口服降糖药辅助治疗1型糖尿病的疗效和安全性比较:系统综述和荟萃分析

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Dong Wu, Xiaowu Wang, Qiao Liu, Xia Luo
{"title":"口服降糖药辅助治疗1型糖尿病的疗效和安全性比较:系统综述和荟萃分析","authors":"Dong Wu, Xiaowu Wang, Qiao Liu, Xia Luo","doi":"10.1111/dom.16474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral hypoglycaemic drugs (OHDs) as an adjunct to insulin therapy in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), addressing the need for optimized glycaemic control and reduced insulin dependency.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published up to October 31, 2024. Primary outcomes included changes in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and hypoglycaemia risk. Secondary endpoints assessed six efficacy and seven safety measures using meta-analysis. Treatment effects were quantified using weighted mean difference (WMD) and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup and indirect comparisons were performed to explore variations across patient demographics and drug classes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis included 51 RCTs with 8664 participants. Overall, compared with placebo, OHDs demonstrated significant reductions in HbA1c (WMD -0.32%, p < 0.001), fasting plasma glucose (WMD -0.91 mmol/L, p < 0.001), postprandial plasma glucose (WMD -2.08 mmol/L, p < 0.001), daily insulin dosage(WMD -4.88 IU/day, p < 0.001) and body weight (WMD -1.89 kg, p < 0.001), while improving the percentage time in the target glucose range of 3.9-10.0 mmol/L (WMD 6.04%, p = 0.04). However, no significant change was observed in BMI (WMD -0.18 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, p = 0.08). Compared with placebo, OHDs did not increase the risk of hypoglycaemia (RR 1.01, p = 0.08), severe hypoglycaemia (RR 0.95, p = 0.73) or nocturnal hypoglycaemia (RR 0.97, p = 0.24), but were associated with elevated risks of serious adverse events (RR 1.30, p = 0.005), discontinuation due to adverse events (RR 1.88, p < 0.001), genital tract infection (RR 3.30, p < 0.001), gastrointestinal side effects (RR 1.98, p < 0.001) and ketoacidosis (RR 3.14, p < 0.001). Indirect comparisons favoured alpha glucosidase inhibitor (AGI) over thiazolidinediones for HbA1c reduction (mean difference -0.46%, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed greater fasting glucose reduction in adults compared to children/adolescents (WMD -1.15 mmol/L vs. -0.26 mmol/L, p of group difference = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>OHDs as adjunctive therapy in T1DM significantly improve glycaemic control and reduce insulin requirements. However, their use is associated with notable safety concerns, particularly ketoacidosis and other adverse events. Clinicians must conduct thorough risk assessments and tailor treatment plans to individual patient profiles to balance efficacy and safety. Future research should focus on long-term outcomes and strategies to mitigate adverse effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":158,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative efficacy and safety of oral hypoglycaemic drugs as adjunctive therapy in the management of type 1 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Dong Wu, Xiaowu Wang, Qiao Liu, Xia Luo\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dom.16474\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral hypoglycaemic drugs (OHDs) as an adjunct to insulin therapy in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), addressing the need for optimized glycaemic control and reduced insulin dependency.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published up to October 31, 2024. Primary outcomes included changes in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and hypoglycaemia risk. Secondary endpoints assessed six efficacy and seven safety measures using meta-analysis. Treatment effects were quantified using weighted mean difference (WMD) and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup and indirect comparisons were performed to explore variations across patient demographics and drug classes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis included 51 RCTs with 8664 participants. Overall, compared with placebo, OHDs demonstrated significant reductions in HbA1c (WMD -0.32%, p < 0.001), fasting plasma glucose (WMD -0.91 mmol/L, p < 0.001), postprandial plasma glucose (WMD -2.08 mmol/L, p < 0.001), daily insulin dosage(WMD -4.88 IU/day, p < 0.001) and body weight (WMD -1.89 kg, p < 0.001), while improving the percentage time in the target glucose range of 3.9-10.0 mmol/L (WMD 6.04%, p = 0.04). However, no significant change was observed in BMI (WMD -0.18 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, p = 0.08). Compared with placebo, OHDs did not increase the risk of hypoglycaemia (RR 1.01, p = 0.08), severe hypoglycaemia (RR 0.95, p = 0.73) or nocturnal hypoglycaemia (RR 0.97, p = 0.24), but were associated with elevated risks of serious adverse events (RR 1.30, p = 0.005), discontinuation due to adverse events (RR 1.88, p < 0.001), genital tract infection (RR 3.30, p < 0.001), gastrointestinal side effects (RR 1.98, p < 0.001) and ketoacidosis (RR 3.14, p < 0.001). Indirect comparisons favoured alpha glucosidase inhibitor (AGI) over thiazolidinediones for HbA1c reduction (mean difference -0.46%, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed greater fasting glucose reduction in adults compared to children/adolescents (WMD -1.15 mmol/L vs. -0.26 mmol/L, p of group difference = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>OHDs as adjunctive therapy in T1DM significantly improve glycaemic control and reduce insulin requirements. However, their use is associated with notable safety concerns, particularly ketoacidosis and other adverse events. Clinicians must conduct thorough risk assessments and tailor treatment plans to individual patient profiles to balance efficacy and safety. Future research should focus on long-term outcomes and strategies to mitigate adverse effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.16474\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.16474","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价口服降糖药(OHDs)辅助胰岛素治疗1型糖尿病(T1DM)患者的有效性和安全性,解决优化血糖控制和减少胰岛素依赖的需要。材料和方法:对PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆进行了系统的文献检索,以确定截至2024年10月31日发表的随机临床试验(rct)。主要结局包括糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)和低血糖风险的变化。次要终点采用荟萃分析评估了6项疗效和7项安全性措施。采用加权平均差(WMD)和95%置信区间(ci)的风险比(rr)量化治疗效果。进行亚组和间接比较以探索患者人口统计学和药物类别之间的差异。结果:meta分析纳入51项随机对照试验,共8664名受试者。总体而言,与安慰剂相比,OHDs显示HbA1c显著降低(WMD -0.32%, p 2, p = 0.08)。与安慰剂相比,OHDs没有增加低血糖(RR 1.01, p = 0.08)、严重低血糖(RR 0.95, p = 0.73)或夜间低血糖(RR 0.97, p = 0.24)的风险,但与严重不良事件(RR 1.30, p = 0.005)、因不良事件而停药(RR 1.88, p)的风险升高相关。结论:OHDs作为T1DM的辅助治疗可显著改善血糖控制,降低胰岛素需求。然而,它们的使用与明显的安全性问题有关,特别是酮症酸中毒和其他不良事件。临床医生必须进行彻底的风险评估,并根据个别患者的情况量身定制治疗计划,以平衡疗效和安全性。未来的研究应侧重于长期结果和减轻不良影响的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative efficacy and safety of oral hypoglycaemic drugs as adjunctive therapy in the management of type 1 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Aims: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral hypoglycaemic drugs (OHDs) as an adjunct to insulin therapy in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), addressing the need for optimized glycaemic control and reduced insulin dependency.

Materials and methods: A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published up to October 31, 2024. Primary outcomes included changes in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and hypoglycaemia risk. Secondary endpoints assessed six efficacy and seven safety measures using meta-analysis. Treatment effects were quantified using weighted mean difference (WMD) and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup and indirect comparisons were performed to explore variations across patient demographics and drug classes.

Results: The meta-analysis included 51 RCTs with 8664 participants. Overall, compared with placebo, OHDs demonstrated significant reductions in HbA1c (WMD -0.32%, p < 0.001), fasting plasma glucose (WMD -0.91 mmol/L, p < 0.001), postprandial plasma glucose (WMD -2.08 mmol/L, p < 0.001), daily insulin dosage(WMD -4.88 IU/day, p < 0.001) and body weight (WMD -1.89 kg, p < 0.001), while improving the percentage time in the target glucose range of 3.9-10.0 mmol/L (WMD 6.04%, p = 0.04). However, no significant change was observed in BMI (WMD -0.18 kg/m2, p = 0.08). Compared with placebo, OHDs did not increase the risk of hypoglycaemia (RR 1.01, p = 0.08), severe hypoglycaemia (RR 0.95, p = 0.73) or nocturnal hypoglycaemia (RR 0.97, p = 0.24), but were associated with elevated risks of serious adverse events (RR 1.30, p = 0.005), discontinuation due to adverse events (RR 1.88, p < 0.001), genital tract infection (RR 3.30, p < 0.001), gastrointestinal side effects (RR 1.98, p < 0.001) and ketoacidosis (RR 3.14, p < 0.001). Indirect comparisons favoured alpha glucosidase inhibitor (AGI) over thiazolidinediones for HbA1c reduction (mean difference -0.46%, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed greater fasting glucose reduction in adults compared to children/adolescents (WMD -1.15 mmol/L vs. -0.26 mmol/L, p of group difference = 0.02).

Conclusions: OHDs as adjunctive therapy in T1DM significantly improve glycaemic control and reduce insulin requirements. However, their use is associated with notable safety concerns, particularly ketoacidosis and other adverse events. Clinicians must conduct thorough risk assessments and tailor treatment plans to individual patient profiles to balance efficacy and safety. Future research should focus on long-term outcomes and strategies to mitigate adverse effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
319
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism is primarily a journal of clinical and experimental pharmacology and therapeutics covering the interrelated areas of diabetes, obesity and metabolism. The journal prioritises high-quality original research that reports on the effects of new or existing therapies, including dietary, exercise and lifestyle (non-pharmacological) interventions, in any aspect of metabolic and endocrine disease, either in humans or animal and cellular systems. ‘Metabolism’ may relate to lipids, bone and drug metabolism, or broader aspects of endocrine dysfunction. Preclinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetic studies, meta-analyses and those addressing drug safety and tolerability are also highly suitable for publication in this journal. Original research may be published as a main paper or as a research letter.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信