Daniel F. Polan PhD , Justin K. Mikell PhD , Kellen Fitzpatrick MS , Joseph J. Gemmete MD , Jared A. Christensen MD , Hassan Anbari MD , Molly Roseland MD , Joseph R. Evans MD, PhD , Daniel T. Chang MD , Mamadou Sanogo MD , Baljendra S. Kapoor MD , Matthew J. Schipper PhD , Yue Cao PhD , Madhava P. Aryal , Theodore S. Lawrence MD, PhD , Kyle C. Cuneo MD , Yuni K. Dewaraja PhD
{"title":"序贯90Y选择性内放射治疗(SIRT)和基于90Y pet吸收剂量图的立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT):一项1期研究的中期分析","authors":"Daniel F. Polan PhD , Justin K. Mikell PhD , Kellen Fitzpatrick MS , Joseph J. Gemmete MD , Jared A. Christensen MD , Hassan Anbari MD , Molly Roseland MD , Joseph R. Evans MD, PhD , Daniel T. Chang MD , Mamadou Sanogo MD , Baljendra S. Kapoor MD , Matthew J. Schipper PhD , Yue Cao PhD , Madhava P. Aryal , Theodore S. Lawrence MD, PhD , Kyle C. Cuneo MD , Yuni K. Dewaraja PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2025.101743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) can result in heterogeneous absorbed dose coverage. To address potential underdosing of lesions with SIRT, we designed a phase 1 clinical trial (NCT04518748) to add stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) 6 weeks after <sup>90</sup>Y SIRT.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><div>In this ongoing, single-center prospective trial, patients received standard-of-care <sup>90</sup>Y SIRT with glass microspheres for the treatment of unresectable primary or secondary liver cancer. Post-SIRT dosimetry was performed using <sup>90</sup>Y positron emission tomography/computed tomography to calculate mean lesion absorbed doses. Lesions were considered eligible for SBRT treatment if the mean absorbed dose was <290 Gy. In the presence of dose heterogeneity, SBRT gross tumor volumes were optionally limited to subvolumes based on a SIRT dose threshold determined from prior modeling. Interim analysis was prespecified after 10 participants received both SIRT and SBRT and completed 6-month follow-up with the primary endpoint of an increase in Child-Pugh score of ≥2.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 24 patients who received SIRT as part of the trial, 15 had lesions that were considered dosimetrically eligible for SBRT based on the criteria of 290 Gy mean absorbed dose from <sup>90</sup>Y. Of those, 10 patients received SBRT with prescription doses between 30 and 50 Gy. Only 1 patient had a Child-Pugh increase of ≥2 at 6 months following SBRT, and only 1 grade 3 nonlaboratory toxicity was reported after SBRT.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Interim analysis found that liver toxicity from <sup>90</sup>Y SIRT followed by SBRT was below the early stopping threshold, and continuation of the study to complete recruitment of 30 evaluable patients was recommended.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"10 7","pages":"Article 101743"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sequential 90Y Selective Internal Radiation Therapy (SIRT) and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) using 90Y PET-based Absorbed Dose Maps: Interim Analysis of a Phase 1 Study\",\"authors\":\"Daniel F. Polan PhD , Justin K. Mikell PhD , Kellen Fitzpatrick MS , Joseph J. Gemmete MD , Jared A. Christensen MD , Hassan Anbari MD , Molly Roseland MD , Joseph R. Evans MD, PhD , Daniel T. Chang MD , Mamadou Sanogo MD , Baljendra S. Kapoor MD , Matthew J. Schipper PhD , Yue Cao PhD , Madhava P. Aryal , Theodore S. Lawrence MD, PhD , Kyle C. Cuneo MD , Yuni K. Dewaraja PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.adro.2025.101743\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) can result in heterogeneous absorbed dose coverage. To address potential underdosing of lesions with SIRT, we designed a phase 1 clinical trial (NCT04518748) to add stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) 6 weeks after <sup>90</sup>Y SIRT.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><div>In this ongoing, single-center prospective trial, patients received standard-of-care <sup>90</sup>Y SIRT with glass microspheres for the treatment of unresectable primary or secondary liver cancer. Post-SIRT dosimetry was performed using <sup>90</sup>Y positron emission tomography/computed tomography to calculate mean lesion absorbed doses. Lesions were considered eligible for SBRT treatment if the mean absorbed dose was <290 Gy. In the presence of dose heterogeneity, SBRT gross tumor volumes were optionally limited to subvolumes based on a SIRT dose threshold determined from prior modeling. Interim analysis was prespecified after 10 participants received both SIRT and SBRT and completed 6-month follow-up with the primary endpoint of an increase in Child-Pugh score of ≥2.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 24 patients who received SIRT as part of the trial, 15 had lesions that were considered dosimetrically eligible for SBRT based on the criteria of 290 Gy mean absorbed dose from <sup>90</sup>Y. Of those, 10 patients received SBRT with prescription doses between 30 and 50 Gy. Only 1 patient had a Child-Pugh increase of ≥2 at 6 months following SBRT, and only 1 grade 3 nonlaboratory toxicity was reported after SBRT.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Interim analysis found that liver toxicity from <sup>90</sup>Y SIRT followed by SBRT was below the early stopping threshold, and continuation of the study to complete recruitment of 30 evaluable patients was recommended.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"10 7\",\"pages\":\"Article 101743\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109425000314\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109425000314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sequential 90Y Selective Internal Radiation Therapy (SIRT) and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) using 90Y PET-based Absorbed Dose Maps: Interim Analysis of a Phase 1 Study
Purpose
Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) can result in heterogeneous absorbed dose coverage. To address potential underdosing of lesions with SIRT, we designed a phase 1 clinical trial (NCT04518748) to add stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) 6 weeks after 90Y SIRT.
Methods and Materials
In this ongoing, single-center prospective trial, patients received standard-of-care 90Y SIRT with glass microspheres for the treatment of unresectable primary or secondary liver cancer. Post-SIRT dosimetry was performed using 90Y positron emission tomography/computed tomography to calculate mean lesion absorbed doses. Lesions were considered eligible for SBRT treatment if the mean absorbed dose was <290 Gy. In the presence of dose heterogeneity, SBRT gross tumor volumes were optionally limited to subvolumes based on a SIRT dose threshold determined from prior modeling. Interim analysis was prespecified after 10 participants received both SIRT and SBRT and completed 6-month follow-up with the primary endpoint of an increase in Child-Pugh score of ≥2.
Results
Of the 24 patients who received SIRT as part of the trial, 15 had lesions that were considered dosimetrically eligible for SBRT based on the criteria of 290 Gy mean absorbed dose from 90Y. Of those, 10 patients received SBRT with prescription doses between 30 and 50 Gy. Only 1 patient had a Child-Pugh increase of ≥2 at 6 months following SBRT, and only 1 grade 3 nonlaboratory toxicity was reported after SBRT.
Conclusions
Interim analysis found that liver toxicity from 90Y SIRT followed by SBRT was below the early stopping threshold, and continuation of the study to complete recruitment of 30 evaluable patients was recommended.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of Advances is to provide information for clinicians who use radiation therapy by publishing: Clinical trial reports and reanalyses. Basic science original reports. Manuscripts examining health services research, comparative and cost effectiveness research, and systematic reviews. Case reports documenting unusual problems and solutions. High quality multi and single institutional series, as well as other novel retrospective hypothesis generating series. Timely critical reviews on important topics in radiation oncology, such as side effects. Articles reporting the natural history of disease and patterns of failure, particularly as they relate to treatment volume delineation. Articles on safety and quality in radiation therapy. Essays on clinical experience. Articles on practice transformation in radiation oncology, in particular: Aspects of health policy that may impact the future practice of radiation oncology. How information technology, such as data analytics and systems innovations, will change radiation oncology practice. Articles on imaging as they relate to radiation therapy treatment.