带止血带或不带止血带的全膝关节置换术后再手术率和无菌性松动无差异

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Aaron Gazendam, Hassaan Abdel Khalik, Mansi Patel, Seper Ekhtiari, Isabelle Tate, Thomas J Wood
{"title":"带止血带或不带止血带的全膝关节置换术后再手术率和无菌性松动无差异","authors":"Aaron Gazendam,&nbsp;Hassaan Abdel Khalik,&nbsp;Mansi Patel,&nbsp;Seper Ekhtiari,&nbsp;Isabelle Tate,&nbsp;Thomas J Wood","doi":"10.1007/s00402-025-05933-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The objective of the current study was to evaluate the reoperation rate among patients undergoing cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with or without an intraoperative tourniquet.</p><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>A retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who received a primary, cemented TKA at a high volume academic orthopaedic center. Eligible patients underwent primary, cemented TKA either with or without the use of a tourniquet throughout the entirety of the care. The causes and timing of reoperations were recorded. Survivorship analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox proportional hazards models were utilized to evaluate independent predictors of reoperation.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>There were 2276 (58%) cases in which a tourniquet was used and 1663 (42%) cases with no tourniquet use. Mean time from the primary TKA was 14.7 years. The cumulative survival at final follow-up for the no tourniquet group and tourniquet group were 92.2% and 96.5%, respectively. Only younger age was an independent predictor of both all cause revision and aseptic loosening.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Adjusting for confounders, the presence of a tourniquet did not affect the rates of long-term all-cause revision rates or aseptic loosening. Younger patients have a higher risk of all-cause reoperation and reoperation due to aseptic loosening.</p><h3>Level of evidence</h3><p>Level III.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No difference in reoperation rates or aseptic loosening following cemented total knee arthroplasty with or without a tourniquet\",\"authors\":\"Aaron Gazendam,&nbsp;Hassaan Abdel Khalik,&nbsp;Mansi Patel,&nbsp;Seper Ekhtiari,&nbsp;Isabelle Tate,&nbsp;Thomas J Wood\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00402-025-05933-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The objective of the current study was to evaluate the reoperation rate among patients undergoing cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with or without an intraoperative tourniquet.</p><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>A retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who received a primary, cemented TKA at a high volume academic orthopaedic center. Eligible patients underwent primary, cemented TKA either with or without the use of a tourniquet throughout the entirety of the care. The causes and timing of reoperations were recorded. Survivorship analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox proportional hazards models were utilized to evaluate independent predictors of reoperation.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>There were 2276 (58%) cases in which a tourniquet was used and 1663 (42%) cases with no tourniquet use. Mean time from the primary TKA was 14.7 years. The cumulative survival at final follow-up for the no tourniquet group and tourniquet group were 92.2% and 96.5%, respectively. Only younger age was an independent predictor of both all cause revision and aseptic loosening.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Adjusting for confounders, the presence of a tourniquet did not affect the rates of long-term all-cause revision rates or aseptic loosening. Younger patients have a higher risk of all-cause reoperation and reoperation due to aseptic loosening.</p><h3>Level of evidence</h3><p>Level III.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery\",\"volume\":\"145 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-025-05933-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-025-05933-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是评估术中带止血带或不带止血带的骨水泥全膝关节置换术(TKA)患者的再手术率。材料和方法一项回顾性队列研究,在一个大容量学术骨科中心连续接受原发性骨水泥TKA的患者。符合条件的患者在整个治疗过程中使用止血带或不使用止血带进行原发性骨水泥TKA。记录再操作的原因和时间。生存率分析采用Kaplan-Meier曲线。采用Cox比例风险模型评价再手术的独立预测因素。结果使用止血带2276例(58%),未使用止血带1663例(42%)。原发性TKA的平均时间为14.7年。无止血带组和止血带组的最终随访累积生存率分别为92.2%和96.5%。只有年轻是全因修正和无菌性松动的独立预测因子。结论:调整混杂因素后,止血带的存在不影响长期全因翻修率或无菌松动率。年轻患者因无菌性松动发生全因再手术和再手术的风险较高。证据等级:III级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
No difference in reoperation rates or aseptic loosening following cemented total knee arthroplasty with or without a tourniquet

Introduction

The objective of the current study was to evaluate the reoperation rate among patients undergoing cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with or without an intraoperative tourniquet.

Materials and methods

A retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who received a primary, cemented TKA at a high volume academic orthopaedic center. Eligible patients underwent primary, cemented TKA either with or without the use of a tourniquet throughout the entirety of the care. The causes and timing of reoperations were recorded. Survivorship analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox proportional hazards models were utilized to evaluate independent predictors of reoperation.

Results

There were 2276 (58%) cases in which a tourniquet was used and 1663 (42%) cases with no tourniquet use. Mean time from the primary TKA was 14.7 years. The cumulative survival at final follow-up for the no tourniquet group and tourniquet group were 92.2% and 96.5%, respectively. Only younger age was an independent predictor of both all cause revision and aseptic loosening.

Conclusions

Adjusting for confounders, the presence of a tourniquet did not affect the rates of long-term all-cause revision rates or aseptic loosening. Younger patients have a higher risk of all-cause reoperation and reoperation due to aseptic loosening.

Level of evidence

Level III.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
424
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is a rich source of instruction and information for physicians in clinical practice and research in the extensive field of orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal publishes papers that deal with diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system from all fields and aspects of medicine. The journal is particularly interested in papers that satisfy the information needs of orthopaedic clinicians and practitioners. The journal places special emphasis on clinical relevance. "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is the official journal of the German Speaking Arthroscopy Association (AGA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信