开发住院患者心理健康药物评估和护理工具(IMPACT),供英国心理健康药房团队使用——一项修改的德尔菲研究。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Fatima Q Alshaikhmubarak, Richard N Keers, Petra Brown, Penny J Lewis
{"title":"开发住院患者心理健康药物评估和护理工具(IMPACT),供英国心理健康药房团队使用——一项修改的德尔菲研究。","authors":"Fatima Q Alshaikhmubarak, Richard N Keers, Petra Brown, Penny J Lewis","doi":"10.1002/bcp.70083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To develop an evidence- and consensus-based patient prioritization tool for use by UK mental health inpatient pharmacy teams.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A modified-Delphi technique was used to obtain experts' agreement on the content, design and practical use of the patient prioritization tool. Two sequential Delphi questionnaires were prepared based on published evidence concerning risk factors for drug-related problems in mental health hospitals and current prioritization practices used by UK mental health inpatient pharmacy teams. Questionnaires were discussed and agreed upon with a group of 5 stakeholders including 3 mental health pharmacy experts and 2 patient representatives. Pharmacy professionals, psychiatrists and academics were recruited through a previous study and professional networks. Agreement was achieved if ≥75 or ≥85% of the panel rated 6-7 or 5-7 in the Likert scale respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Delphi 1 questionnaire, 29 experts agreed to include 82 risk indicators in the tool and to categorize patients into 3 risk groups using a traffic light system (red = high-risk, amber = medium-risk, green = low-risk). In Delphi 2 questionnaire, 30 experts agreed on 13 statements guiding practical use of the tool and the preferred frequency of review was every 1-2 day for the high-risk group, every 2-4 days for the medium-risk group and once every working week for the low-risk group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study developed the Inpatient Mental Health Pharmaceutical Assessment and Care Tool (IMPACT) for use by UK mental health pharmacy teams. Feasibility and acceptability testing should be carried out to refine the tool and support preparations for formal evaluation of its impact on patient care and service delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing the Inpatient Mental Health Pharmaceutical Assessment and Care Tool (IMPACT) for use by UK mental health pharmacy teams-a modified Delphi study.\",\"authors\":\"Fatima Q Alshaikhmubarak, Richard N Keers, Petra Brown, Penny J Lewis\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bcp.70083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To develop an evidence- and consensus-based patient prioritization tool for use by UK mental health inpatient pharmacy teams.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A modified-Delphi technique was used to obtain experts' agreement on the content, design and practical use of the patient prioritization tool. Two sequential Delphi questionnaires were prepared based on published evidence concerning risk factors for drug-related problems in mental health hospitals and current prioritization practices used by UK mental health inpatient pharmacy teams. Questionnaires were discussed and agreed upon with a group of 5 stakeholders including 3 mental health pharmacy experts and 2 patient representatives. Pharmacy professionals, psychiatrists and academics were recruited through a previous study and professional networks. Agreement was achieved if ≥75 or ≥85% of the panel rated 6-7 or 5-7 in the Likert scale respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Delphi 1 questionnaire, 29 experts agreed to include 82 risk indicators in the tool and to categorize patients into 3 risk groups using a traffic light system (red = high-risk, amber = medium-risk, green = low-risk). In Delphi 2 questionnaire, 30 experts agreed on 13 statements guiding practical use of the tool and the preferred frequency of review was every 1-2 day for the high-risk group, every 2-4 days for the medium-risk group and once every working week for the low-risk group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study developed the Inpatient Mental Health Pharmaceutical Assessment and Care Tool (IMPACT) for use by UK mental health pharmacy teams. Feasibility and acceptability testing should be carried out to refine the tool and support preparations for formal evaluation of its impact on patient care and service delivery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of clinical pharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of clinical pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70083\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70083","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:开发一种基于证据和共识的患者优先排序工具,供英国精神卫生住院药房团队使用。方法:采用改进的德尔菲法,征求专家对患者优先排序工具的内容、设计和实际使用的一致意见。根据已发表的关于精神卫生医院药物相关问题风险因素的证据和英国精神卫生住院药房目前采用的优先排序做法,编制了两份顺序德尔菲问卷。与包括3名精神卫生药学专家和2名患者代表在内的5名利益相关者讨论并商定了问卷。通过先前的研究和专业网络招募了药学专业人员、精神科医生和学者。如果≥75%或≥85%的专家组分别在李克特量表中评分为6-7或5-7,则达成一致。结果:在德尔菲1问卷中,29位专家同意将82项风险指标纳入工具,并使用红绿灯系统将患者分为3个风险组(红色=高风险,琥珀色=中风险,绿色=低风险)。在Delphi 2问卷中,30位专家对13条指导工具实际使用的陈述达成一致意见,高危组优选每1-2天进行一次评估,中风险组优选每2-4天进行一次评估,低风险组优选每一周进行一次评估。结论:本研究开发了住院患者心理健康药物评估和护理工具(IMPACT),供英国心理健康药房团队使用。应进行可行性和可接受性测试,以完善该工具,并支持对其对患者护理和服务提供的影响进行正式评估的准备工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing the Inpatient Mental Health Pharmaceutical Assessment and Care Tool (IMPACT) for use by UK mental health pharmacy teams-a modified Delphi study.

Aims: To develop an evidence- and consensus-based patient prioritization tool for use by UK mental health inpatient pharmacy teams.

Methods: A modified-Delphi technique was used to obtain experts' agreement on the content, design and practical use of the patient prioritization tool. Two sequential Delphi questionnaires were prepared based on published evidence concerning risk factors for drug-related problems in mental health hospitals and current prioritization practices used by UK mental health inpatient pharmacy teams. Questionnaires were discussed and agreed upon with a group of 5 stakeholders including 3 mental health pharmacy experts and 2 patient representatives. Pharmacy professionals, psychiatrists and academics were recruited through a previous study and professional networks. Agreement was achieved if ≥75 or ≥85% of the panel rated 6-7 or 5-7 in the Likert scale respectively.

Results: In Delphi 1 questionnaire, 29 experts agreed to include 82 risk indicators in the tool and to categorize patients into 3 risk groups using a traffic light system (red = high-risk, amber = medium-risk, green = low-risk). In Delphi 2 questionnaire, 30 experts agreed on 13 statements guiding practical use of the tool and the preferred frequency of review was every 1-2 day for the high-risk group, every 2-4 days for the medium-risk group and once every working week for the low-risk group.

Conclusion: This study developed the Inpatient Mental Health Pharmaceutical Assessment and Care Tool (IMPACT) for use by UK mental health pharmacy teams. Feasibility and acceptability testing should be carried out to refine the tool and support preparations for formal evaluation of its impact on patient care and service delivery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
419
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the British Pharmacological Society, the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology features papers and reports on all aspects of drug action in humans: review articles, mini review articles, original papers, commentaries, editorials and letters. The Journal enjoys a wide readership, bridging the gap between the medical profession, clinical research and the pharmaceutical industry. It also publishes research on new methods, new drugs and new approaches to treatment. The Journal is recognised as one of the leading publications in its field. It is online only, publishes open access research through its OnlineOpen programme and is published monthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信