QI旅程的第一步:团队从调查的角度进行改进。

IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Julie E Reed, Cassandra B Iroz, Julie K Johnson, Marjorie M Godfrey
{"title":"QI旅程的第一步:团队从调查的角度进行改进。","authors":"Julie E Reed, Cassandra B Iroz, Julie K Johnson, Marjorie M Godfrey","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surveys are widely used in healthcare to gather knowledge and information about services provided. There is a recognised gap between survey findings and their impact on practice, particularly for standardised surveys conducted at the national or organisational level. Findings are more likely to be acted on where there is a culture and infrastructure supportive of quality improvement (QI), but little is known about the experiences of local QI teams designing and using surveys in practice.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand the experiences of QI teams designing and using surveys within a national QI collaborative, including perceived value and challenges.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using an interactive research approach, 14 semistructured interviews were conducted with members of the Cystic Fibrosis Lung Transplant Transition Learning and Leadership Collaborative. Data were analysed through multiple rounds of coding and inductive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Collaborative participants viewed surveys positively as an improvement tool. The design and use of surveys was a team-based effort, embedded within the structure of the collaborative. Surveys illuminated local, microsystem and mesosystem data and provided patient and staff insights. As one step in the QI journey, surveys helped shape the direction of local QI work, resulting in positive changes in areas such as working relationships, patient interactions, staff education and work processes.Challenges experienced included: response rates and survey design, inability to act on findings, issues of sensitivity and anonymity, expertise to design surveys, time requirements, and survey fatigue.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surveys played a crucial role in driving QI efforts, leading to impactful changes in practice. Used within a supportive collaborative context, surveys became an essential tool for ongoing learning and improvement, highlighting the distinct needs of surveys used in QI compared with research.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"14 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12096982/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"One step on the QI journey: team perspectives on surveys for improvement.\",\"authors\":\"Julie E Reed, Cassandra B Iroz, Julie K Johnson, Marjorie M Godfrey\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003230\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surveys are widely used in healthcare to gather knowledge and information about services provided. There is a recognised gap between survey findings and their impact on practice, particularly for standardised surveys conducted at the national or organisational level. Findings are more likely to be acted on where there is a culture and infrastructure supportive of quality improvement (QI), but little is known about the experiences of local QI teams designing and using surveys in practice.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand the experiences of QI teams designing and using surveys within a national QI collaborative, including perceived value and challenges.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using an interactive research approach, 14 semistructured interviews were conducted with members of the Cystic Fibrosis Lung Transplant Transition Learning and Leadership Collaborative. Data were analysed through multiple rounds of coding and inductive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Collaborative participants viewed surveys positively as an improvement tool. The design and use of surveys was a team-based effort, embedded within the structure of the collaborative. Surveys illuminated local, microsystem and mesosystem data and provided patient and staff insights. As one step in the QI journey, surveys helped shape the direction of local QI work, resulting in positive changes in areas such as working relationships, patient interactions, staff education and work processes.Challenges experienced included: response rates and survey design, inability to act on findings, issues of sensitivity and anonymity, expertise to design surveys, time requirements, and survey fatigue.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surveys played a crucial role in driving QI efforts, leading to impactful changes in practice. Used within a supportive collaborative context, surveys became an essential tool for ongoing learning and improvement, highlighting the distinct needs of surveys used in QI compared with research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Quality\",\"volume\":\"14 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12096982/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Quality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003230\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:调查在医疗保健中广泛使用,以收集有关所提供服务的知识和信息。在调查结果及其对实践的影响之间存在公认的差距,特别是在国家或组织一级进行的标准化调查。在有支持质量改进(QI)的文化和基础设施的地方,调查结果更有可能被采取行动,但对当地QI团队在实践中设计和使用调查的经验知之甚少。目的:了解QI团队在国家级QI协作中设计和使用调查的经验,包括感知价值和挑战。方法:采用交互式研究方法,对囊性纤维化肺移植过渡学习和领导协作组织的成员进行了14次半结构化访谈。通过多轮编码和归纳专题分析对数据进行分析。结果:合作参与者积极地将调查视为一种改进工具。调查的设计和使用是基于团队的工作,嵌入在协作的结构中。调查阐明了局部、微系统和中观系统的数据,并提供了患者和工作人员的见解。作为改善医疗质素旅程的第一步,调查有助塑造本地改善医疗质素工作的方向,从而在工作关系、病人互动、员工教育和工作流程等方面产生积极的变化。所经历的挑战包括:回复率和调查设计、无法根据调查结果采取行动、敏感性和匿名性问题、设计调查的专业知识、时间要求和调查疲劳。结论:调查在推动QI努力方面发挥了至关重要的作用,在实践中导致了有影响的变化。在支持性协作环境中使用,调查成为持续学习和改进的重要工具,与研究相比,突出了QI中使用的调查的独特需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
One step on the QI journey: team perspectives on surveys for improvement.

Background: Surveys are widely used in healthcare to gather knowledge and information about services provided. There is a recognised gap between survey findings and their impact on practice, particularly for standardised surveys conducted at the national or organisational level. Findings are more likely to be acted on where there is a culture and infrastructure supportive of quality improvement (QI), but little is known about the experiences of local QI teams designing and using surveys in practice.

Objective: To understand the experiences of QI teams designing and using surveys within a national QI collaborative, including perceived value and challenges.

Methods: Using an interactive research approach, 14 semistructured interviews were conducted with members of the Cystic Fibrosis Lung Transplant Transition Learning and Leadership Collaborative. Data were analysed through multiple rounds of coding and inductive thematic analysis.

Results: Collaborative participants viewed surveys positively as an improvement tool. The design and use of surveys was a team-based effort, embedded within the structure of the collaborative. Surveys illuminated local, microsystem and mesosystem data and provided patient and staff insights. As one step in the QI journey, surveys helped shape the direction of local QI work, resulting in positive changes in areas such as working relationships, patient interactions, staff education and work processes.Challenges experienced included: response rates and survey design, inability to act on findings, issues of sensitivity and anonymity, expertise to design surveys, time requirements, and survey fatigue.

Conclusions: Surveys played a crucial role in driving QI efforts, leading to impactful changes in practice. Used within a supportive collaborative context, surveys became an essential tool for ongoing learning and improvement, highlighting the distinct needs of surveys used in QI compared with research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信