供应链金融与软预算约束:基于中国上市公司的非线性门槛效应视角

IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Rui Chen , Qiqing Huang
{"title":"供应链金融与软预算约束:基于中国上市公司的非线性门槛效应视角","authors":"Rui Chen ,&nbsp;Qiqing Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.frl.2025.107560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This research examines how supply chain finance (SCF) affects financial distress through textual analysis, focusing on budgetary soft constraints. The study finds that listed companies engaging in SCF significantly reduce their financial distress risk. The mechanism test shows that SCF primarily eases financial distress by reducing strategic burdens and improving budgetary soft constraints rather than by addressing social burdens. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that SCF’s positive impact on budgetary soft constraints is pronounced in companies with formal contracts (state-owned enterprises), but it does not mitigate the negative effects of political connections (informal contracts). Additionally, SCF has a positive effect on firms with less efficient investment and financing activities. Findings offer empirical insights into improving corporate budgetary soft constraints, optimizing the investment and financing environment, and achieving sustainable development goals, helping enterprises make informed decisions on SCF to address financial difficulties.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12167,"journal":{"name":"Finance Research Letters","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 107560"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supply chain finance and soft budget constraints: A nonlinear threshold effect perspective from China's listed companies\",\"authors\":\"Rui Chen ,&nbsp;Qiqing Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.frl.2025.107560\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This research examines how supply chain finance (SCF) affects financial distress through textual analysis, focusing on budgetary soft constraints. The study finds that listed companies engaging in SCF significantly reduce their financial distress risk. The mechanism test shows that SCF primarily eases financial distress by reducing strategic burdens and improving budgetary soft constraints rather than by addressing social burdens. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that SCF’s positive impact on budgetary soft constraints is pronounced in companies with formal contracts (state-owned enterprises), but it does not mitigate the negative effects of political connections (informal contracts). Additionally, SCF has a positive effect on firms with less efficient investment and financing activities. Findings offer empirical insights into improving corporate budgetary soft constraints, optimizing the investment and financing environment, and achieving sustainable development goals, helping enterprises make informed decisions on SCF to address financial difficulties.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Finance Research Letters\",\"volume\":\"82 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107560\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Finance Research Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612325008190\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Finance Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612325008190","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究通过文本分析探讨供应链金融(SCF)如何影响财务困境,重点关注预算软约束。研究发现,参与SCF的上市公司财务困境风险显著降低。机制检验表明,供应链融资主要通过减轻战略负担和改善预算软约束来缓解财务困境,而不是通过解决社会负担。异质性分析表明,在有正式合同的企业(国有企业)中,供应链融资对预算软约束的正向影响显著,但没有缓解政治关系(非正式合同)的负面影响。此外,SCF对投资和融资活动效率较低的企业具有积极影响。研究结果为改善企业预算软约束、优化投融资环境、实现可持续发展目标提供了实证见解,有助于企业做出明智的供应链融资决策,解决融资困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Supply chain finance and soft budget constraints: A nonlinear threshold effect perspective from China's listed companies
This research examines how supply chain finance (SCF) affects financial distress through textual analysis, focusing on budgetary soft constraints. The study finds that listed companies engaging in SCF significantly reduce their financial distress risk. The mechanism test shows that SCF primarily eases financial distress by reducing strategic burdens and improving budgetary soft constraints rather than by addressing social burdens. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that SCF’s positive impact on budgetary soft constraints is pronounced in companies with formal contracts (state-owned enterprises), but it does not mitigate the negative effects of political connections (informal contracts). Additionally, SCF has a positive effect on firms with less efficient investment and financing activities. Findings offer empirical insights into improving corporate budgetary soft constraints, optimizing the investment and financing environment, and achieving sustainable development goals, helping enterprises make informed decisions on SCF to address financial difficulties.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Finance Research Letters
Finance Research Letters BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
14.40%
发文量
863
期刊介绍: Finance Research Letters welcomes submissions across all areas of finance, aiming for rapid publication of significant new findings. The journal particularly encourages papers that provide insight into the replicability of established results, examine the cross-national applicability of previous findings, challenge existing methodologies, or demonstrate methodological contingencies. Papers are invited in the following areas: Actuarial studies Alternative investments Asset Pricing Bankruptcy and liquidation Banks and other Depository Institutions Behavioral and experimental finance Bibliometric and Scientometric studies of finance Capital budgeting and corporate investment Capital markets and accounting Capital structure and payout policy Commodities Contagion, crises and interdependence Corporate governance Credit and fixed income markets and instruments Derivatives Emerging markets Energy Finance and Energy Markets Financial Econometrics Financial History Financial intermediation and money markets Financial markets and marketplaces Financial Mathematics and Econophysics Financial Regulation and Law Forecasting Frontier market studies International Finance Market efficiency, event studies Mergers, acquisitions and the market for corporate control Micro Finance Institutions Microstructure Non-bank Financial Institutions Personal Finance Portfolio choice and investing Real estate finance and investing Risk SME, Family and Entrepreneurial Finance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信