副鼻窦偶发瘤的计算机断层成像:频率和特征。

Marta M Williams, Samantha M Shave, Margaret B Mitchell, Ryan A Bartholomew, Neil Bhattacharyya
{"title":"副鼻窦偶发瘤的计算机断层成像:频率和特征。","authors":"Marta M Williams, Samantha M Shave, Margaret B Mitchell, Ryan A Bartholomew, Neil Bhattacharyya","doi":"10.1177/00034894251339894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>As patient access to radiology reports increases, incidental findings can be a significant source of stress and an increasing burden for clinicians to address. This study analyzes the frequency and characteristics of incidental findings on paranasal sinus computed tomography (CT) scans.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of a random sample of radiology reports for paranasal sinus CT scans in a metropolitan healthcare system in 2021 was conducted. Incidental findings were defined as unexpected findings which an otolaryngologist would not typically manage or would evaluate using different diagnostic modalities. Incidental findings were categorized based on anatomic location and etiology. Associations between incidental findings with age and sex were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1000 scans, 385 (38.5%) yielded at least 1 incidental finding. Of these, 66% contained 1 incidental finding, 31% had 2 or 3 incidental findings, and 4% had 4 to 6 incidental findings (mean number of incidental findings = 1.5). Among incidental findings, 34.8% were dental-related, followed by 19.9% vascular, 15.3% intracranial, 11.2% unexpected non-sinonasal mass, 7.8% spine, 6.6% otologic/temporal bone, 1.5% orbit/ophthalmologic, 1.4% lymphadenopathy, and 1% thoracic-related. Increasing age was associated with incidental findings (mean age with incidental findings, 59.7 years vs 49.7 years without; <i>P</i> < .001). Sex was not associated with the presence of incidental findings (<i>P</i> = .583). Importantly, 3.4% of findings were considered potentially clinically serious.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Incidental findings are frequently reported on sinus CT scans, though the vast majority are not considered potentially serious. Further refinement of systems for denoting their clinical significance may minimize the burden for clinicians and worry for patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":520787,"journal":{"name":"The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology","volume":" ","pages":"34894251339894"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidentalomas in Paranasal Sinus Computed Tomographic Imaging: Frequency and Characteristics.\",\"authors\":\"Marta M Williams, Samantha M Shave, Margaret B Mitchell, Ryan A Bartholomew, Neil Bhattacharyya\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00034894251339894\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>As patient access to radiology reports increases, incidental findings can be a significant source of stress and an increasing burden for clinicians to address. This study analyzes the frequency and characteristics of incidental findings on paranasal sinus computed tomography (CT) scans.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of a random sample of radiology reports for paranasal sinus CT scans in a metropolitan healthcare system in 2021 was conducted. Incidental findings were defined as unexpected findings which an otolaryngologist would not typically manage or would evaluate using different diagnostic modalities. Incidental findings were categorized based on anatomic location and etiology. Associations between incidental findings with age and sex were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1000 scans, 385 (38.5%) yielded at least 1 incidental finding. Of these, 66% contained 1 incidental finding, 31% had 2 or 3 incidental findings, and 4% had 4 to 6 incidental findings (mean number of incidental findings = 1.5). Among incidental findings, 34.8% were dental-related, followed by 19.9% vascular, 15.3% intracranial, 11.2% unexpected non-sinonasal mass, 7.8% spine, 6.6% otologic/temporal bone, 1.5% orbit/ophthalmologic, 1.4% lymphadenopathy, and 1% thoracic-related. Increasing age was associated with incidental findings (mean age with incidental findings, 59.7 years vs 49.7 years without; <i>P</i> < .001). Sex was not associated with the presence of incidental findings (<i>P</i> = .583). Importantly, 3.4% of findings were considered potentially clinically serious.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Incidental findings are frequently reported on sinus CT scans, though the vast majority are not considered potentially serious. Further refinement of systems for denoting their clinical significance may minimize the burden for clinicians and worry for patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520787,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"34894251339894\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894251339894\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894251339894","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:随着患者获得放射学报告的机会增加,偶然发现可能成为临床医生需要解决的压力和负担的重要来源。本研究分析副鼻窦电脑断层扫描(CT)偶发之频率及特点。方法:对2021年某大城市医疗系统鼻窦CT扫描的随机放射学报告进行回顾性分析。意外发现被定义为耳鼻喉科医生通常不会处理或使用不同诊断方式评估的意外发现。偶发发现根据解剖位置和病因进行分类。研究了偶然发现与年龄和性别之间的关系。结果:在1000次扫描中,385次(38.5%)产生至少1个偶然发现。其中,66%包含1个偶然发现,31%有2或3个偶然发现,4%有4至6个偶然发现(平均偶然发现数= 1.5)。在意外发现中,34.8%与牙齿相关,其次是19.9%的血管、15.3%的颅内、11.2%的意外非鼻窦肿块、7.8%的脊柱、6.6%的耳部/颞骨、1.5%的眼眶/眼科、1.4%的淋巴结病和1%的胸部相关。年龄增加与意外发现相关(有意外发现的平均年龄,59.7岁vs无意外发现的49.7岁;p = .583)。重要的是,3.4%的结果被认为是潜在的临床严重。结论:在鼻窦CT扫描中经常报告偶然发现,尽管绝大多数不被认为是潜在的严重问题。进一步完善表示其临床意义的系统可以最大限度地减少临床医生的负担和患者的担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Incidentalomas in Paranasal Sinus Computed Tomographic Imaging: Frequency and Characteristics.

Objectives: As patient access to radiology reports increases, incidental findings can be a significant source of stress and an increasing burden for clinicians to address. This study analyzes the frequency and characteristics of incidental findings on paranasal sinus computed tomography (CT) scans.

Methods: A retrospective review of a random sample of radiology reports for paranasal sinus CT scans in a metropolitan healthcare system in 2021 was conducted. Incidental findings were defined as unexpected findings which an otolaryngologist would not typically manage or would evaluate using different diagnostic modalities. Incidental findings were categorized based on anatomic location and etiology. Associations between incidental findings with age and sex were examined.

Results: Among 1000 scans, 385 (38.5%) yielded at least 1 incidental finding. Of these, 66% contained 1 incidental finding, 31% had 2 or 3 incidental findings, and 4% had 4 to 6 incidental findings (mean number of incidental findings = 1.5). Among incidental findings, 34.8% were dental-related, followed by 19.9% vascular, 15.3% intracranial, 11.2% unexpected non-sinonasal mass, 7.8% spine, 6.6% otologic/temporal bone, 1.5% orbit/ophthalmologic, 1.4% lymphadenopathy, and 1% thoracic-related. Increasing age was associated with incidental findings (mean age with incidental findings, 59.7 years vs 49.7 years without; P < .001). Sex was not associated with the presence of incidental findings (P = .583). Importantly, 3.4% of findings were considered potentially clinically serious.

Conclusion: Incidental findings are frequently reported on sinus CT scans, though the vast majority are not considered potentially serious. Further refinement of systems for denoting their clinical significance may minimize the burden for clinicians and worry for patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信