 and 2017, and since 2018, the Revvity NeoBase 2 assay has been used. Data from 2018 to 2021 were used for evaluation. To simulate alternative screening protocols, these data were enriched with results of referrals from other periods and a false negative (FN) from 2010. In 2018-2021, 693,821 newborns were screened, resulting in 23 referrals, of whom two were TT1 patients. For this period, to date, no FN have been reported, resulting in a provisional sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 99.997%, and a PPV and negative predictive value of 9% and 100%, respectively. To improve the PPV, we combined SA, tyrosine (tyr), tyr × SA and tyr/phenylalanine and achieved a PPV of 72% for this dataset without introducing FN in the original dataset. This illustrates that future screening for TT1 may benefit from the addition of these biomarkers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Neonatal Screening\",\"volume\":\"11 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12101382/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Neonatal Screening\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns11020035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Neonatal Screening","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns11020035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前,荷兰新生儿使用琥珀酰丙酮(SA)作为生物标志物筛查1型酪氨酸血症(TT1)。虽然测试的灵敏度很高,但观察到大量的假阳性。在这里,目的是评估目前荷兰新生儿筛查方案,并评估替代方案,特别是使用已经测量的生物标志物,以提高阳性预测值(PPV)。在2008年至2017年期间,使用Revvity NeoBase测定法进行了TT1筛选,自2018年以来,使用了Revvity NeoBase 2测定法。使用2018年至2021年的数据进行评估。为了模拟替代筛选方案,这些数据被其他时期的转诊结果和2010年的假阴性(FN)所充实。在2018-2021年期间,对693,821名新生儿进行了筛查,导致23例转诊,其中2例为TT1患者。在此期间,到目前为止,没有FN报告,导致临时敏感性为100%,特异性为99.997%,PPV和阴性预测值分别为9%和100%。为了提高PPV,我们将SA、酪氨酸(tyr)、tyr × SA和tyr/苯丙氨酸结合在一起,在原始数据集中不引入FN的情况下,该数据集的PPV达到72%。这说明未来TT1的筛查可能受益于这些生物标志物的添加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the Performance of Newborn Screening for Tyrosinemia Type 1 in The Netherlands: Suggestions for Improvements Using Additional Biomarkers in Addition to Succinylacetone.

Currently, Dutch newborns are screened for tyrosinemia type 1 (TT1) using succinylacetone (SA) as the biomarker. Although the sensitivity of the test is high, a high number of false positives is observed. Here, the aim is to evaluate the current Dutch newborn-screening protocol and to assess alternatives, specifically the use of biomarkers that are already being measured, to increase the positive predictive value (PPV). TT1 screening was performed with the Revvity NeoBase assay between 2008 and 2017, and since 2018, the Revvity NeoBase 2 assay has been used. Data from 2018 to 2021 were used for evaluation. To simulate alternative screening protocols, these data were enriched with results of referrals from other periods and a false negative (FN) from 2010. In 2018-2021, 693,821 newborns were screened, resulting in 23 referrals, of whom two were TT1 patients. For this period, to date, no FN have been reported, resulting in a provisional sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 99.997%, and a PPV and negative predictive value of 9% and 100%, respectively. To improve the PPV, we combined SA, tyrosine (tyr), tyr × SA and tyr/phenylalanine and achieved a PPV of 72% for this dataset without introducing FN in the original dataset. This illustrates that future screening for TT1 may benefit from the addition of these biomarkers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Neonatal Screening
International Journal of Neonatal Screening Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信