{"title":"2001年至2019年不同的全球土地变化情景","authors":"Siqi Peng , Xiao Zhang , Liangyun Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Global land use and land cover (LULC) change plays a critical role in environmental change, biodiversity conservation, climate regulation, and ecosystem services. Over the past few decades, multiple global LULC datasets—such as MCD12Q1, ESA CCI-LC, GLC-FCS30D, HYDE 3.3, HILDA+ , and LUH2—have been developed using remote sensing or historical reconstruction. In this study, we comprehensively analyse the similarities and discrepancies among six global LULC datasets, revealing land-cover changes and transitions from 2001 to 2019. The most significant global LULC changes during this period include forest loss, cropland gain, and settlement expansion. The mutual conversion between forest and cropland was particularly prominent, accounting for around 20 % of all land-use transitions. However, notable discrepancies exist among the datasets in capturing global LULC changes. For example, estimates of net forest area change vary from an increase of <span><math><mrow><mn>1</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>10</mn><mo>×</mo><msup><mrow><mn>10</mn></mrow><mn>5</mn></msup><msup><mrow><mi>km</mi></mrow><mn>2</mn></msup></mrow></math></span> to a decrease of <span><math><mrow><mn>1</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>55</mn><mo>×</mo><msup><mrow><mn>10</mn></mrow><mn>6</mn></msup><msup><mrow><mi>km</mi></mrow><mn>2</mn></msup></mrow></math></span>, while cropland area changes vary from a rise of <span><math><mrow><mn>1</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>59</mn><mo>×</mo><msup><mrow><mn>10</mn></mrow><mn>6</mn></msup><msup><mrow><mtext>km</mtext></mrow><mn>2</mn></msup></mrow></math></span> to a decline of <span><math><mrow><mn>4</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>11</mn><mo>×</mo><msup><mrow><mn>10</mn></mrow><mn>4</mn></msup><msup><mrow><mtext>km</mtext></mrow><mn>2</mn></msup></mrow></math></span>. Settlement areas saw the most significant increase in the GLC-FCS30D dataset. These differences were most pronounced in Africa and South America for forest loss and cropland gain, and in Asia for settlement expansion. Comparisons with FAOSTAT show that GLC-FCS30D and HYDE 3.3 align closely with cropland changes, while HILDA+ closely matches forest change data. These findings highlight the importance of harmonizing LULC datasets to improve the accuracy of global land change assessments and support better environmental management strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17933,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Policy","volume":"156 ","pages":"Article 107605"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Divergent global land change scenarios from 2001 to 2019\",\"authors\":\"Siqi Peng , Xiao Zhang , Liangyun Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107605\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Global land use and land cover (LULC) change plays a critical role in environmental change, biodiversity conservation, climate regulation, and ecosystem services. Over the past few decades, multiple global LULC datasets—such as MCD12Q1, ESA CCI-LC, GLC-FCS30D, HYDE 3.3, HILDA+ , and LUH2—have been developed using remote sensing or historical reconstruction. In this study, we comprehensively analyse the similarities and discrepancies among six global LULC datasets, revealing land-cover changes and transitions from 2001 to 2019. The most significant global LULC changes during this period include forest loss, cropland gain, and settlement expansion. The mutual conversion between forest and cropland was particularly prominent, accounting for around 20 % of all land-use transitions. However, notable discrepancies exist among the datasets in capturing global LULC changes. For example, estimates of net forest area change vary from an increase of <span><math><mrow><mn>1</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>10</mn><mo>×</mo><msup><mrow><mn>10</mn></mrow><mn>5</mn></msup><msup><mrow><mi>km</mi></mrow><mn>2</mn></msup></mrow></math></span> to a decrease of <span><math><mrow><mn>1</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>55</mn><mo>×</mo><msup><mrow><mn>10</mn></mrow><mn>6</mn></msup><msup><mrow><mi>km</mi></mrow><mn>2</mn></msup></mrow></math></span>, while cropland area changes vary from a rise of <span><math><mrow><mn>1</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>59</mn><mo>×</mo><msup><mrow><mn>10</mn></mrow><mn>6</mn></msup><msup><mrow><mtext>km</mtext></mrow><mn>2</mn></msup></mrow></math></span> to a decline of <span><math><mrow><mn>4</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>11</mn><mo>×</mo><msup><mrow><mn>10</mn></mrow><mn>4</mn></msup><msup><mrow><mtext>km</mtext></mrow><mn>2</mn></msup></mrow></math></span>. Settlement areas saw the most significant increase in the GLC-FCS30D dataset. These differences were most pronounced in Africa and South America for forest loss and cropland gain, and in Asia for settlement expansion. Comparisons with FAOSTAT show that GLC-FCS30D and HYDE 3.3 align closely with cropland changes, while HILDA+ closely matches forest change data. These findings highlight the importance of harmonizing LULC datasets to improve the accuracy of global land change assessments and support better environmental management strategies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17933,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Land Use Policy\",\"volume\":\"156 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107605\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Land Use Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837725001395\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Use Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837725001395","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Divergent global land change scenarios from 2001 to 2019
Global land use and land cover (LULC) change plays a critical role in environmental change, biodiversity conservation, climate regulation, and ecosystem services. Over the past few decades, multiple global LULC datasets—such as MCD12Q1, ESA CCI-LC, GLC-FCS30D, HYDE 3.3, HILDA+ , and LUH2—have been developed using remote sensing or historical reconstruction. In this study, we comprehensively analyse the similarities and discrepancies among six global LULC datasets, revealing land-cover changes and transitions from 2001 to 2019. The most significant global LULC changes during this period include forest loss, cropland gain, and settlement expansion. The mutual conversion between forest and cropland was particularly prominent, accounting for around 20 % of all land-use transitions. However, notable discrepancies exist among the datasets in capturing global LULC changes. For example, estimates of net forest area change vary from an increase of to a decrease of , while cropland area changes vary from a rise of to a decline of . Settlement areas saw the most significant increase in the GLC-FCS30D dataset. These differences were most pronounced in Africa and South America for forest loss and cropland gain, and in Asia for settlement expansion. Comparisons with FAOSTAT show that GLC-FCS30D and HYDE 3.3 align closely with cropland changes, while HILDA+ closely matches forest change data. These findings highlight the importance of harmonizing LULC datasets to improve the accuracy of global land change assessments and support better environmental management strategies.
期刊介绍:
Land Use Policy is an international and interdisciplinary journal concerned with the social, economic, political, legal, physical and planning aspects of urban and rural land use.
Land Use Policy examines issues in geography, agriculture, forestry, irrigation, environmental conservation, housing, urban development and transport in both developed and developing countries through major refereed articles and shorter viewpoint pieces.