Fatima Q Alshaikhmubarak, Richard N Keers, Petra Brown, Penny J Lewis
{"title":"开发住院患者心理健康药物评估和护理工具(IMPACT),供英国心理健康药房团队使用——一项修改的德尔菲研究。","authors":"Fatima Q Alshaikhmubarak, Richard N Keers, Petra Brown, Penny J Lewis","doi":"10.1002/bcp.70083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To develop an evidence- and consensus-based patient prioritization tool for use by UK mental health inpatient pharmacy teams.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A modified-Delphi technique was used to obtain experts' agreement on the content, design and practical use of the patient prioritization tool. Two sequential Delphi questionnaires were prepared based on published evidence concerning risk factors for drug-related problems in mental health hospitals and current prioritization practices used by UK mental health inpatient pharmacy teams. Questionnaires were discussed and agreed upon with a group of 5 stakeholders including 3 mental health pharmacy experts and 2 patient representatives. Pharmacy professionals, psychiatrists and academics were recruited through a previous study and professional networks. Agreement was achieved if ≥75 or ≥85% of the panel rated 6-7 or 5-7 in the Likert scale respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Delphi 1 questionnaire, 29 experts agreed to include 82 risk indicators in the tool and to categorize patients into 3 risk groups using a traffic light system (red = high-risk, amber = medium-risk, green = low-risk). In Delphi 2 questionnaire, 30 experts agreed on 13 statements guiding practical use of the tool and the preferred frequency of review was every 1-2 day for the high-risk group, every 2-4 days for the medium-risk group and once every working week for the low-risk group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study developed the Inpatient Mental Health Pharmaceutical Assessment and Care Tool (IMPACT) for use by UK mental health pharmacy teams. Feasibility and acceptability testing should be carried out to refine the tool and support preparations for formal evaluation of its impact on patient care and service delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing the Inpatient Mental Health Pharmaceutical Assessment and Care Tool (IMPACT) for use by UK mental health pharmacy teams-a modified Delphi study.\",\"authors\":\"Fatima Q Alshaikhmubarak, Richard N Keers, Petra Brown, Penny J Lewis\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bcp.70083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To develop an evidence- and consensus-based patient prioritization tool for use by UK mental health inpatient pharmacy teams.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A modified-Delphi technique was used to obtain experts' agreement on the content, design and practical use of the patient prioritization tool. Two sequential Delphi questionnaires were prepared based on published evidence concerning risk factors for drug-related problems in mental health hospitals and current prioritization practices used by UK mental health inpatient pharmacy teams. Questionnaires were discussed and agreed upon with a group of 5 stakeholders including 3 mental health pharmacy experts and 2 patient representatives. Pharmacy professionals, psychiatrists and academics were recruited through a previous study and professional networks. Agreement was achieved if ≥75 or ≥85% of the panel rated 6-7 or 5-7 in the Likert scale respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Delphi 1 questionnaire, 29 experts agreed to include 82 risk indicators in the tool and to categorize patients into 3 risk groups using a traffic light system (red = high-risk, amber = medium-risk, green = low-risk). In Delphi 2 questionnaire, 30 experts agreed on 13 statements guiding practical use of the tool and the preferred frequency of review was every 1-2 day for the high-risk group, every 2-4 days for the medium-risk group and once every working week for the low-risk group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study developed the Inpatient Mental Health Pharmaceutical Assessment and Care Tool (IMPACT) for use by UK mental health pharmacy teams. Feasibility and acceptability testing should be carried out to refine the tool and support preparations for formal evaluation of its impact on patient care and service delivery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of clinical pharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of clinical pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70083\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70083","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Developing the Inpatient Mental Health Pharmaceutical Assessment and Care Tool (IMPACT) for use by UK mental health pharmacy teams-a modified Delphi study.
Aims: To develop an evidence- and consensus-based patient prioritization tool for use by UK mental health inpatient pharmacy teams.
Methods: A modified-Delphi technique was used to obtain experts' agreement on the content, design and practical use of the patient prioritization tool. Two sequential Delphi questionnaires were prepared based on published evidence concerning risk factors for drug-related problems in mental health hospitals and current prioritization practices used by UK mental health inpatient pharmacy teams. Questionnaires were discussed and agreed upon with a group of 5 stakeholders including 3 mental health pharmacy experts and 2 patient representatives. Pharmacy professionals, psychiatrists and academics were recruited through a previous study and professional networks. Agreement was achieved if ≥75 or ≥85% of the panel rated 6-7 or 5-7 in the Likert scale respectively.
Results: In Delphi 1 questionnaire, 29 experts agreed to include 82 risk indicators in the tool and to categorize patients into 3 risk groups using a traffic light system (red = high-risk, amber = medium-risk, green = low-risk). In Delphi 2 questionnaire, 30 experts agreed on 13 statements guiding practical use of the tool and the preferred frequency of review was every 1-2 day for the high-risk group, every 2-4 days for the medium-risk group and once every working week for the low-risk group.
Conclusion: This study developed the Inpatient Mental Health Pharmaceutical Assessment and Care Tool (IMPACT) for use by UK mental health pharmacy teams. Feasibility and acceptability testing should be carried out to refine the tool and support preparations for formal evaluation of its impact on patient care and service delivery.
期刊介绍:
Published on behalf of the British Pharmacological Society, the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology features papers and reports on all aspects of drug action in humans: review articles, mini review articles, original papers, commentaries, editorials and letters. The Journal enjoys a wide readership, bridging the gap between the medical profession, clinical research and the pharmaceutical industry. It also publishes research on new methods, new drugs and new approaches to treatment. The Journal is recognised as one of the leading publications in its field. It is online only, publishes open access research through its OnlineOpen programme and is published monthly.