{"title":"带止血带或不带止血带的全膝关节置换术后再手术率和无菌性松动无差异","authors":"Aaron Gazendam, Hassaan Abdel Khalik, Mansi Patel, Seper Ekhtiari, Isabelle Tate, Thomas J Wood","doi":"10.1007/s00402-025-05933-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The objective of the current study was to evaluate the reoperation rate among patients undergoing cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with or without an intraoperative tourniquet.</p><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>A retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who received a primary, cemented TKA at a high volume academic orthopaedic center. Eligible patients underwent primary, cemented TKA either with or without the use of a tourniquet throughout the entirety of the care. The causes and timing of reoperations were recorded. Survivorship analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox proportional hazards models were utilized to evaluate independent predictors of reoperation.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>There were 2276 (58%) cases in which a tourniquet was used and 1663 (42%) cases with no tourniquet use. Mean time from the primary TKA was 14.7 years. The cumulative survival at final follow-up for the no tourniquet group and tourniquet group were 92.2% and 96.5%, respectively. Only younger age was an independent predictor of both all cause revision and aseptic loosening.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Adjusting for confounders, the presence of a tourniquet did not affect the rates of long-term all-cause revision rates or aseptic loosening. Younger patients have a higher risk of all-cause reoperation and reoperation due to aseptic loosening.</p><h3>Level of evidence</h3><p>Level III.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No difference in reoperation rates or aseptic loosening following cemented total knee arthroplasty with or without a tourniquet\",\"authors\":\"Aaron Gazendam, Hassaan Abdel Khalik, Mansi Patel, Seper Ekhtiari, Isabelle Tate, Thomas J Wood\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00402-025-05933-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The objective of the current study was to evaluate the reoperation rate among patients undergoing cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with or without an intraoperative tourniquet.</p><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>A retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who received a primary, cemented TKA at a high volume academic orthopaedic center. Eligible patients underwent primary, cemented TKA either with or without the use of a tourniquet throughout the entirety of the care. The causes and timing of reoperations were recorded. Survivorship analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox proportional hazards models were utilized to evaluate independent predictors of reoperation.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>There were 2276 (58%) cases in which a tourniquet was used and 1663 (42%) cases with no tourniquet use. Mean time from the primary TKA was 14.7 years. The cumulative survival at final follow-up for the no tourniquet group and tourniquet group were 92.2% and 96.5%, respectively. Only younger age was an independent predictor of both all cause revision and aseptic loosening.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Adjusting for confounders, the presence of a tourniquet did not affect the rates of long-term all-cause revision rates or aseptic loosening. Younger patients have a higher risk of all-cause reoperation and reoperation due to aseptic loosening.</p><h3>Level of evidence</h3><p>Level III.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery\",\"volume\":\"145 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-025-05933-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-025-05933-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
No difference in reoperation rates or aseptic loosening following cemented total knee arthroplasty with or without a tourniquet
Introduction
The objective of the current study was to evaluate the reoperation rate among patients undergoing cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with or without an intraoperative tourniquet.
Materials and methods
A retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who received a primary, cemented TKA at a high volume academic orthopaedic center. Eligible patients underwent primary, cemented TKA either with or without the use of a tourniquet throughout the entirety of the care. The causes and timing of reoperations were recorded. Survivorship analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox proportional hazards models were utilized to evaluate independent predictors of reoperation.
Results
There were 2276 (58%) cases in which a tourniquet was used and 1663 (42%) cases with no tourniquet use. Mean time from the primary TKA was 14.7 years. The cumulative survival at final follow-up for the no tourniquet group and tourniquet group were 92.2% and 96.5%, respectively. Only younger age was an independent predictor of both all cause revision and aseptic loosening.
Conclusions
Adjusting for confounders, the presence of a tourniquet did not affect the rates of long-term all-cause revision rates or aseptic loosening. Younger patients have a higher risk of all-cause reoperation and reoperation due to aseptic loosening.
期刊介绍:
"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is a rich source of instruction and information for physicians in clinical practice and research in the extensive field of orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal publishes papers that deal with diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system from all fields and aspects of medicine. The journal is particularly interested in papers that satisfy the information needs of orthopaedic clinicians and practitioners. The journal places special emphasis on clinical relevance.
"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is the official journal of the German Speaking Arthroscopy Association (AGA).